CNN/ORC Poll: Trump 44%, Clinton 39%, Johnson 9%, Stein 3%

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you look at the age breakdowns and gender this whole almost seems Tailored to Trump. They didn't get enough respondents under age 34 to even score them and the under 45 crowd had an 8.5% margin of error which shows a very small sample size

A lot of these pro-Trump polls have weird breakdowns. Democrats major groups might be down from Obama's years but these polls have them down to an insane degree I don't believe.
 
Chill guys! Hillbear will get her little bounce after the DNC right?

more to the point, polling will settle the fuck down in about a month, unlike OT's reaction to every individual poll

cLwkwST.png
 
This hyperbole doesn't help. He will be checked enough and be unable to actually do that. What he will do guaranteed is appoint very conservative Supreme Court justices, and continue his divisive rhetoric that got him elected

Firstly, one of his whole campaign points is bragging that he will force the armed forces to commit war crimes - specifically, murdering the families of terrorists.

And who is going to check him? Commanders in Chief have been ordering the military to do stuff without any authorization from congress/senate for ages. He'll simply fire generals who don't obey him and promote those that will.

Secondly, he's not going to appoint conservative judges. At least not because they are conservative. Yeah, yeah, he floated a list he got from a conservative foundation's website. But that's because he tells Republicans what he thinks they want to here.

He's going to appoint whoever he feels like - people who are loyal to him personally.

My guess is that his first pick would be his sister
 
Trump isn't and cannot be a dictator

Why can't he be? Why won't he be? If he's got the public support to do what he wants what's to stop him from doing what he wants?

This is how dictatorships get started. He's already got a list of people to "purge."
 
Bernie-or-Bust people are insignificant and most likely wouldn't have voted anyways.

But I can see you already have an excuse lined up in your pocket if Trump were to win.

The article says that the increased support for Trump largely comes from independents, which the Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, Bernie-or-bust crowd is composed of. Yes, they are relevant. They are pushing the Hillary is untrustworthy narrative, loudly.

The New York Times article does help alleviate fears though. Thank god.
 
Why can't he be? Why won't he be? If he's got the public support to do what he wants what's to stop him from doing what he wants?

This is how dictatorships get started. He's already got a list of two thousand names of people to "purge."

We've got checks and balances to prevent that. However, he can do a loooooot of damage to the country. Both, by people from the outside and her own citizens.
 
If the polling looks like this a month from now, then people can start worrying. Freaking out about a poll between conventions, where the nominee who just had his convention got a bounce and the other nominee's convention hasn't even started yet, seems silly to me.
 
What's the most likely scenario of a Trump precidency? Dollar at a new low, unemployrment higher than the last couple of decades, new wars, more terrorist attacks, border wall, hurt foreign relations, more racism, higher crime rate and government approved torture? Is this the new-found greatness?

I just hope it isn't the spark for WW3.

Conservative Supreme Court appointments, emboldened white nationalists/supremacists, increase in racial profiling and surveillance, quasi-police state, boots on the ground against ISIS, deteriorating foreign relations, increase in domestic terror attacks, lots of protests and riots nationwide/increased racial tension. Pretty utopian, huh?
 
In any sane world the shit show that was the RNC would have torpedoed Trumps numbers.

But this has been a sad constant this election season. No matter how terrible the things Trump says or does, the mere fact that he says or does anything, gives him a bump.

Terrifying.
 
People need to be checking fivethirtyeight.

it's also helpful to look at what all the other people with statistical models are saying. the upshot's been providing this for the past few weeks and it's kinda illuminating

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?_r=0

note that PEC, which was statistically closest in 2012 and tied with 538 in 2008, is significantly more bullish on clinton right now (in large part because it's just a straight average of state polls)
 
Conservative Supreme Court appointments, emboldened white nationalists/supremacists, increase in racial profiling and surveillance, quasi-police state, boots on the ground against ISIS, deteriorating foreign relations, increase in domestic terror attacks, lots of protests and riots nationwide/increased racial tension. Pretty utopian, huh?

"None of that matters. It doesn't affect me."
 
Peaked too early, don't worry....

Anyway, he can't just do what he wants in office so it's wouldn't be a total disaster.

UK might feel better about themselves though, a little bit.
 
Since I was curious, i google searched polls for the 2012 elections, and this image was one of the top results:

2000px-Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012.svg.png


Yeah, not going to start to panic yet.
 
We've got checks and balances to prevent that. However, he can do a loooooot of damage to the country. Both, by people from the outside and her own citizens.

Who's going to impose those checks and balances? The congress whose main activity was to sabotage the government in the past years? The congress who is ruled by the party who happily cheered Trump at the convention?
 
The article says that the increased support for Trump largely comes from independents, which the Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, Bernie-or-bust crowd is composed of. Yes, they are relevant. They are pushing the Hillary is untrustworthy narrative, loudly.

The New York Times article does help alleviate fears though. Thank god.

Most independents from my experience are just Republicans in the closet. Instead of looking at independents pushing Trump over Hillary, you should first wonder why or how Trump has so much support in the first place.

Bernie-or-Bust people are insignificant; the fact is Trump has millions upon millions who believe in his racist, hateful rhetoric. The race shouldn't be this close to begin with.
 
He is pretty much at his ceiling at this point if we look at this poll.It will be time to panic if he ever gets close to 50 percent.Also,we do know from polling data that he seems to still be pissing off hispanics.Also,polling will never be able to capture Trump's really poor ground game currently and potential demographic turnout on election day in this election cycle.I been through this same song and dance again before with the federal election in Canada last year and the right wing party was always struggling to get past their ceiling in the polls. The other two political parties were more fluid in the polls.The same thing is happening here.Hilary seems to be more fluid in the polls while Trump is more static and can rarely every move past the low fourties in the polls.If Hilary can consolidate almost all the support from people on the left and center Trump is pretty much finished. It is very likely she does this eventually.
 
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/07/25/trump.clinton.poll.pdf

Q15. From what you have heard or read, how would you rate Donald Trump’s acceptance speech at the
Republican National Convention on Thursday night, as -- ?
July 22-24
2016
Excellent 21%
Good 19%
Just okay 18%
Poor 10%
Terrible 18%
Didn’t see (vol.) 14%
No opinion 1%

18- 35- 50- Under 45 and
Total 34 49 64 65+ 45 Older
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------
Clinton and Kaine, Democrats 45% N/A 46% 40% 41% 54% 40%
Trump and Pence, Republicans 48% N/A 44% 58% 52% 36% 54%
Other 2% N/A 3% * 1% 5% 1%
Neither 4% N/A 7% 2% 5% 4% 5%
No opinion 1% N/A 1% * 1% 1% *
Sampling Error +/-3.5 +/-8.5 +/-6.0 +/-5.0 +/-7.5 +/-3.5

North Mid- Sub-
Total east west South West Urban urban Rural
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Clinton and Kaine, Democrats 43% 52% 39% 40% 43% 53% 39% 35%
Trump and Pence, Republicans 47% 35% 51% 52% 45% 36% 48% 60%
Other 1% 2% 1% 2% * 1% 2% *
Neither 8% 10% 8% 6% 9% 8% 9% 4%
No opinion 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1%
Sampling Error +/-3.5 +/-7.0 +/-7.0 +/-5.5 +/-7.0 +/-6.0 +/-5.0 +/-7.0

lol they didn't sample enough 18-35 YO voters. And his gains came from 50-64 YO suburban/rural white "independent" non-college grad male voters in the Midwest/South. Not surprising there.
He's running up the score with idiots.
 
Is that when the first debate of Trump vs Clinton happen? I so want her to crush him live on TV so that people can finally open their eyes. Forget about her whole email fiasco, you think that's bad? Wait until you see what Trump does if he's president.
Trump was at his most popular when on stage ridiculing his opponents to their face. He has not done that in months, and honestly the trump hype has been tampered down since. If he gets on stage and starts talking smack to Hillary in a way most anti Hillary people wish they could, his numbers will rise again.
 
this is a post-convention boost. Our convention starts this week, let's see how things look next monday. also, fuck bernie-or-busters, they'd rather just fuck the country over than vote for hilary. ridiculous.
 
Trump was at his most popular when on stage ridiculing his opponents to their face. He has not done that in months, and honestly the trump hype has been tampered down since. If he gets on stage and starts talking smack to Hillary in a way most anti Hillary people wish they could, his numbers will rise again.

you're aware that clinton experienced her most prolonged national polling bounce of the campaign thus far (with the lead expanding from +3 to +11) during a period where the republicans had 4 debates in 4 weeks, right
 
I think people will quickly grow tired of Trump if he sticks to bullying tactics during the debates. Those who are tuning in to make up their minds between candidates will probably want to hear policy. They already know he can yell at people, they want to see if he really has substance. Maybe I'm overestimating the average viewer though haha.
 
Dude the RNC was one big failure and he still got a bump, that is just crazy.
Failure is relative. It was a colossal success for a certain portion of the public that doesn't exercise their capacity for self-analysis and just want to be massaged.

"I am your voice" indeed.
 
The problem here is that when Trump has good numbers, it fuels another rise in his numbers after. Many don't vote for him at first thinking he'd never win, but as his numbers rise a lot of those people suddenly see he could win and hop in to be on "the winner's side", in many cases to give the finger to "the system".

If it wasn't for the DNC this week chances are this bump would fuel another one by next week, a big one.

We'll see if things go really well at the DNC.
 
It's crazy. I don't believe in any god. I don't believe in signs. But here we have clear examples all over the globe that we shouldn't be as complacent as many are being.

We looking across the Atlantic to our English cousins with Brexit. Fear mongering and apathetic voters led them into a disastrous situation. We look to Turkey as see a beacon of secular democracy being dismantled by a dictator-lite, effectively becoming an autocracy. Global temperatures are rising and we have an entire political party who don't even recognize climate change.

Even with all of this, people think it's an ok idea to just sit on our hands and do nothing to stop it.

When speaking about life in the universe, scientists discuss the difficulty for a society to move past a type 0 civilization into a type 1. It's very possible that many worlds are unable to cross that line and end up destroying themselves. My understanding of things currently lead me to believe that despite what many religions says, there is nothing special about us. Maybe we just won't make it. Like so many worlds that probably didn't.

I'm losing faith in us to get it together.
 
I think people will quickly grow tired of Trump if he sticks to bullying tactics during the debates. Those who are tuning in to make up their minds between candidates will probably want to hear policy. They already know he can yell at people, they want to see if he really has substance. Maybe I'm overestimating the average viewer though haha.

You are. Logic and reason goes out the door every election cycle; elections are emotionally driven.
 
The most ironic thing is that main argument of Hillary supporters here on GAF in her favor was that she would be a better candidate at stopping Trump than Bernie.

This was suggested time and time again in spite of polls showing the opposite. What happened when nate silver chose punditry over polling to make predictions?

Still early so let's hope this is temporary... but holy shit this is terrifying.
 
I think people will quickly grow tired of Trump if he sticks to bullying tactics during the debates. Those who are tuning in to make up their minds between candidates will probably want to hear policy. They already know he can yell at people, they want to see if he really has substance. Maybe I'm overestimating the average viewer though haha.

I don't know, I think people have jsut been watching the debates for a Trump show....


This is disheartening. To think we've made a lot of strides socially as a country these past 8 years and then shit like this sends us back to the stone age.
 
Most independents from my experience are just Republicans in the closet. Instead of looking at independents pushing Trump over Hillary, you should first wonder why or how Trump has so much support in the first place.

Bernie-or-Bust people are insignificant; the fact is Trump has millions upon millions who believe in his racist, hateful rhetoric. The race shouldn't be this close to begin with.

My anecdotes with independents completely differ here in Oregon. People who certainly care about fixing racial inequality, but feed greatly into the Crooked Hillary echo-chamber. I appreciate the argument though; the shift of independents to Donald supports the argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom