For anyone wondering:
"Golovkin hasn't fought anyone" in this reality translates as "He faced and soundly beaten 8 of the 10 top ranked middle weights, including two belt holders and three former belt holders".
A little misleading, isn't it? It doesn't account for the strength of the division at all.
His best wins:
1. Jacobs
2. Geale
3. Lemieux
4. Brooke (I hate this fight)
5. Macklin (maybe overrated by me, as I liked him vs. Sturm)
Something like that.
And some other average fighters like Murray, Monroe Jr, Ishida, Prokza, Stevens etc. (I guess Murray is a better win than Mackling, whatever. None of these guys are resume shapingly good.)
That's not a good resume. Not good enough anyway. I can kinda see how you wouldn't move down in weight as you age but surely, sticking to a mediocre division after calling out 154ers and 168ers is a bad look? Sorry, but he beat nobody in my book, relative to how good he is and what could have been. Jacobs is a B tier middleweight (which is more than most MWs of this era can claim to be) who got beaten more thoroughly by Pirog and Jacobs is Gennady's best W by quite a margin. Come on. He ducked the SMW division when it was hot until the top 168ers either retired or moved up to 175 or 200. He's like a 160 Wlad who, unlike Wlad, has no excuses to not move to a better division other than the desire to cling to his streak in a division that's below his level. I'm not saying he has no ambition but his priorities sure are a not sports enthusiast friendly.