CI Games CEO: Tencent is a great partner for Ubisoft. Their cultural impact may only be positive. No DEI written on their forehead. Refreshing!

Kotaro

Member
ksMQtzM.jpeg
 

Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?

I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.

How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
 
Last edited:
This guy is such a retard, start worrying about that Epic deal you made that will kill your next game and stop posting retarded shit
 
Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?

I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.

How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?

They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.

Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly
 
Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?

I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.

How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
Because its affecting gameplay related things?
 
Hope this make AC and Farcry good again.

And for sake start to use snowdrop engine in those games for a change.
 
Last edited:
They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.

Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly

Clearly you didn't.

The IPs will be controlled by the new carved-out entity, of which Tencent has a 25% stake. Not full control.
 
"their impact on culture may only be positive"

111.jpg
Yeah, thinking of Tencent and positive effect is pretty wild. Creativity will be curtailed (admittedly it's Ubisoft so not a big loss) as Tencent has to make sure games don't offend Winnie the Pooh and CCP.
 
What happened is that they spun off a new subsidiary for top Ubi IP like AC and Rainbow 6. This subsidiary has its own autonomous leadership team, no doubt with plenty of authority from Tencent to return their investment.

This allows the Guillemots to retain complete control of Ubisoft itself. But they won't make any decisions over AC anymore. I think while looking for something to do for themselves, we will get Rayman.
 
Last edited:
Or bad guys winning, cops or military being bad (or losing), or have skeletons in the game and billion other things CCP doesn't like.
Maybe like Disney movies, we'll have completely different flyers for the Chinese market for AC et al. As far as I know, the actual movies themselves are not different - but, that's hard to do with movies. Cutting/altering content in video games is much more easy. So perhaps there will be CCP-approved Ubi titles that will be different from those in other markets.

(Yes, this sounds very tinfoily, but as the quote goes: "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you".)
 
Last edited:
I hope this leads to positive change. Time will tell.

I wasn't enthused with Ubisoft before the deal, so it doesn't pan out no biggie.
 
Yeah, thinking of Tencent and positive effect is pretty wild. Creativity will be curtailed (admittedly it's Ubisoft so not a big loss) as Tencent has to make sure games don't offend Winnie the Pooh and CCP.
Tbf no western company dares to offend Winnie and CCP these days, with or without Tencent involvement. So from that perspective nothing changes. And yes, that is a sad indictment of the west.
 
They have veto power, which typically not granted to minority owner

"customary minority protection veto rights"

They are, hence the term 'customary'.

It won't give Tencent power to veto every single decision Ubi makes. It's typically reserved for critical business decisions. Usually things like making changes to the company structure or governing documents, significant transactions like acquisitions or disposals, or a significant change to the business direction. If you think it means that Tencent will wield their corporate cock because Ubi made the shinobi a woman, you're delusional. The teams still have the creative control.

The deal is basically a glorified way for Ubisoft to escape debt while Tencent can skim some of the royalties off the top of their best performing franchises.
 
They own more than 25% of Newbisoft, because they also own 10% of the other 75% via Ubisoft, plus whatever they own via their stake in the Guillemot mess.

I don't think they have control of Newbisoft, but they're getting there step by step.
 
Literally on Tencent's website, detailing what ESG and DEI means to them and how they implement it.

Stop letting these fucking idiots rile people up for absolutely no reason.
 
Literally on Tencent's website, detailing what ESG and DEI means to them and how they implement it.

Stop letting these fucking idiots rile people up for absolutely no reason.

Let's not forget the biggest pusher of ESG are Chinese wealth funds:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...on-wealth-fund-backs-esg-as-us-divisions-grow
 
Literally on Tencent's website, detailing what ESG and DEI means to them and how they implement it.

Stop letting these fucking idiots rile people up for absolutely no reason.


Kotaro Kotaro :

raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa:ca443f4786.jpg
 
Last edited:
How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
How? Western developers significantly increased the inclusion of overt political themes in games, shifting focus from gameplay to social commentary. That's how.
 
Does this guy realize that Tencent was already a shareholder at Ubisoft?

I thought the commentary was mainly about the quality of their work and their gameplay. It's the same teams being retained to work on the IP.

How did we really get to this stage in gaming, where the discourse is now overly focused on non gameplay related things?
More people are sick and tired of the pandering than ever before. That's why. This is obvious.
 
They didn't have control over Ubisoft IPs.

Now they do, full control, if I understand their agreement correctly
Do you really think a Chinese company having full control over the IPs of one of the most valuable gaming companies in the world wouldn't make more noise?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom