NEOPARADIGM
Banned
Yeah, so, this is the dilemma:
My gf and I are debating about a two-day trip to either Cedar Point (my choice) or Las Vegas (her choice).
Some background:
We've been to Cedar Point once (seven years ago), and we've never been to Vegas.
Vegas is way more expensive and doesn't include half the fun shit Cedar Point does.
Cedar Point is for children and is not nearly as exciting for grown adults as Las Vegas is.
I argue I want to do shit when I take a vacation, not see shit. Cedar Point wins this scenario.
The gf argues that just being in Vegas is enough, and considering we've already been to Cedar Point, this trip will be fun and "better."
I, too, argue that just "being together" is enough, and thus Cedar Point is wonderful, fun, and inexpensive.
The Cedar Point trip we have planned will cost roughly $300 less than Vegas.
So my question is, if you had to choose, is going to Vegas over Cedar Point worth the extra $300?
My gf and I are debating about a two-day trip to either Cedar Point (my choice) or Las Vegas (her choice).
Some background:
We've been to Cedar Point once (seven years ago), and we've never been to Vegas.
Vegas is way more expensive and doesn't include half the fun shit Cedar Point does.
Cedar Point is for children and is not nearly as exciting for grown adults as Las Vegas is.
I argue I want to do shit when I take a vacation, not see shit. Cedar Point wins this scenario.
The gf argues that just being in Vegas is enough, and considering we've already been to Cedar Point, this trip will be fun and "better."
I, too, argue that just "being together" is enough, and thus Cedar Point is wonderful, fun, and inexpensive.
The Cedar Point trip we have planned will cost roughly $300 less than Vegas.
So my question is, if you had to choose, is going to Vegas over Cedar Point worth the extra $300?