• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Chilean Navy releases UFO video

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its a flying object that cant be identified. Not a UFO.


Unfortunately its usually only people who are interested in the subject who report about it. Everyone else is too afraid to tarnish their reputation.

That's still a UFO, UAP, etc.

What you are thinking of that we have no proof of it being is a "spaceship".
 
Its a flying object that cant be identified. Not a UFO.

Uhhhh.

An unidentified flying object, or UFO, in its most general definition, is any apparent anomaly in the sky that is not identifiable as a known object or phenomenon

I mean, I don't think it's an alien but it's clearly a UFO. A UFO is simply a designation for an airborne object that cannot be identified.
 
Okay, what is it then?

EDIT. So I did a little checking. Here's your guy, right? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Vall%C3%A9e

Let's have look at what it he thinks UFO's are now shall we?



So they are time travellers from other dimensions now. Well that's much more likely! Guess what, there is no actual evidence of that either.

Why not? Something seems to be interacting with people, and it appears intelligent. If you really dig into Vallee, he looks at any "visitors" as more of a manifestation of reality itself.

The point was that the field and theories are not monolithic.
 

Hankodank

Member
#CHEMTRAILS

431.jpg
 
I'm looking forward to Trump spilling the beans once he's finally debriefed.

It is one of those silver linings to the Trump Presidency.

I don't think Trump could resist spilling the beans on shit like aliens and ufos.

"FBI thinks Americans shouldn't know about our dealings with the intergalactic Zorgon Empire. Sad!"
 

Thorgal

Member
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .
 
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .
What difference would it make? Any quality footage would be immediately shut down as CGI anyway.
 

gutshot

Member
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

As already stated, there is HD footage of the object. But it's so far away, that you can't really make anything out.

The "potato" quality video you likely are referring to is the IR camera. It's black-and-white because it only shoots in infrared. And without that footage, this sighting wouldn't have amounted to anything.
 

SSM25

Member
I'm afraid to google what this chemtrails thing is ( I don't live in the US ). It's something dumb like the flat earth thing, isn't it?
 

jufonuk

not tag worthy
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

I watched the ten-minute video and that camera has some zoom on it, it;s not a potato camera
 
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

Said cameras cannot focus well on far-off objects.

And filming far off lights at night? It's very difficult even with an actual camera without a tripod for true stabilization.
 
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

Take out your phone and use the camera to capture something 50 miles away... in IR... from a helicopter...
I'll wait here for your results
 
Great, now the aliens are coming to earth just to poop on us.

Take out your phone and use the camera to capture something 50 miles away... in IR... from a helicopter...
I'll wait here for your results

Well there is an interesting phenomenon that since the explosion of virtually everybody in North America carrying a super high quality image stabilizing video camera in their pocket with virtually limitless storage, and there being high quality cameras on almost every cop car, many civilian cars, and thousands of buildings around the US, somehow video of UFOs has gone down since that 1990s peak.
 

qcf x2

Member
People really took my last post seriously? Lol. It's the cliche and least-effort "not aliens you dummy" line; I don't think people really use "HD phones" and "swamp gas" as dismissals... well, maybe some ppl use the phone thing but they clearly have never attempted to shoot video of something distant and airborne w/ their phones.

Just wait until Trump tweets about it.

That's the one thing I HOPE he does is spill the beans on the UFOs, whatever it amounts to.
 
I kind of wish they had the foresight to send out another helicopter just to quickly take air samples and quality. I'm curious what was that UFO ejecting.

I understand why that would be the furthest thing from their mind though.
 

Soroc

Member
Interesting. Correct me if im wrong but from watching the longer video it seems that this object is completely invisible to the naked eye and only shows up on other cameras? Is that what that switching back and forth between colorized shots and black/white is?

It really seems that way, but I think its just white and blends in with the cloud cover until they switch over the infrared. Its interesting though how the camera targeting system couldn't hold target of it either, kept losing it when not in IR
 

curls

Wake up Sheeple, your boring insistence that Obama is not a lizardman from Atlantis is wearing on my patience 💤
What the fudge is that? 💭💭💭
 

Jal

Member
Well there is an interesting phenomenon that since the explosion of virtually everybody in North America carrying a super high quality image stabilizing video camera in their pocket with virtually limitless storage, and there being high quality cameras on almost every cop car, many civilian cars, and thousands of buildings around the US, somehow video of UFOs has gone down since that 1990s peak.

How many people are carrying cameras with optical zooms compared to the 90s though?
 

KingBroly

Banned
Looks different than every other UFO you see put out there. It looks like an outdoor Charcoal Grill. But it's really far away, and given the gasses it put out (Assuming it is gas), I don't blame them.
 
Well there is an interesting phenomenon that since the explosion of virtually everybody in North America carrying a super high quality image stabilizing video camera in their pocket with virtually limitless storage, and there being high quality cameras on almost every cop car, many civilian cars, and thousands of buildings around the US, somehow video of UFOs has gone down since that 1990s peak.
Because everyone is too busy burying their face in their phones to be bothered to look at the sky anymore. Interesting phenomena indeed. 😎
 

BajiBoxer

Banned
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

If they got a high quality shot of the aircraft, then it probably wouldn't be unidentified :p

Looks like some sort of balloon/blimp type thing to me. Maybe something for scientific data collection or surveillance?
 

NandoGip

Member
Haven't seen the video but give it 3 weeks until a new video comes out showing that it's a dude flying a drone trying to fuck with people
 

Vena

Member
Haven't seen the video but give it 3 weeks until a new video comes out showing that it's a dude flying a drone trying to fuck with people

He's got some mighty fine military grade stealth on his drone.

Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution

Physics.
 
Shortly thereafter, the pilot contacted two radar stations - one close by on the coast, and the other the main DGAC Control system (Ground Primary Radar) in Santiago - to report the unknown traffic. Neither station could detect it on radar, although both easily picked up the helicopter. (The object was well within the range of radar detection.) Air traffic controllers confirmed that no traffic, either civilian or military, had been reported in the area, and that no aircraft had been authorized to fly in the controlled air space where the object was located. The on-board radar was also unable to detect the object and the camera’s radar could not lock onto it.

The pilot tried several times to communicate with the UAP, using the multi-national, civilian bandwidth designed for this purpose. He received no reply.

Holy shit!

That's a really awesome video and article, thanks.
 
How many people are carrying cameras with optical zooms compared to the 90s though?

How many of these cameras are actually look/are focused at the sky consistently, or even at all?

And, as said before, stabilization is near useless for small/faraway objects in the sky.
 

Vena

Member
U.S. stealth blimp, maybe?

Possible. Weird design for one, though, give the purported render estimates and flight uniformity.

It could be a test flight of some sort of stealth drone but I'm not sure why it would be flying where it was...
 
Yes but nobody can find the actual source of this story so...

Here's the release directly from the CEFAA website, it just hasn't been officially posted in English yet: http://www.cefaa.gob.cl/home/en-la-prensa/noticias/casoarmada

If you are skeptical about Leslie Kean, here is Ars Technica's write up: http://arstechnica.com/science/2017...-chilean-officials-cant-explain-ufo-sighting/

"The significance of this sighting is that it was made by credible Navy officers, lasted nearly 10 minutes, and involved observation in both the visible and infrared portions of the spectrum. While this falls far short of providing any evidence of aliens, it nonetheless is well documented and worthy of additional consideration, if only because the explanation might reveal some kind of new US military stealth technology."
 
Camera phone, on a helicopter, in 201
4
, to capture an object 50~ miles away?

Lol ppl are so funny. Ppl suck at life man.

They act as if their newer tech phones in 2016 could capture a good pic of a full moon. Lulzzzz

Gold in here.
 

Reeks

Member
Why is it that whenever someone claims to have footage of an UFO sighting it is always shot with the quality of a potato ?

I'ts 2017 people .

a phone with a decent camera doesn't cost an arm or leg or a kidney anymore .

It's an infrared camera. And this footage was shot from "approximately 35 to 40 miles (55-65 km) away."

Can your camera phone do that?

Edit:

Camera phone, on a helicopter, in 201
4
, to capture an object 50~ miles away?

Lol ppl are so funny. Ppl suck at life man.

They act as if their newer tech phones in 2016 could capture a good pic of a full moon. Lulzzzz

Gold in here.

.... yyuuuuuppppp.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom