Well,it's America so between being labeled as racist for "attacking" a person of colour and being a toxic male for depriving that woman of her "strong female character" ability to do things on her own I think I can guess why he wouldn't want to get involved lol
We both mist the best part! The orange sock puppets.
lmfaaaaoooo, got the posture/look of a muzzled dog that knows it shit on the carpet
Vegas man filmed attacking female judge is hit with enormous sentence
Deobra Redden, now 31, was sentenced to decades behind bars on Tuesday for a judge's attempted murder.www.dailymail.co.uk
26-65 years for attack..
These dark and gritty superhero reboots are getting out of hand.
Vegas man filmed attacking female judge is hit with enormous sentence
Deobra Redden, now 31, was sentenced to decades behind bars on Tuesday for a judge's attempted murder.
26-65 years for attack..
Doesn’t matter, it’s abuse of the law. It’s not justice, it’s just vengeance.
Not sure I agree with you (although I would agree 65 years is excessive) . Those in the chairs making the decisions need to be a position where they can’t be intimidated as it would entirely undermine the legal system. There are plenty of times when the punishment likely exceeds “justice” because of whom the victim is.
Attempted murder is a serious crime.
That’s extreme in the opposite direction
It depends on how good their rehabilitation services are.
Obviously. But generally speaking, people that commit murder are bad and deserve severe punishment. How much time depends on the case and is ultimately subjective.
There are other parts of the world where this line of thinking isn't the norm, and they instead want to try and find a more humane way through everything. America has it's own system that mostly works for America, but America's system can't apply to other places as easily due to a ton of factors including crime rate and types of crimes for starters.
The problem is the current legal system is undermined. In fact, it would be probably be more fair for AI to hand out sentences than current judges. At least the outcome would be more predictable. The truth of the matter is that if this dude jumped at and attacked a random person in the courtroom other than the judge, he’s not getting that much time.
Him jumping on a judge and punching her is assault not attempted murder smh.
Read the article
Not bad. People got to admit he did do a sweet dive.Vegas man filmed attacking female judge is hit with enormous sentence
Deobra Redden, now 31, was sentenced to decades behind bars on Tuesday for a judge's attempted murder.
26-65 years for attack..
The US is all over the place. A guy robbing a store might get probation, or 10 years. California has (or had) that law where if you steal under $1,000 no cops bother coming to arrest anyone because to that state it’s not bad enough of a crime to bother.
God I love Clarence Thomas, making people like you seethe for 3 decades straight!
People like me? What am I like since you know so much about "people like me"?God I love Clarence Thomas, making people like you seethe for 3 decades straight!
I could see like 10-15 since it was a judge, but 26?! Jesus
People who think actions shouldn't have consequences, also known as a lunatic.
Yep. Just look at what's happening on the west coast when prosecutors go soft on petty crimes. Imagine going soft on violent crimes lol
Like I said, serious abuse of power. Is a judge more valuable than a regular person? If yes, how much more valuable? To be frank, I don't think this individual gets a year in prison if this attack was committed on a regular civilian so is a judge 26x more valuable than a private civilian?
Haha, you spent all that time and this is the best you could come up with? You're a big coward lol, beating around the bush like the quack you are.. Instead of you to say what you want to say, you instead skirt around like coward lol. Also for the record, I never once suggested that there shouldn't be consequences. I just questioned the severity of the consequence but, you'd have to be literate to understand....
Pretty much. I believe this harsh sentence is meant to sent a message. They're making an example out of the guy.
Life in the UK is usually 12-15 years for say a single murder. If they behave they get out 50% early. Our prisons are at crisis point right now in Scotland. A lot of people got out during Covid due to not enough cells for adequate spacing and now you have to really do something serious to get a custodial sentence.
I'm at work you dumbass, I'm not giving you my undivided attention! But thank you for the huge public freakout over a one sentence reply.
I think the total number of years is excessive, but the consequences of doing what he did was extremely predictable. This is not how you behave if you have a problem with a judge, you lose all sympathy and impetus.
It can be argued (wild argument I admit) that all these wastes of space losers give people jobs (courts, cops, prison guards lawyers etc...).
Honestly really would depend on who he jumped and why, and how much can be proven. That is how the law kind of works, as sentences have a huge range.
Here's the problem I have with this whole issue. The judges are sufficiently protected. This incident occurred in a court room with multiple bailiffs present. If this was a case where the accused sought out the judge outside of court, I'd agree with the sentence. This sentence absolves the bailiffs of their woeful failure to do the job which they are paid for. This whole incident should have never occurred. The moment, the prisoner attempted to get up, they should have reacted. If the sentence was 10 years or less, I have no problems with it. 26 years? The judge is having a laugh... People rape, commit manslaughter, even murder and get less time. 26 years for assaulting a judge in court due to the failure of the bailiffs is one of the biggest perversions of justice I've seen recently. On top of all that, tax dollars have to pay for 26 years for this perversion of justice.
I didn't mean specifically them being physically protected, but generally protected from influence or intimidation.
www.foxnews.com
Not clear if there was CCTV evidence.
Clarence Thomas has one of the most GOATED American Dream stories ever. I mean EVER.
That's an interesting example. There are other factors though like their age and history with the law, as well as their mental state and whether being medicated / treated is something that would help.Jordan Neely had history of attacks on subway riders before NYC chokehold death
Jordan Neely, who died last week on a New York City subway after a Marine veteran allegedly put him in a chokehold, had a troubling history of violent attacks on straphangers.
Not clear if there was CCTV evidence.
Personally, I think a completely random act of violence should be treated with more severity.
And to me that's a fundamental problem. Maybe some wiggle room in sentencing but when I say wiggle room I mean 15-20%. Not one dude gets a 26-year sentence and the other gets treatment program. (and these guys both had long records). Give people treatment if they need it in prison not instead of it, and give em a chance with more treatment when their sentence is up.
