http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/call_of_duty_2_performance_ati_nvidia/page3.asp
Closest Single Card solution is an X1800XT @ 50FPS
Closest Single Card solution is an X1800XT @ 50FPS
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
COD2 Benchmarks...AMD2800 2GB 7800GT SLI > X360 !
- Thread starter Helznicht
- Start date
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
Looks like 7800 and X1800 in general are close to the X360 performance in this game in comparable resolution and AA setup (~50FPS average translates to somewhat unsteady 60FPS in X360 version)
No surprises that SLI setup get much higher performance of course.
No surprises that SLI setup get much higher performance of course.
So where is the page where they test the 360 version? Can't seem to find it.
It would be very impressive if the xbox 360 game would run at the same detail levels, same aa, af levels and still be faster. It's probably impossible since 512MB video cards give the game a substantial boost and that's the total memory the 360 has.
It would be very impressive if the xbox 360 game would run at the same detail levels, same aa, af levels and still be faster. It's probably impossible since 512MB video cards give the game a substantial boost and that's the total memory the 360 has.
i dont know if the final 360 game is a lot diferent but the version i played some days ago looks worse than a mid range pc,the textures were worse,the soldiers got less detail ( i zoomed with the weapons just to have a good look ) and it was not a demo it got all the levels on it,i tried stalingrad,the desert etc,i was expecting much more,i hope the version i played was a unfinised beta of some sort,cause the textures or effects on the characters were inferior to the pc one and i not talking a super pc,just a normal one with a 9800 pro 128 mgs
Mr Gump said:
No. The 430Mhz 7800GTX is called...7800GTX. I'm not sure if the new 512MB/550Mhz version is still just called GTX, but I heard it may be called GTX-U (presumably the U is for Ultra). Someone with the new GTX has said that it beats the X1800XT in every test he's tried sofar, including in CoD2 (the others were Doom 3, Half-Life 2, Battlefield 2, Quake 4 and F.E.A.R) - though he didn't say by what margins, or at what resolution/aa/af. I guess we'll find out on Monday (it launches then, i think).
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
Well, I haven't played the COD2 and I'm extremely wary of any framerate comments from others, be it positive or negative, but I remember that framerate that averages to 50FPS on 60FPS capped PC game looks very smooth when you are playing. I know I couldn't believe in some instance when I saw an average like that and actually thought that benchmark could be wrong. Basically what looked like a dip here and a stutter there, seemed to 'ruin' the average.Shompola said:
wasnt cod2 developed on pc?
we all know a game needs to be coded from ground up w tiling on x360 to get free AA etc.
so this comparison is pointless.
on a side note: the new 5.11 cats are rumoured to give the 1800xt another performance increase. was they used in those 7800gtx512 vs 1800xt512 tests?
we all know a game needs to be coded from ground up w tiling on x360 to get free AA etc.
so this comparison is pointless.
on a side note: the new 5.11 cats are rumoured to give the 1800xt another performance increase. was they used in those 7800gtx512 vs 1800xt512 tests?
snatches said:
yeah..im a great call of duty( and every ww2 fps) fan,i played to the death call of duty 1 and expansion,and cod2 on the pc,i wanted the 360 version to be a lot better than the pc but was not the case with the 360 version i played,iam telling what i saw nothing more nothing less,and NO the game its not locked at 60 fps,in north africa some times the game struggles ( more frecuently when u use the smoke grenades)maybe the final game its different,i dunno
now i have this really great physiologyst,who will treat ur fanboy problems
gofreak said:
Performance Improvements:
As with most Catalyst® releases, performance has increased in various situations.
The ATI Radeon® X1800 has massive gains in OpenGL when 4X Anti-aliasing is enabled. Increases include:
# Doom 3 performance improvement of up to 38%
# Quake 4 performance improvement of up to 60%
# Older OpenGL titles such as Quake 3, Arena, and Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, have performance improvements of up to 50%
The ATI Radeon® X1300 has a performance improvement of 10-15% in Quake 4.
The Vertex Shader has performance improvement of 3-5% across multiple products.
just so you know
Parallax Scroll
Banned
Man, I can't wait till my new video card gets here. It comes with CoD2 as well.
why do people always forget consoles are streamlined for game play, optimized busses, direct pathways, its not just about comparing the #s
btw i have 2 7800gtx in SLI with an AMD 4800+ and 2gb DDR and i have played COD2 on PC so as soon as i get my 360 this week i will tell u if it indeed does look better
btw i have 2 7800gtx in SLI with an AMD 4800+ and 2gb DDR and i have played COD2 on PC so as soon as i get my 360 this week i will tell u if it indeed does look better
Shogmaster
Sloppy seconds
Divus Masterei said:
I'll counter your bare anecdotal observation with my own. I ran the same demo level on my P4 3Ghz with X800Pro PC with 2GB of RAM, and there are alot of differences in the demos: X360 version has a heat haze effect that's not in the PC demo. The textures and models look about the same. The smoke effect looks a liitle different too in the X360 version in that within the smoke, you get a clear deliniation of the guys inside of it (I don't know if that's a "better" FX, or even a bug, but it's a difference).
My set up ran the demo on 1024x768 with everything at high and AA @ 4X and got about 45fps average. It would go as low as 10ish fps for a short stretch and high as 60 ish. The X360 version is pretty much hanging around at 60fps, with some explosion moment being lower than that for an instant. But it's pretty much 60 all the time. Only thing is that I think the X360 version was running @ only 2X AA.
Dr.Guru of Peru
played the long game
The heat haze effect and all that nice stuff was in the PC demo, just not on cards w/o SM3
Shogmaster
Sloppy seconds
Zer0 said:
I'm comparing the same map (Egypt) character models and textures only like a sane person would. Why in the hell are you bringing up Russian level when the X360 kiosk only has the Egypt demo?
Dr.Guru of Peru
played the long game
Well...doesnt the 6600 GT have SM3? That would be a midrange card. But whatever.
Really I didn't think the X360 demo of this game I played looked impressive at all. The textures weren't very good and there was aliasing. But I didn't think the PC demo looked any good either. It's really just not a very impressive looking game. It doesn't even have any physics. You can put 2 whole clips into a wooden box with muddy looking textures and nothing even happens. I don't remember even seeing any bullet holes, but I may be wrong. But basically this is not a good game to gauge graphics capabilities in my opinion. The textures didn't indicate a 8x increase in ram from an xbox game in my opinion.
In other news: grass is still green.
If anybody really thought that a $400 piece of hardware is better than a $3000 one he should also get his mind checked.
Will your 360 render this game in 1600x1200 with 6xAA, 8xAF and smooth 60 fps?
I know a $3000 PC will and arguing otherwise is just silly.
On the other hand for $3000 (we're talking TOP of the line PC, 7800 GTX SLI w 1GB of VRAM, 2 GB etc.) you could get 4 Xbox 360s and around 30 games so there is really no point in this whole goddamn thread.
PC elitists will tell you: "told ya!", console guys "it's not worth the cash!" so please stop now.
If anybody really thought that a $400 piece of hardware is better than a $3000 one he should also get his mind checked.
Will your 360 render this game in 1600x1200 with 6xAA, 8xAF and smooth 60 fps?
I know a $3000 PC will and arguing otherwise is just silly.
On the other hand for $3000 (we're talking TOP of the line PC, 7800 GTX SLI w 1GB of VRAM, 2 GB etc.) you could get 4 Xbox 360s and around 30 games so there is really no point in this whole goddamn thread.
PC elitists will tell you: "told ya!", console guys "it's not worth the cash!" so please stop now.
Shogmaster said:
I changed the demo as soon as the guy got off the jeep, because I was too unimpressed with it to continue, so I'm not sure if it gets exponentially better looking latter on. But what I saw on the jeep was some funny-boy-scout-looking soldiers, which seemed rather blocky and unimpressive, amidst a cheap looking desert. None of the textures seemed relatively impressive, and I was expecting better IQ.
From what I recall of HL2 I think it was better looking. I was expecting this to blow out that game, given it runs at a decent framerate on my lowly 6600gt. I've to agree with others that of the 3 demos this one was definitely the least impressive.
hukasmokincaterpillar
Member
Anyone know for sure whether or not CoD2 on 360 has any level of anisotropic filtering enabled? Supposedly the demos are only using bilinear leaving the image quality a bit lacking. There's some varying accounts out there but havent really seen a straight answer on this.
Shogmaster said:
because i played a near finish version with all levels?dont get my wrong,i love this game,i have preordered it,but im very anal with little details,and the first russian mission when u encounter the training officer in pc version u can see a lot of details on textures on his face,greatcoat,etc,much of these details are lost on the 360 version i played,i hope the final version is better
Fuma said:
good way to respect other´s opinions, the funy thing idiot xbot,its this game ( cod360) its the first game i have on preorder with my 360
if u wanna read only good impresions go to teamxbox forums moroon,im bored of fucking xbots trolls atacking everyone who doesn´t follow his way
nextgeneration
Member
Zer0, how were you able to play a near finished version of this with all the levels?
nextgeneration said:
in a microsoft presentation in germany for retailers and press ppl,they got several games there, ( some of them in the HD of the console,a debug system) i played some games there,pgr3,cod2.kameo,ninety nine nights,doa4 and pd0
also i remember when i boot the second russian level the one when u got to fix some comns cable u start with a female sniper,the face and textures on the pc model of this female were superb,the 360 were a lot poorer,i dont know im talking only what i saw,i repeat maybe the final version is much better or they haven implemented the effects yet on that build
nextgeneration
Member
Zer0, when did this presentation take place? Was it recent or awhile back?