As a straight male, I really enjoy the pics.
I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
As a straight male, I really enjoy the pics.
I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
As I've said, the ScarJo guy got 10 frigging years. For two pictures. He's going to get destroyed.
What? 10 years? Haha what?
People are curious about stuff like this, of course they're going to look.I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
She could hire the best lawyers in the country at a moments notice and without any financial concern whatsoever. Hence why I have no idea why you'd fuck with them like this. Hell, if they got together and bankrolled the court case collaboratively the guy is straight up done.What? 10 years? Haha what?
People are curious about stuff like this, of course they're going to look.
There's better stuff to fap to, but to each there own."Curiosity" isn't exactly the reason most people are looking, methinks.
Victoria Justice said her's are fake, so you can feel free to view those all day long.
The moral aspect is interesting, Victoria Justice said her's are fake, so you can feel free to view those all day long.
She said they're fake, they're composites, they're not of a real person.How does that follow?
Or it makes you look stupid when it clearly is you.Honestly I feel like that kind of reaction is somehow smarter than the scorched earth style that leads to those crazy Streisand Effect moments.
I mean it sounds stupid, but the onus is on everyone but her to prove they're real. If you just shrug and go that's not me feel free to share, it really kills whatever fun the leakers probably were going for.
She said they're fake, they're composites, they're not of a real person.
I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
Which is exactly why I'm confused at this thread and pointing the finger at iCloud. I saw mostly android phones in those pictures.Pretty sure I saw an android phone in some of them
It is what it is man. They're naked pictures of hot actresses. I don't think it's surprising that people are interested. My dick doesn't care who the pictures were intended for.I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
Sure, they're someone's nipples, but that person can't be identified by the images, if they are even against their distribution.The components are.
I'm pretty sure she said they were fake because they were, but then more were released that are real.Sure, they're someone's nipples, but that person can't be identified by the images, if they are even against their distribution.
I don't think this problem is Apple's problem, at all. Nor any of the cloud storage firms. It's simply due to lack of knowledge.
Users just want to set something up and not give a shit afterwards, without thinking about their actions. Are there pictures that I've taken with my phone that are auto synced? Absolutely, but I make sure I delete the ones from cloud storage that I don't want to be on there. And two factor should be mandatory, but people would get annoyed as it flies in the face of accessibility. We have a society that want absolute convenience without the need to think about it.
I find it weird that people are remotely comfortable looking at private images not intended for them.
If as is being suggested its not come from from photostreams but from icloud backups it's going to be apples problem. If people have deleted them from their photostreams i would think they'd have a reasonable expectation that they'd be gone.
Same goes for G+, dropbox etc. Tho google+ does give you a "delete everywhere" option and android doesn't do full system image backups like apple does.
From what I heard did also a disgruntled ex give him the password to a shared icloud accountThe vastly more likely option is that these people have weak passwords, weak forgot my password security questions (probably many with publicly available information) and no 2FA, and just like every other celebrity nude photo leak ever, a teenage-20something male random with enough research and some social engineering managed to get in.
Most of what you're suggesting in the OP is pretty conspiratorial, tbh.
People are curious about stuff like this, of course they're going to look.
Humans are inherently curious. For many, these actresses represent celebrity, beauty, crushes etc. It's not about invading privacy, but tasting the forbidden fruit in a sense. Plus people love scandals all the time. The fact you aren't meant to see it is the allure itself.
It is what it is man. They're naked pictures of hot actresses. I don't think it's surprising that people are interested. My dick doesn't care who the pictures were intended for.
There's an argument to be made for viewing any pornography as immoral, it's not produced from a healthy place at all, and as an industry it feeds on sexual dysfunction. We're curious by nature, is it right to view the JLaw pics? Probably not, but I can't say I feel bad about it.
I don't think this problem is Apple's problem, at all. Nor any of the cloud storage firms. It's simply due to lack of knowledge.
Users just want to set something up and not give a shit afterwards, without thinking about their actions. Are there pictures that I've taken with my phone that are auto synced? Absolutely, but I make sure I delete the ones from cloud storage that I don't want to be on there. And two factor should be mandatory, but people would get annoyed as it flies in the face of accessibility. We have a society that want absolute convenience without the need to think about it.
I think the concept is pretty clear to all. And then people enable it for "convenience"The photos auto-sync by default. Many people probably do not even know it is happening. Maybe they should be more aware, but maybe Apple should also make a more concerted effort to let people know.
This is a nice timely reminder on how Apple approaches security isnt it?
Oh dear.
I might get an Android phone after all this. Any good suggestions?
Good point and makes me feel like a hypocrite.I wonder how much amateur stuff is on the internet without consent from both parties.
The moral aspect is interesting, Victoria Justice said her's are fake, so you can feel free to view those all day long.
There's an argument to be made for viewing any pornography as immoral, it's not produced from a healthy place at all, and as an industry it feeds on sexual dysfunction. We're curious by nature, is it right to view the JLaw pics? Probably not, but I can't say I feel bad about it.
Lol @ saving stuff like this on a cloud, good job.
If people have deleted them from their photostreams i would think they'd have a reasonable expectation that they'd be gone
I'm not sure why everyone always tries to get these taken down. If I was one of these babes I'd just be like yeah they're me and I am slammin.
I'm sure you would love to be posted over the web with cum on you.I'm not sure why everyone always tries to get these taken down. If I was one of these babes I'd just be like yeah they're me and I am slammin.
I'm sure you would love to be posted over the web with cum on you.
Same thing can happen there. Seems more celebrities prefer Apple.
I'm sure you would love to be posted over the web with cum on you.