TheWorthyEdge
Member
We'll get as much out of Coppa as we'll get out of anybody else, because we wasted a whole day arguing about two neutrals instead of hunting scum.
Which I said we shouldn't have done.
We'll get as much out of Coppa as we'll get out of anybody else, because we wasted a whole day arguing about two neutrals instead of hunting scum.
Rather than arguin' in circles about who may or may not be cult, do we know if there's anyone who definitely isn't cult? I remember some stuffy British guy sayin' "if you eliminate the impossible, what remains must be the truth," so maybe we should give that a shot while we await th' resta our absentee friends.
I imagine you mean that promising lead if Coppa flips Cult would be me? The case against Coppa that you all have developed is, quite frankly, about as solid as an ice cream on the ground in California. I think that Nin should be the one to go today.
I'll ask this question then, what information would lynching Coppa provide that is so much better than what lynching someone else would?
Alright, Flame, enough with the silly innuendos.
If you have an Override don't fucking use it.
You're not smarter than the rest of us, as much as you clearly think you are. A lot of us, seemingly a plurality and possibly a majority, think Coppa is the best choice for today. If he doesn't go today, he's gonna go tomorrow. All you'll do by stopping that is kill our momentum dead for the second day running and force us to do the same old dance on Day Four.
Though I would still like to see this answered. People keep saying it might change my interactions and cast them in a different light, but if you look back on it the majority of my interactions are with people who are dead. Blargonaut and Sorian were probably the 2 people I replied to the most, and we know both are dead. Other than that we have Rats rounding out the top three, because he's continually accused me of being a cult. I don't see how much analysis you'll get when you see I'm a nobody.
Why has nin been suspicious? Because he's like me? He goes along with the ride? Maybe some of us don't have a lot of time lol
If you find something that would make me say "OH. NIN IS DEFINITELY A CULTIST." Then please. Present it to ms.
I'm sorry you read it as a threat. It was more of a question of how much you were sure I'm a cultist phrased aggressively. When cornered and questioned I tend to get a bit more aggressive, pardon the tone.This was the first thing Coppa said that really bugged me. I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't think threats of this sort are the kind of thing that help Town.
And? Given the chance to survive I would like to. Besides, I didn't see us losing 5 people last night, I saw us losing 2 (I miscounted and forgot Matt Attack would leave us as well, we would have lost 3 if not for Neuromancer/Sorian's crazy debacle). The numbers change now, and I still think losing a tourist is something we should avoid.The missing context here is LoC saying we lynch Coppa today. Coppa agrees, like a good little Townie would, but his promise wouldn't even last the rest of Day Two. Also note the suggestion that an investigator not look into him on Night Two.
A much harder plea, on the grounds that an investigation of Coppa would be bad for Town. You don't want to hurt Town, do you?
If it's not clear, this post is a subtle way of pointing suspicion at Darryl, as he'd previously expressed he wouldn't entertain baseless accusations. A shady, subtle tactic, instead of making an argument and standing behind it. Not Tourist behavior, I don't think.
He asked me point blank what my reasoning was. If my reasoning is "I think you have a special power" do you want me to come out and say it and give that away? What the hell would you do?This comes off to me as subtle fishing for Flame's role. But he's careful not to go too far, and he wants us all to know about it, because that's what a Townie would do.
HEY WHAT TIME IS THAT?! Offence? WRONG! D!
FENCE!
D!
FENCE!
YEAH! GO TEAM COPPANUVA! GO TEAM TOURISTS!
Ok enough fucking around, time to get to brass tacks. I'm going to explain Rats off to ya's posts and explain why he's wrong. I've responded to Rats' day one post before, and my defense is largely the same on that. The one thing I will add is that he mentioned the orb is a recruitment device for the cult, and they would want to use it. We didn't know that at the time I posted any of the questions about it and I urge you to take that into account when reading it. I've since changed my opinion to be that posession of the orb isn't something we want to disclose. We stand to gain more by not knowing who has it than anything.
I'm sorry you read it as a threat. It was more of a question of how much you were sure I'm a cultist phrased aggressively. When cornered and questioned I tend to get a bit more aggressive, pardon the tone.
And? Given the chance to survive I would like to. Besides, I didn't see us losing 5 people last night, I saw us losing 2 (I miscounted and forgot Matt Attack would leave us as well, we would have lost 3 if not for Neuromancer/Sorian's crazy debacle). The numbers change now, and I still think losing a tourist is something we should avoid.
