If people really understood how the process worked, we wouldn't see so many sensationalistic headlines. It's sad really.
the outrage here would be just as bad if it were a dollar.
he is suing the kid, not a school, or organization.
If people really understood how the process worked, we wouldn't see so many sensationalistic headlines. It's sad really.
the outrage here would be just as bad if it were a dollar.
he is suing the kid, not a school, or organization.
Maybe this was the kid's helmet:
Counter sue for improper protective equipment. Endangering lives, psychological trauma.
I found the kids diagrams. Turns out it wasn't even a Baseball helmet, pain and suffering indeed.
I am a lawyer and I agree.This is why lawyers suck.
I am a lawyer and I agree.
And... this explains everything.The former coach is a chiropractor, so maybe he was used to making fraudulent claims...?
At first I thought he filed it pro se, but, nope, he has an attorney. He's not getting anything from the kid, so I have to imagine he's named the league itself in his suit and is targeting their insurance.I'm shocked that he found an attorney willing to take this case.
Probably did it because he knew it would drum up some publicity.
Counter sue for improper protective equipment. Endangering lives, psychological trauma.
This kid is going to have to save up a lot of allowance money.
(Do kids still get allowance money?)
They just sue parents for it now, that way they don't miss any payments.
I don't know if its true or not but if the helmet was thrown like a fribsee and the bill of the helmet caughthim directly on his achilles, then I could see it as a possibility that he got hurt. I doubt he was injured that badly though.
Without going into the specific merits of this particular case since I am not a lawyer and there's a good chance that neither are you, my understanding is that you do have to sue the child as well as anybody else who might be responsible - the courts can decide that the child was, say, 25% responsible and that the parents were 25% responsible and that you were 50% responsible, and if you only sue the parents in that situation you only get a quarter of your losses, rather than half.
Notreally. I mean yes, but not really. Even professional baseball players sometimes throw their helmet off siding a home run. Just look at the winning home run for the Blue Jays in 1992. This kid could be looking up to these players, and copied what they do.I would say getting hit by a player throwing his helmet is not the same as getting hit by a line drive.
Are we sure the coach didn't get the tear when trying to dodge the baseball helmet?
I doubt the strike of the helmet could do that.
Beck says he went into shock after the helmet hit, and he thinks the player threw the helmet at him. His attorney points out that helmet-throwing is not part of the game. The coach is suing his player, the Paris family and the league for more than $500,000 in damages.
Kung Lao?
Maybe this was the kid's helmet:
If he has a legitimate injury, it's what he is supposed to do. The aim is to get money from his parents' liability/homeowners insurance not the kid himself. Standard procedure if a minor causes an injury to someone. The pain and suffering claim is excessive but he should be reimbursed for medical expenses and lost wages if his claim is valid.
Notreally. I mean yes, but not really. Even professional baseball players sometimes throw their helmet off siding a home run. Just look at the winning home run for the Blue Jays in 1992. This kid could be looking up to these players, and copied what they do.
If the kid did recklessly throw his helmet and injure the guy, he should pay the medical bills, but not $500k pain and suffering.
While that may be an available legal pathway, nobody in America is obliged to sue children for their misfortune.
That is disgusting imagine being held liable for hundreds of thousands dollars because you threw your helmet off? Wtf is wrong with this guy.