That said, you're still making a big mistake lynching me here. But how sure of this are you? If I'm not a cultist would you stake your reputation on it? Volunteer to die next?
This was the first thing Coppa said that really bugged me. I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't think threats of this sort are the kind of thing that help Town.
Awww my own puzzle? <3 you too Blargy!
That said, how much are you willing to put on me here? If I flip over as a regular nothing special tourist what happens? I guess that's up to the village to decide. I expect solutions to this in the dead thread when we inevitably meet there.
Not just me, Blarg gets a taste of it, as well.
That was the deal I proposed, I fully intend to see it through. Also, if there's any full seer out there, use your powers wisely tonight, there's been some interesting proposals and votes today, I'd look into those sooner.
The missing context here is LoC saying we lynch Coppa today. Coppa agrees, like a good little Townie would, but his promise wouldn't even last the rest of Day Two. Also note the suggestion that an investigator not look into him on Night Two.
I wanted to respond to these because I think calling this out is important. I was inclined to agree with Sorian at first, having a seer prove my innocence WOULD be nice, but I don't think it's the best move long-term. Right now people seem town between voting for Blargonaut, Me, or Matt Attack. The debate is more of "Who should we kill first?" rather than "Who do we kill?", since it's decided that Blargonaut and I are close to the top of the chopping block. There's very few people supporting me. I fear if a seer looks at me, and backs me up, they'll be unwittingly drawing a giant target on their back (after all, it would be a pretty big about face at this point and would out them as a seer to the cultists).
If you're a seer thinking about examining me, I urge you to examine someone else. I'm prepared to die within the next 2 day phases. Use the extra night to gather other information, preventing the loss of me isn't worth giving the cultists a clue who our seer is. Get information on people we're more unsure of, use that to get us a win.
A much harder plea, on the grounds that an investigation of Coppa would be bad for Town. You don't want to hurt Town, do you?
Bravo ScraftyDevil, I like this interrogation tactics. For future record, I'm marking "unwilling to go along with questions" as a point of suspicion. Given that Rats off To Ya uses it as an argument against me, I think it's fair if I call out when people don't answer accordingly, or reply to a question with "I'm not answering that."
Also looking over a theory I was making last night and... jesus. I should not be making mafia theories late at night. Way too many holes.
If it's not clear, this post is a subtle way of pointing suspicion at Darryl, as he'd previously expressed he wouldn't entertain baseless accusations. A shady, subtle tactic, instead of making an argument and standing behind it. Not Tourist behavior, I don't think.
Well, there's a few ways to look at it... if we take you at strictly your word value you say you won't let me be lynched today. This suggests you have some way of influencing the outcome of this vote. I mean, granted the way the numbers are stacked, this could just be casting a vote on blargonaut and ending the day early if needed. I don't really want to go too in depth here, in case I'm correct on this.
The other way is that you get me. You understand me and the role I have to play in a way few others here can, and are prepared to use that understanding to argue for me.
The other alternative is that you don't actually know and you're really hoping I flip town when I die so you come out looking good. Regardless, you've made an ally out of me for the time being.
This comes off to me as subtle fishing for Flame's role. But he's careful not to go too far, and he wants us all to know about it, because that's what a Townie would do.
I'm going to point out 2 things in case I die:
1) We're likely dealing with at least 3 remaining cultists. Look carefully at Blagonaut's win condition text. if I'm correct he wins when 3 cultists are dead, not all like a tourist's win condition. I know most people seem to realize this, but it's important to call it out.
2) Lone_Prodigy died on night 1. We had a list of people who thought he was suspicious during day 1.Why don't we look at the list of people who seemed to think he was suspicious as a possible user of a kill power, and from that decide if we think it's neutral or town-aligned. It's not automatic exoneration from being a cultist, but I feel if there's a serial killer in the town we should get rid of them first. It would halt the killings per day by 33%.
Now he's suggesting we be suspicious of people from Day One who had the most verifiable pro-Town intentions. It's a lot like his "case" against Sorian above. At this stage of the game, with so little to go off of, why would a Tourist want to go after the ones among us least likely to be scum?
That's just a smattering of posts, and only the ones I thought to take note of. There's plenty more, and nothing Coppa said yesterday makes me feel any better about him. When he's not being scummy, he's contributing in the weakest, most obvious way possible. Agreeing with others, and speculating about things that aren't important or don't require speculation.
