Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?
I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.
How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
Because its affecting gameplay related things?Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?
I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.
How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.
Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly
They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.
Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly
Yeah, thinking of Tencent and positive effect is pretty wild. Creativity will be curtailed (admittedly it's Ubisoft so not a big loss) as Tencent has to make sure games don't offend Winnie the Pooh and CCP."their impact on culture may only be positive"
![]()
Or bad guys winning, cops or military being bad (or losing), or have skeletons in the game and billion other things CCP doesn't like.Maybe not DEI, but better not discuss too much Tianamen or the Uyghyrs.
Maybe like Disney movies, we'll have completely different flyers for the Chinese market for AC et al. As far as I know, the actual movies themselves are not different - but, that's hard to do with movies. Cutting/altering content in video games is much more easy. So perhaps there will be CCP-approved Ubi titles that will be different from those in other markets.Or bad guys winning, cops or military being bad (or losing), or have skeletons in the game and billion other things CCP doesn't like.
what made you thnink that? I read the exact opposite.
Clearly you didn't.
The IPs will be controlled by the new carved-out entity, of which Tencent has a 25% stake. Not full control.
Tbf no western company dares to offend Winnie and CCP these days, with or without Tencent involvement. So from that perspective nothing changes. And yes, that is a sad indictment of the west.Yeah, thinking of Tencent and positive effect is pretty wild. Creativity will be curtailed (admittedly it's Ubisoft so not a big loss) as Tencent has to make sure games don't offend Winnie the Pooh and CCP.
They have veto power, which typically not granted to minority owner
Obsessive culture warriors.How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
Literally on Tencent's website, detailing what ESG and DEI means to them and how they implement it.
ESG - Tencent 腾讯
腾讯于1998年11月成立,是一家互联网公司,通过技术丰富互联网用户的生活,助力企业数字化升级。我们的使命是“用户为本 科技向善”。Founded in 1998, Tencent is an Internet-based platform company using technology to enrich the lives of Internet users and assist the digital upgrade of enterprises. Our mission is "Value for Users, Tech for Good".www.tencent.com
Stop letting these fucking idiots rile people up for absolutely no reason.
Because its affecting gameplay related things?
Literally on Tencent's website, detailing what ESG and DEI means to them and how they implement it.
ESG - Tencent 腾讯
腾讯于1998年11月成立,是一家互联网公司,通过技术丰富互联网用户的生活,助力企业数字化升级。我们的使命是“用户为本 科技向善”。Founded in 1998, Tencent is an Internet-based platform company using technology to enrich the lives of Internet users and assist the digital upgrade of enterprises. Our mission is "Value for Users, Tech for Good".www.tencent.com
Stop letting these fucking idiots rile people up for absolutely no reason.
You generally don't understand things correctly, this included.Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly
How? Western developers significantly increased the inclusion of overt political themes in games, shifting focus from gameplay to social commentary. That's how.How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
More people are sick and tired of the pandering than ever before. That's why. This is obvious.Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?
I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.
How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
Do you really think a Chinese company having full control over the IPs of one of the most valuable gaming companies in the world wouldn't make more noise?They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.
Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly