• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Canade spends 3.2 billions for new helicopters.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Malakhov

Banned
Jul. 23, 2004
- Ottawa -- The Government of Canada today announced the selection of the Sikorsky Aircraft-led Maritime Helicopter Team to replace Sea King helicopters currently in service with the Canadian Forces.

The selection was made as part of Canada's $3-billion Maritime Helicopter Project (MHP) for the acquisition of 28 aircraft. The Maritime Helicopter Team will furnish the Sikorsky H-92 SUPERHAWK medium-lift helicopter and support services over the next 20 years. The first helicopter will be delivered in 2008.

Canada's new H-92s will be multi-mission capable and will perform anti-submarine patrols, surveillance and ship-borne duties, and a wide range of utility roles such as Search and Rescue support, cargo and personnel transport, and disaster relief support.

"Sikorsky has been a part of Canada's history for more than 50 years, and we are proud to continue this legacy," said Sikorsky President Steve Finger. "The MHP specifications are rightfully among the most demanding in the world. There is no better aircraft to fulfill these missions than the H-92."

Sikorsky Aircraft has reiterated its long-term commitment to Canada by joining with two leading Canadian companies to form The Maritime Helicopter Team. General Dynamics Canada, based in Ottawa, Ontario, is responsible for the H-92 systems integration and will furnish a 100 percent Canadian-developed and built Mission Data Management System. L-3 MAS Canada, based in Mirabel, Quebec, brings proven performance in long-term in-service support for the Canadian Forces.

"General Dynamics Canada has been serving our Armed Forces since 1948, and we have consistently proven our capability to successfully complete large, technically complex projects," said GD Canada's President John Watts. "Our team of qualified and dedicated workers are eager to provide the H-92 with a world-class Integrated Mission System. We will draw on the extensive systems integration experience we have gained over the years to ensure the success of the MHP programme."

Sylvain Bédard, President of L-3 Communications MAS Canada added: "We are pleased with the selection of the MHT which will provide the Canadian Forces with the next generation maritime helicopter. Our Sikorsky-led team recognizes the advantages of the safety and reliability inherent in the H-92 design and capitalizes on the strength of the Canadian industry partners--GD Canada providing the mission suite and L-3 MAS with the leading role for the provision of in-service support.

"This selection continues the long-standing L-3 MAS tradition as the leading provider of quality, responsive and innovative solutions in support of the Canadian Air Force operational requirements."

The Sikorsky H-92 Maritime Helicopter Team was selected over the AgustaWestland team and its EH-101 Cormorant offering. A Lockheed Martin/NH Industries consortium NH-90 proposal was eliminated earlier this year.

The H-92 flies faster, farther, is safer, carries more and costs less to operate than its MHP competitor. It builds on the heritage of five million flight hours achieved through the Sea Stallion, SEAHAWK and BLACK HAWK aircraft, and the Sikorsky Sea King that has served the Canadian Forces for more than four decades.

Breaking new ground for medium-weight helicopters, the H-92 provides unprecedented levels of safety and reliability. It is the only rotorcraft in the world certified to the latest FAA, EASA and JAA safety regulations and is designed to the latest specifications for flaw tolerance, bird strike capability and turbine burst protection.
I don't know much about these helicopters but anything is gonna be better than those Sea Kings, they had problems landing unexpectedly and they were about twice as old as their average pilot :p

Here's some pics from those helicopters:


H92_0003L.jpg

H92_0005L.jpg

H92_0004L.jpg
 

Hitman

Edmonton's milkshake attracts no boys.
NO CANADA NO!

We alrdy have the world's biggest military.. why spend more.
 

Fifty

Member
We had about 6 of the old ones before, I guess this is good news. :p

The first helicopter will be delivered in 2008.
GO CANADA!

We're fine as long as we don't piss people off.
 

Socreges

Banned
neptunes said:
I meant why don't they fix ontario's health care plan first. yeah, the one that Dalton screwed up. :mad:
Well, maybe that comes next. All I can tell you is that there is only so much money, and many things that need funding.
 

Socreges

Banned
We actually have a relatively decent air force.
Ripclawe said:
It would sort of help if they actually beefed up their military personnel and update their equipment.
I know that all too well given that I've written two essays on the pathetic state of Canadian defense. The lack of funding has been a matter of priority. But now that other countries are beginning to point fingers, the government really doesn't have much choice but to spend more money (at this point, 1.2% of GDP - lowest of any NATO member). This is a great sign.
 

Malakhov

Banned
We don't need to beef up our military personel, Canada doesn't need a big military presence, our military is a support military in the fields of peace keaping, medical help etc...

The peace keepers excel at what they do, they are seen very highly worldwide and even won the nobel prize. We just need to support these guys and update their equipment. This is a good step in the right direction.
 

Socreges

Banned
Malakhov said:
We don't need to beef up our military personel, Canada doesn't need a big military presence, our military is a support military in the fields of peace keaping, medical help etc...
No, we don't need a "big" military presence. But certainly one more capable of operating on its own. And competently.
The peace keepers excel at what they do, they are seen very highly worldwide and even won the nobel prize. We just need to support these guys and update their equipment. This is a good step in the right direction.
Agreed there.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Socreges said:
No, we don't need a "big" military presence. But certainly one more capable of operating on its own. And competently.
I agree with the operating on its own that's for sure, we had to hitch a ride to get to middle east last time, it was a freaking joke. But then again, that has to do with lack or equipment.
 

Malakhov

Banned
Anyways, like I said, I don't really care about our military. I just want them to be a support military and nothing more.

And we can always use the dumb yankees down there to do the dirty work for us ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom