Chipotle's "300 Calorie" Burrito Lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Charcoal

Member
The real injustice here is that they were concerned about the chorizo, when the vastly superior chicken was available.
 

Faddy

Banned
You don't really think that, unless you also think only the chorizo itself is $7.73. The sign clearly and unambiguously states that the burrito is 300 calories. Maybe, maybe, you could interpret it another way, if it only said "Chorizo" at the top.

I don't see how that sign can be interpreted any other way than the whole burrito is 300 calories.
 

Johndoey

Banned
Yea that sign is super misleading, I honestly can't figure how to read that besides the entire burrito being 300 calories.
 

darscot

Member
The sign is an obvious attempt to mislead. That being said you have to be pretty fucking daft to think a chipotle burrito is 300 calories. I'll just file this under failing education system.
 

entremet

Member
After years of calorie counting I could basically sight count many things.

LOL @ a chorizo burrito being 300 calories.

The tortilla alone is that much.
 
The sign doubles down on its implication by listing a "sprinkle of cheese". It clearly wants you to think the burrito is a low calorie option.
 

black_13

Banned
Yea that's misleading for sure. I'm glad they get sued. Makes more food companies accountable to provide accurate calorie information.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
Do you have that much faith in the American public tho 🤔

I mean, there was an entire thread on 'breakfast' burritos with people all recommending various 1000+kcal burritos. For fucking breakfast.
Like it's the most normal thing in the world to just start off your day with a single burrito that is over half the calorie count people should be ingesting in an entire 24h day. You guys have developed some fucked up eating habits if that shit is considered normal in any way, shape or form.
 

ASTROID2

Member
Only 35 calories.

only-35-calorie-rice-61ujz.png
 

Cuburt

Member
Considering how they label all their other food compared to that new sign, it is definitely misleading. I was confused when I first saw it too, but I don't even think with the tortilla and chorizo alone it's falling under 300 so I thought no way is this whole pictured burrito 300 calories.
 

SyNapSe

Member
Their chorizo is actually really good

Yes, it is.

It's obviously misleading. It's sort of amazing something like that made it through the approval process.

At the same time, you could have probably just reported it to Chipotle and they would have fixed it. It's not like it's some overarching scheme.
 
I mean, there was an entire thread on 'breakfast' burritos with people all recommending various 1000+kcal burritos. For fucking breakfast.
Like it's the most normal thing in the world to just start off your day with a single burrito that is over half the calorie count people should be ingesting in an entire 24h day. You guys have developed some fucked up eating habits if that shit is considered normal in any way, shape or form.

To be fair, if there is any part of the day when you should be ingesting a giant pile of calories in one go it is breakfast. Eating heavy dinners and then basically chilling for the rest of the afternoon/night is worse, at least the breakfast can be worked off over the course of the day.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
To be fair, if there is any part of the day when you should be ingesting a giant pile of calories in one go it is breakfast. Eating heavy dinners and then basically chilling for the rest of the afternoon/night is worse, at least the breakfast can be worked off over the course of the day.

Sure, in a perfect world where people eat a 1000kcal burrito in the morning and proceed to eat nearly nothing for the rest of the day and only a very modest dinner, these kind of things aren't that big of a deal.

Sadly, reality is quite different.
 

Lamel

Banned
Yeah it's misleading, someone is getting fired for that mistake. But overall chipotle is pretty good about providing nutrition info for their food.
 
To be fair, if there is any part of the day when you should be ingesting a giant pile of calories in one go it is breakfast. Eating heavy dinners and then basically chilling for the rest of the afternoon/night is worse, at least the breakfast can be worked off over the course of the day.

This seems super scientific.
 

Meier

Member
It's false advertising. Restaurants are supposed to share the information on what caloric count a menu item has. I don't see how anyone could honestly believe this to be accurate, but Chipotle is certainly portraying it to be.
 
That's not misleading - that's blatant lying. They know damn well what that sign looks like. Are they trying to lose all of their business?
 
While I'm definitely in the "you'd have to be an idiot..." camp on this one, the signage is definitely misleading at face value.

It announces the new meat option (Chorizo), but then goes on to describe an entire burrito and list the price for the entire burrito, followed by the '300 calories' phrasing.

There's no way that wasn't intentional. It's a clever linguistic trick, but it's just that. A trick.

I hope they get fined hard for this.
 

BlueTsunami

there is joy in sucking dick
Goes to show the general populace has no caloric context. 300 calories is like 1/3rd pound of a lean steak with NOTHING else.
 
I stopped eating at Chipotle when they made it clear that they have no health standards and treat their employees like shit.

I hope these guys win.
 

tkscz

Member
What are the "unspecified damages" here? Chipolet is in the wrong here, that sign is misleading as shit, but what are the damages of eating one burrito one day? Takes a lot more than that to ruin a diet.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
What are the "unspecified damages" here? Chipolet is in the wrong here, that sign is misleading as shit, but what are the damages of eating one burrito one day? Takes a lot more than that to ruin a diet.

Any diet is ruined if you incorporate a 1100kcal burrito in it. It's incredibly calorie-dense.
 

Fliesen

Member
You don't really think that, unless you also think only the chorizo itself is $7.73. The sign clearly and unambiguously states that the burrito is 300 calories. Maybe, maybe, you could interpret it another way, if it only said "Chorizo" at the top.

yes. Whatever costs $7.73 here, is also 300 calories. - that's what the sign says.
 
Given how fucking terrible nutritional education is in this country, I can totally see a sign like that being misleading.

Exactly. People know absolutely nothing. They're apparently still persuaded by shit like putting "0g Trans Fat!" on labels for breakfast cereal.

Any diet is ruined if you incorporate a 1100kcal burrito in it. It's incredibly calorie-dense.

Especially if you think it's only 300. An extra 700 calories you're not accounting for, on the reg, could be disastrous.
 

Breads

Banned
Look at all these hindsight 20/20 people....

The sign says 300 calories. Chipotle lied their asses off and the lawsuit is just.
 

Harmen

Member
While it is obvious (for some, at least) a burrito like that contains way more than 300 calories, I think it is good that they are sued for bullshit like this. It happens way too often and often much more subtle and misleading than this blatant lie.
 
Agree that the sign is extremely misleading. No normal person is going to interpret that sign as saying anything other than the entire burrito is 300 calories.

On the other hand, I also agree that you'd also have to be severely lacking basic nutritional sense to believe that whole burrito is only 300 calories. The picture alone should be the major hint. I thought most people getting burritos at Chipotle would realize by now that the tortilla alone is about 300 calories.
 

norm9

Member
You have to be an idiot to believe the actuall burrito is 300 calories. But that's what the sign says! Yeah, signs say lots of shit.
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
I believe their arguement was "The burrito's construction is a la carte, the only guaranteed part (the meat) comes out to 300".

Which is bullshit which probably doesn't even account for the tortilla since that is technically optional as well. They are burritos, Chipotle, everyone knows that they are bad for you. Stop trying to pretend.

??? A burrito isn't inherently bad for you.

Even a 1000 calorie burrito if you don't eat 3 of them in a day.

Eating 2 Chipotle burritos on a daily basis from a nutritional perspective actually wouldn't be all that bad, if that's all you were to eat that day. Pretty solid from a protien and veggie perspective imo. And of course at least do a little exercise as 2000 calories is probably a bit above the average bmr.
 

LogicStep

Member
Common sense says it's not 300 calories but it is 100% misleading.
This. How could anyone think all of that would be 300 calories? Maybe someone that has never in their life looked or care about calories or nutrition? :/

And this chorizo is new huh? Why are they adding more meat to the menu? When the hell are they going to do queso?! Just copy Qdoba's!
 

Eyeh4wk

Member
You have to be an idiot to believe the actuall burrito is 300 calories. But that's what the sign says! Yeah, signs say lots of shit.

Idiots are protected by law, same as everyone else. Seriously though, what were they thinking with that sign?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom