so matthewwhatever is deflecting the fact the Ontario is the headquarters of traditional Toryism and just calling Quebec "racist" and using Duplessis as an example?
Duplessis ruled in 1940s-1960s which lead to an counter affect of secular liberalism under Lessage to break away from Duplessis' Conservatism.
Duplesssi style parties have been relegated to 3rd place and never have ruled again.
Mike Harris' Right Wingism still has a big negative impact on present day Ontario, Ontario talk radio, Ontario PCs becoming Federal MPs for the Reform Parrty/ Canadian Alliance now Harper Conservatives.
so, when I say that Ontario is the bastion of Canadian Toryism. It's a fact.
Correction: I'm calling Quebec politics prone to racism (see: Bouchard/Taylor, the hijab debate, the fact an ethno-nationalist party has held power multiple times) and massive, widespread corruption (see: Charbonneau, the regularity with which politicians are charged with ethics violations).
I'm well aware that Duplessis was long ago, but if Ontario, for some reason, is required to wear the alleged sins of Rob Ford -- a one-term mayor who, in the big scheme of things, didn't actually do anything beyond becoming late-night talk show fodder -- then Quebec gets to account for all its past sins, too. It's an absurd metric, but you're the one ranting about Protestant Toryism, which isn't a phrase people have used in about a century.
RE: Harris, you can't complain multiple times on here about Quebec talk radio -- which actually launched a political career in Andre Arthur, and as you've said multiple times has huge influence on provincial politics -- and then turn around and say that Harris is somehow responsible for "Ontario talk radio," which (besides being a completely nonsensical claim) is listened to by geriatrics and has pretty much no influence. Besides, if Harris' most enduring provincial legacy is reforming our education system so that
it's one of the top five jurisdictions in the Western world, then I'll happily take that -- particularly if the alternative is a system that yields adults who "do not perform as well on literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving skills tests."
I'm not telling how superior Québec is or not. I don't partake in dick-measuring contests. I'm saying that if you want to show that Québec isn't better than Ontario or other provinces (and it isn't), you're going to have to do better than citing Lévesque, or even some of his successors to an extent. René Lévesque isn't Nigel Farage, and his "worldview" didn't revolve around "pur laine beliefs". He didn't start the Québec nationalist movement out of fear of immigrants or racism. And you know it (at least, I hope you do).
There is an unmistakable racial element that hangs over the nationalist movement ever since Parizeau uttered his infamous quip, and certainly since Marois' charter of values, but that's an accessory to the principal. The movement is still about achieving an idealistic self-determination, not unlike children leaving their parents' nest. The few outliers making the movement about race, such as Rambo Gauthier, most certainly do not represent the whole sovereignty movement. Anyone with basic knowledge of Québec politics would know this.
I mean, I'd find it a little odd that in times of stress -- like, say, losing a referendum vote, or trying to resuscitate flagging poll numbers -- the go-to thing for PQ and BQ politicians is to go straight for racial grievances against minorities, but sure, that's all a weird coincidence and the separatist movement is clearly born out of high-minded desires for idealistic self-determination.