Again, I've explained the logic here. I honestly don't see myself lasting longer than today (nor did I see myself doing so last night). As a tourist, we should do our best to win, and that means finding cultists.
No no, it's not at all. Rather than point out when people don't respond to queries about Lone_Prodigy they didn't read and then accuse them of being tourists... oh wait.
He asked me point blank what my reasoning was. If my reasoning is "I think you have a special power" do you want me to come out and say it and give that away? What the hell would you do?
That said, I'm resigned to my fate and honestly I see myself in the same position as Blargonaut was yesterday. There's too many people to placate entirely and I feel I'll be a diversion to any actual discussion the next few day phases if people continually hide behind "BUT COPPA IS SO SUSPICIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!"
When I'm revealed read over all my posts and realize I said literally exactly what I was thinking. Not one of those is hiding ANYTHING about my intentions in this game, I tend to play these things straight forward. I outline all my key points of logic, and I don't think there's much more you can interpret from this. I'm spending the rest of this day phase pulling out suspicious clues against the people I think need to get out soonest.
I have asked indirectly and gotten no response, so now I will ask directly - Coppa, Flame, who do you suspect? Who do YOU think should go?
I'll ask this question then, what information would lynching Coppa provide that is so much better than what lynching someone else would?
Fact o' the matter is, we won't know anythin' for sure until after we've lynched someone t'day. All we've got for now are hunches, and whatever the lynchee turns out to be will hopefully give us enough information to go off 'f.
I have asked indirectly and gotten no response, so now I will ask directly - Coppa, Flame, who do you suspect? Who do YOU think should go?
RE Flame_AC: What the hell are you doing? If you're trying to subtly hint you are a power role, it's not working. You've basically told everyone at this point. And OK, I get you want Coppa to live, but do you have some reasoning for that or is it "just because"? If you know something we don't either say it upfront or be a little more subtle with your information (too late for that now). It doesn't help anyone to just plainly say "this isn't happening because I said so". That doesn't help us at all.
I don't have time for a full list, but off the top of my head (and without super deep prying) here's who I think are worth looking into:
As for Flame_AC, I would much prefer he not use a power role to save me if he has one. Like you said, it's almost impossible to read it without painting a huge target on him, and unless he's the cop and also knows who a cultist is, I'm worried losing him would hurt us too badly.That said, he's now in a tricky spot if he has a role, does he use it while he can in a not ideal time, or does he wait and hope he lives long enough to use it? I honestly think for the good of the team he shouldn't have gone out this openly to protect me given that I'm almost always going to be a prime suspect.
Here's the list of Tourists again: Droplet, Coppa, myself, Vylash (purely inactive, ordinary tourist), or Retro are Cultists.
I agree with this, but I still don't think lynching me gets you much information about other people. As it stands I've been mainly a lone wolf unattached to people. Other people even claim I haven't contributed much thought and have gone along with general tendencies, which I can agree with. We've been in 2 days and there's been 2 votes. I was grouped with the winning vote both times. However even amongst people I sided with almost nobody has argued FOR me (with the exception of Flame_AC). I'm telling you I'm going to flip ordinary tourist, I know absolutely nobody with the exception of Flame_AC (and the cult members who would honestly be stupid to side with me at this point) believes I'll flip tourist at this point. What do you stand to gain from that knowledge?
Right now everybody is thinking "He's going to flip cult and when that happens who can I analyze and attack next." That's the wrong avenue to bark up and you're wasting your time thinking that way. When I flip tourist, who are you going to analyze next? I've thought and thought about it and I have no idea who you'll get any sort of leads on based on that revelation. If I did, I would start outlining it now because I'm accepting my lynch as an inevitability at this point.
If you don't want me to save you, and you're fine dying, I'll let it go and carry on your memory to the end of the game. However, if you want, I'll be glad to keep my current position, it's a matter of what do you want?
Or, if everyone else is agreed, 100%, barring the inactives, that Coppa is the choice for today, I'll relent.
Um. Sorry, this is a bit unclear. Am I town, or a cultist?
That's the thing I'm not sure of. It depends ultimately on how much you can prove, and whether or not you think you'll last much longer. If you think you'll survive longer by not saving me, do that. If you think your survival won't be impacted by however you plan to save me, by all means do that. Ultimately I trust your judgement on this.
I just have a concern with this policy of ignoring the mostly inactive people. That gives any Cult members that are playing that way a free pass to continue not doing anything and slipping by.
I certainly hope there aren't any shenanigans like the Cult convincing replacements to stay inactive (and thus get replaced) to play off the "replacements must be town" thoughts that exist. Hopefully that wouldn't be stood for. But even without cheating like that someone could just be doing the 2 posts per day thing to stay within the rules and stay under the radar.
Vylash has only spoken twice right? Who did he replace and what was the relationship with the person he replaced like?
He replaced Afrocious, who never posted at all.
christ, poor blarg
i just don't have anything to add tbh, my ability sucks
It's not like I don't want to put pressure on inactives, I just don't want to be policy lynching them now when we're already down 7 in two days. We got lucky that LP was killed at night because we had something to discuss, whereas if we had just had the Tucah vote and Fireblend kill I think we would have just repeated night one. It's also less that I don't want them gone as it is I don't want to spend the day phase making choices based on no information that will then yield us no information to talk about on the next day.
And yeah, we got nothing on Vylash. So while you're here, TheWorthyEdge, got any thoughts? About Coppa, Flame, nin, whatever?
What happens on a split vote?
Split vote = No evict
Yes. I do.
Flame and Coppanuva: I have my vote on him right now strictly because he said "I won't let you guys vote coppanuva tonight." There was already suspicion on Coppanuva which makes for this whole Flame being stoic thing weird. Why would he defend someone we have a suspicion on? Could it be a big deal, such as Flame being able to see who is who? Maybe. But this could also be what he wants. For us to think that Coppanuva may be a tourist because Flame is being risky and defending him. If we kill Flame tonight and figure out what he is then we will know what Coppanuva is for a fact.
Split vote = No evict
Man you and Darryl are both stuck in Animal Crossing.
Yes. I do.
Flame and Coppanuva: I have my vote on him right now strictly because he said "I won't let you guys vote coppanuva tonight." There was already suspicion on Coppanuva which makes for this whole Flame being stoic thing weird. Why would he defend someone we have a suspicion on? Could it be a big deal, such as Flame being able to see who is who? Maybe. But this could also be what he wants. For us to think that Coppanuva may be a tourist because Flame is being risky and defending him. If we kill Flame tonight and figure out what he is then we will know what Coppanuva is for a fact.
Coppanuva 6
Droplet
Timeaisis
GreatCharleston
Rats Off To Ya
RetroMG
Never Forever
Vylash 2
Flame_AC
Coppanuva
Flame_AC 1
TheWorthyEdge
9 votes are needed to end the day early
Just doing my part to keep you all updated
The ending of Armageddon is on TV literally right now.
Miss ya, Blarg. <3
Also, I want to make a case for you all to consider lynching Rats Off To Ya tomorrow for me.
He also outlines a case against me, a known villager, at two separate days, yet in neither of these 2 days is he the first to vote for me. Day 2 he was second, today he was 4th. I see this as trying to make other people vote and then allowing him to jump in so it's not clear he initiated it.
Rats Off To Ya, do me a favor... when I flip tourist, please tell us the logic behind how you thought you could end this day tomorrow. I want to see this theory you hyped up, and by that point it should be ok to share anyhow.
Also, I want to make a case for you all to consider lynching Rats Off To Ya tomorrow for me. First, look how hard he's been pulling votes on people the past 2 days. Yes, he voted for LP the first day, but it was also clear he wasn't about to get voted off. It's a pretty easy shield a conniving cultist can grab onto if it's clear there's no risk (even better if they know the player is likely to get lynched soon, gains trust). He also outlines a case against me, a known villager, at two separate days, yet in neither of these 2 days is he the first to vote for me. Day 2 he was second, today he was 4th. I see this as trying to make other people vote and then allowing him to jump in so it's not clear he initiated it.
I'm also wary of how quickly he jumped to gain talk control. Rather than allowing other people to speak, he raised his case against me again early on, which has since dominated conversation today. This is the second day in a row I've been up for major talks, and it's greatly hampered our information gathering sessions. This is a pretty easy stall tactic, meanwhile the cult is gathering more kills every night, along with our mysterious second night killer. I think Rats Off To Ya poses a strong risk to our success, though I will commend him on not outright saying who he thinks is suspicious today (since that would inform the Cult who NOT to kill).