Captain America: Civil War - Final Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
beautiful, but the last scene, where you see "supposedly" all heroes from both factions going at it...
well.. it's empty :)
look at this scene..
https://youtu.be/dKrVegVI0Us?t=128
does not even remotely resamble the royal rumble that civil war was...
oh well :/

Yeah, this was addressed earlier.

Only the stuff in their immediate area is going to be real. Everything else will be green screen, just as it usually is for these kind of movies.

It looks bad. Really bad.

I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg
 
I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg
Anybody expecting that should review the MCU. There aren't nearly enough heroes and villains to recreate that royal rumble without pulling them out of the magic hat, without any introduction, which wouldn't work.
 
I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg

Theoretically, they had the perfect chance to include the MCU's television/netflix/SHIELD part and they didn't. Oh well.
 
They could have waited a little longer but a lot of characters were absent in the comics civil war (Hulk, Thor), and they want to do Civil War when the MCU is at its peak. We want to see Civil War with RDJ's Stark!

And yeah, they could have included the Netflix heroes, but really I'm assuming that the TV and the movies are very very tangentially linked unless told otherwise. Shame with Ross calling Cap out as a "vigilante" that Daredevil isn't present mind.
 
I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg

Yeah, I got that. I think what additionally limits them is that visually, it is grounded in live action.
 
I'm glad there are less characters. The Winter Soldier worked because it had good character moments that worked alongside the action scenes. I wouldn't want to lose that just for more spectacle.
 
Even if they had the rights, the cost of paying all the actors alone basically makes a comic book scale fight w/ principal level characters in an all out brawl not feasible, ignoring proper filmmaking structure
 
I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg
The problem with that scene, besides the abysmal shot framing, is that the airport looks too pristine. Give me some destruction and collateral damage man. Sell me on the war.
 
Well, the fighting has to start first.
Sure, but we saw some hints of the fights scenes and the airport still looked in better condition than I would expect. It's one side-effect of having two non-powered people.

Really, I still maintain that the main issue with that scene is that the framing is crap and looks like the most cliche trash ever. I can't even begin to explain how much I dislike it.
Check the scene where Iron Man is attending to a downed Warmachine.
I mean, the place is smoking hard, sure. I guess I expect more collateral damage considering the story.
 
Theoretically, they had the perfect chance to include the MCU's television/netflix/SHIELD part and they didn't. Oh well.
Yep. I fully expected Daredevil and such here, I mean, it concerns them. They should just officially separate the Netflix side, as the film division is never going to be bothered using them.
 
Anybody expecting that should review the MCU. There aren't nearly enough heroes and villains to recreate that royal rumble without pulling them out of the magic hat, without any introduction, which wouldn't work.

Doesn't change the fact that the environment is so incredibly dull and uninspired that they are fighting in. It just magnifies all the other problems with this. With less heroes for the fight, there should have at least been an interesting environment for it to take place in.
 
I think witchedwiz was referring to how small scale the film version of civil war seems compared to the comic, which of course has the quantity thing going for it (if not the other thing.)

or, this, basically:
d1cg5WZ.jpg

exactly..
I mean, i understand limitations and whatnot.
but instead of building a civil war as a toned down 5vs5 thing, I'd have preferred them to hold it for a few years and build on the rest of the cast of mcu in the meanwhile..

they might be doing a favour the the mcu in the immediate, if this film performs well, but not in the long term, as they would waste a chance to produce one of the most controversial arc of marvel comics with a "simplified version" for a cash in..
oh well..

seriously.
civil war? the magnitude of the word?
and how many heroes are fighting? 20? 30?
like.. wow..........
 
They don't got much time or money left for Robert Downey to believably be Stark. He's already 50 and getting more expensive by the movie.

We're eventually going to have an MCU reboot years from now anyway.
 
exactly..
I mean, i understand limitations and whatnot.
but instead of building a civil war as a toned down 5vs5 thing, I'd have preferred them to hold it for a few years and build on the rest of the cast of mcu in the meanwhile..

they might be doing a favour the the mcu in the immediate, if this film performs well, but not in the long term, as they would waste a chance to produce one of the most controversial arc of marvel comics with a "simplified version" for a cash in..
oh well..

seriously.
civil war? the magnitude of the word?
and how many heroes are fighting? 20? 30?
like.. wow..........

More characters doesn't necessarily mean better. The Civil War comic itself is evidence of that.
 
exactly..
I mean, i understand limitations and whatnot.
but instead of building a civil war as a toned down 5vs5 thing, I'd have preferred them to hold it for a few years and build on the rest of the cast of mcu in the meanwhile..

they might be doing a favour the the mcu in the immediate, if this film performs well, but not in the long term, as they would waste a chance to produce one of the most controversial arc of marvel comics with a "simplified version" for a cash in..
oh well..

seriously.
civil war? the magnitude of the word?
and how many heroes are fighting? 20? 30?
like.. wow..........


Or maybe it will actually make a better film instead of a 10 year old boy's sand box about no names punching no names with no story arc for any character whatsoever.
 
I love Ant-Man, and I kinda still like Hawkeye, T'Challa is fantastic, Falcon is useless. I like Wanda so far and think Rhodey is boring as fuck. Natasha is cool. I don't have any opinion about Vision yet, never liked him a lot in the comics. Iron Man and Cap both are great.

But in the end, it boils down to "OMG Spidey!" and "Get fucked Bucky".


So, #TeamTony it is.
 
The comic to film comparisons are so ridiculous - this is the MCU version of Civil War, not a direct adaption, we've known that for a long time now.
 
The comic to film comparisons are so ridiculous - this is the MCU version of Civil War, not a direct adaption, we've known that for a long time now.

I did say it looks bad regardless of the source. And I think everyone knows it wouldn't be a direct adaption and still can be underwhelmed.
 
I still don't think the guy in the tube is tony's. The place is very dirty, and dark, tony's places aren't like that. Russos's said that both sides could be validated I don't think they're going to have tony go crazy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom