The moment when he reaches toward his face. Man.
What was messed up. As he tries to wipe the blood away but his hands are covered in it so he didnt really know what to do. Just sitting there in shock. Its heartbreaking.
The moment when he reaches toward his face. Man.
You're 100% right, but I'd like to add that in this war I've seen pictures, videos, and stories of civilians getting killed by multiple factions in this terrible conflict. Discriminate and indiscriminate shelling by rebel groups into regime-held areas that have killed and injured dozens, as well.Even with the US/NATO inaction it allowed Russia to intervene and we can see how badly that is going. From indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets, to white phosphorus being used. That and zero accountability from their side. Even when the US mistakingly struck civilians there was still a level of discourse and accountability held for the loss of civilian life. Russia and Assad are actively targeting civilians , aid groups, and civilian infrastructure at will.
I don't get these posts. Why would you want everyone to die? Fuck the innocent people (including the Syrian boy in the OP) who did nothing wrong except exist?
Punish the ones responsible. Not the victims.
Assad certainly deserves to be taken out and we should've a while ago. We are already in the process of taking out ISIS.Taking out Assad is the #1 step to any process. That is absolutely critical. This fucker has the blood of 200k-400k people on his hands, with millions more trapped, sieged, and tortured. At the rate he's going, he's going to surpass every dictator in Middle East history. But taking him out is not in vacuum. It should be followed by taking out ISIS as well (like we're doing in Iraq which by the way is increasingly close to being free from ISIS) and leading an effort at empowering the national transition council. Basically follow the Libya/Bosnia model but learn from mistakes.
Who would enforce it, though? Putin wouldn't agree to it. What would we do when he ignores it? There's nothing we can really do.This is why there should have been a no-fly zone enforced at the outbreak of hostilities, with or without UN authorization. Putin is directly responsible for this war. Fuck him and his apologists.
You're 100% right, but I'd like to add that in this war I've seen pictures, videos, and stories of civilians getting killed by multiple factions in this terrible conflict. Discriminate and indiscriminate shelling by rebel groups into regime-held areas that have killed and injured dozens, as well.
Who would enforce it, though? Putin wouldn't agree to it. What would we do when he ignores it? There's nothing we can really do.
True, it's horrible to see, especially the example in this thread.Not saying one side is without sin. Though one is an actual government with aid from a world power who chooses to barrel bomb and target civilians. There is a level of expectation from Russia at least to behave morally.
I strongly disagree with this. They could and would challenge it. It would be nearly impossible for that not to be challenged due to how their assets are positioned in the region, not to mention the stakes for Russia, Iran, and Syria.Russia could not challenge a US/NATO no fly zone, they do not have the means. It was earlier pre-Russian involvement they had no warplanes in the area.
Assad certainly deserves to be taken out and we should've a while ago. We are already in the process of taking out ISIS.
RustyNails, here's one huge problem you omitted: Al-Nusra (formerly known as). They want their own caliphate and unlike ISIS, they're playing it smart and doing a decent job of not antagonizing the populace.
They are a prominent force in Syria and will benefit from Assad and his forces being taken out, so it's vital for the world to be prepared for that. You need a strong and moderate alliance of rebel factions to counteract this, which may be difficult, due to Nusra being so effective against Assad, a lot of other Rebel groups have allied with them for now.
You also have to be ready to negotiate with Nusra or be willing to go through even more war to deal with them. They want their caliphate.
Are you high or something? First of all, the arch enemy of Arabs isn't "Zionists", it's other fucking Arabs. Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, Algeria, Libya, Syria, etc. In each and every one of these countries, Arabs have slaughtered each other in numbers the Israelis can and will never match. Secondly, the Mongols tore a path of death and destruction from Central Asia to Damascus. Millions of people and entire global cities were wiped out by them.Via a tomahawk cruise missile on the presidential palace in damascus.
As a muslim i will say that what the french and even mongols have done to levant pales into insignificance to what Bashar al assad has done.
Even zionists the arch enemy of arabs have shown more mercy and compassion to syrian children than bashar al assad. Syrians actually have been treated in israeli hospitals. Just ponder that fact
Currently, yes. They would fill the vacuum of power and the world would, in whispered tones, be going, "Oh, crap..."If there are moderate rebels in Syria, their numbers are so small that they couldnt possibly hold off Al Nusra, ISIS, jaish al islam , etc
That pretty much broke me. God fucking damnit.when he wipes his face and sees the blood and then goes to wipe it on the seat but thinks better of it.... I can't...
Don't be fooled, this reeks of manipulation of perception.
Even if you don't believe in agitprop conspiracy theories, I'd hope in the West by now we would have agreed that we have almost no insight into the on the ground political reality of most geo-political environments in the Middle East, and a complete inability to judge who are 'moral' actors. What is the last 100 years of Western involvement in the area but a sad and dismal tale of meddling gone wrong, alliances made and broken, betrayed, etc.
If we truly thought civilian deaths during wartime were objectionable, our behavior, and our voting, would be, en masse, far different.
Taking out Assad is the #1 step to any process. That is absolutely critical. This fucker has the blood of 200k-400k people on his hands, with millions more trapped, sieged, and tortured. At the rate he's going, he's going to surpass every dictator in Middle East history. But taking him out is not in vacuum. It should be followed by taking out ISIS as well (like we're doing in Iraq which by the way is increasingly close to being free from ISIS) and leading an effort at empowering the national transition council. Basically follow the Libya/Bosnia model but learn from mistakes.
Thank God they are alive and well.http://time.com/4457335/syrian-ambulance-boy-omran-daqneesh-fine/
He and his family are alive and well... It is the only consolation we have about this...
Russia about to get Aleppo back from ISIS (aka Moderate Rebels) and the NATO is using DAESH agencies as their PR now, lol
Genuine question, why is Assad such a problem in modern Syria's context? He may be a dictator, but he's a secular dictator and that's what we need to eradicate the cancer of ISIS and the radical religious fervor that lies at the core. Clearly the lesser of two evils here IMO, because I feel like an american alternative will be like post-invasion Iraq.
..
I can't even fathom what you read to actually get to this statement
If the past is one of the best ways to predict the future, neither will its belligerents.I will probably be 70 and I still won't know the solution to the ME.
..
I can't even fathom what you read to actually get to this statement
Not the CNN, that's for sure.
Because of how manipulative it is. The mass media cries for a kid in Syria but doesn't do the same for the kids in Yemen. Or even for the same Syrian kids being bombed by the US and its allies. I am not saying that people shouldn't feel sorry for the kid, but people should start to question the media that cries for one kid (being bombed by the Syrian government and Russia) but not even report on the bombing of civilians done by the US or their allies. Selective manipulation of information isn't a good sign if you don't want to be called out on playing favorites with news to push a narrative.
I had to block someone on facebook because he thought it was better to for them die in their home country than come here and grow up to be terrorists.
As shocking as the image is, there are some people who see it and don't bat an eyelid to the horror and suffering on display. To them, it's someone who poses a threat to them and their way of life.
Because of how manipulative it is. The mass media cries for a kid in Syria but doesn't do the same for the kids in Yemen. Or even for the same Syrian kids being bombed by the US and its allies. I am not saying that people shouldn't feel sorry for the kid, but people should start to question the media that cries for one kid (being bombed by the Syrian government and Russia) but not even report on the bombing of civilians done by the US or their allies. Selective manipulation of information isn't a good sign if you don't want to be called out on playing favorites with news to push a narrative.
Russia has threatened to veto any NATO action. There is no way around this.
What can be done to help? The situation appears to be being worse.
Why is Russia and Iran involved?
Wow never thought of it like that.
You are right.
Who would enforce it, though? Putin wouldn't agree to it. What would we do when he ignores it? There's nothing we can really do.
If there are moderate rebels in Syria, their numbers are so small that they couldnt possibly hold off Al Nusra, ISIS, jaish al islam , etc
Russia about to get Aleppo back from ISIS (aka Moderate Rebels) and the NATO is using DAESH agencies as their PR now, lol