Then he should have let someone else do it instead.
Okay, so PS4 has some frame-rate dips. Every reviewer is saying that. So, if Xbone maintains the frame-rate...
Either way, digital foundry comparison of this game is going to be glorious.
I guess, but maybe he made the thread and something came up before he had the chance to finish it or hand it over to someone else.Sn4ke_911 said:Then he should have let someone else do it instead.
Frame rate issues on PS4. That is just unforgivable on a cross-gen game. What the fuck are they doing at IW, twirling pencils between their fingers?
Okay, so PS4 has some frame-rate dips. Every reviewer is saying that. So, if Xbone maintains the frame-rate...
Only 150 people work in the studio. Crazy low for a title on 6 platforms. MS will never go for that, they only do 300+ people in the team per title on ONE platform.
Call of Duty games are usually worked on by multiple teams and outsourcing companies.Only 150 people work in the studio. Crazy low for a title on 6 platforms. MS will never go for that, they only do 300+ people in the team per title on ONE platform.
Xbone would have superior version.
Maybe even more interesting, how will the gaming media react if this is the case? "Minor differences" or "Xbone version is clearly superior"'?
Xbone would have superior version.
Maybe even more interesting, how will the gaming media react if this is the case? "Minor differences" or "Xbone version is clearly superior"'?
Only game I loved in the series, I'll need to check out more impressions on the mp."Staunchly unambitious, and the weakest effort in the series since MW2."
Sledgehammer made MW3's single player campaign. What are they up to these days?Based on the fact that the teams have alternated every year since 07?
Hmm, it could be why it is much lower than other COD. Way too much outsources but few people work on it. (150 people total)
Giant Bomb mentions it happening during multiplayer. I doubt there's load "hitching" in MP, right?It's not clear if the ps4 is dropping frames or is load "hitching". Unfortunately I can't take the average review's word for it.
Just as many teams as on MW3 and that game was a mess as well.
Yup, Treyarch's cod games are easily the worst in the entire franchise. IW get's my day one purchase every single time!
The hype is lower for this game, so the review scores reflect it. Typical gaemjurnalizm.
MW2 is the reason why I stopped playing COD. The campaign was laughable, the plot points were a joke, things happened, you had no idea why, they never touched on again, like the level where you had to save the VIP in the US. Really, I almost lost my eyes they rolled back so far and so many times during that campaign.
And the multiplayer? at any given time after 2 weeks it was online, in any match there were like 3 to 4 different air strikes going on, it was unbalanced, buggy, and a mess.
Can you point out to me the good things about MW 2? I seriously cannot see it.
As a pc gamer its the complete opposite.
Mw2/3 were hack ridden non-fov changeable piles of shit.
The treyarch games had servers , and barely any cheats - and also things like FOV sliders. (And they were indeed balanced for lean)
I can POSSIBLY understand that point of view for a console gamer , but really MW3 was just a giant steaming pile altogether , there was nothing good about that game.
They should just release a cod4 free like quake live and people will love it.
They need to go back to basics like they said they would , minimal perks and killstreaks like mw1. Its gotten ridiculous the amount of bs killstreaks are in this game , its too easy.
Anyways this is the first one im gonna pass on ... i think ever.
After mw3 i will never buy an IW pc game again.
Therse already hacks on cod ghosts on pc sadly - likely the same ones still work.
Its sad how little IW gives a crap about the fanbase that got them on the map.
/rant
So is this the lowest rated COD ever? Is the press getting tired of COD? (Never thought I'd say that.)
Nice, Jeff's favorite controller to play the game on was the ps4 controller.
Yeah, that was the most shocking comment I've seen. Jeff liking the DS4 more than the 360 controller for a FPS, wow. Frame-rate issues is also up there in the shocking department. With these visuals? Oh boy.
I also have to say, I'm not really surprised by the reviews. Ghosts really seemed like it had the most negativity pre-launch -- and I'm not talking about on GAF. On a very consistent basis I listened to impressions from the press and most of the time they didn't seem that interested.
Sounds to me like a port gone bad for next gen systems
I missed that. Where did he say it? Was there a live stream or something?
WHAT THE FUCK DO ANY OF YOU WANT
lol.
I'm a little surprised at that Polygon review score, the press usually loves jerking off these games even though they are the same fucking thing every year, I've been waiting for them to open up their eyes for a while.
Haha, very well done.
PS4 frame rate issue, yikes. I hope they either iron it out by toning down some graphical features or make it run @ 900p/720p instead to achieve smooth frame rate. This is IW/Activision we're talking about so I won't be holding my breath.
Yep. Xbone's stuck at 720p with smooth frame rate (I hope) and PS4's stuck at 1080p with crapshoot frame rate.
To be clear, all the talk about framerate problems are saying it's the campaign, not multiplayer. They're not changing the resolution now.
Giant bomba says that. Who else?Nope. They specifically said PS4 was having frame rate issues in multiplayer as well. What the hell is the point of having 1080p in this case? Give me a choice so I can lower the resolution to achieve that silky smooth frame rate.