Yeah, I dunno. If they go undefeated and Oregon still goes the season with only 2 losses or so, it'll still look pretty good. The thing is, BSU has been performing at that level for what, five years now? The only one close to them is Utah, and all these other mid-majors are one or two year flashes in the pan. So I wouldn't write off BSU just yet.NewLib said:Even if Boise State wins this game, one win doesnt make you one of the best teams in the country. Boise State is never going to get respect as long as the WAC is as bad as it is. If Boise State was in the MWC and beat Oregon along with TCU/Utah/BYU then they have a much better case.
whytemyke said:Yeah, I dunno. If they go undefeated and Oregon still goes the season with only 2 losses or so, it'll still look pretty good. The thing is, BSU has been performing at that level for what, five years now? The only one close to them is Utah, and all these other mid-majors are one or two year flashes in the pan. So I wouldn't write off BSU just yet.
whytemyke said:Yeah, I dunno. If they go undefeated and Oregon still goes the season with only 2 losses or so, it'll still look pretty good. The thing is, BSU has been performing at that level for what, five years now? The only one close to them is Utah, and all these other mid-majors are one or two year flashes in the pan. So I wouldn't write off BSU just yet.
whytemyke said:Yeah, I dunno. If they go undefeated and Oregon still goes the season with only 2 losses or so, it'll still look pretty good. The thing is, BSU has been performing at that level for what, five years now? The only one close to them is Utah, and all these other mid-majors are one or two year flashes in the pan. So I wouldn't write off BSU just yet.
StoOgE said:TCU has probably has a similar talent level to those two teams and has consistently scheduled tougher opponents to boot.
FWIW, I don't think the MWC is all that mid major any more. I have a hard time saying the Big East or ACC is too far ahead of them at this point.
Yeah. No. I'm usually against the Big10 hate to begin with but that's a pretty ridiculous statement. Top to bottom? No way.NewLib said:MWC is better than the Big East and has been better than the Big East. I dont see how anyone can argue that. The funny thing is that if it wasnt for Ohio St, I think MWC is better top to bottom than the Big 10.
whytemyke said:Yeah. No. I'm usually against the Big10 hate to begin with but that's a pretty ridiculous statement. Top to bottom? No way.
NewLib said:MWC is better than the Big East and has been better than the Big East. I dont see how anyone can argue that. The funny thing is that if it wasnt for Ohio St, I think MWC is better top to bottom than the Big 10.
MyFaceIsOnFire said:I really do not feel sorry for Oregon fans. I have a hard time figuring out which I hate more, Oregon fans or Red Sox fans.
StoOgE said:Their co-eds are crazy hot though.
NewLib said:Maybe I did overreach with MWC being better than the Big 10, but I think the post is they are more in the conversation with the Big 10 than the Big 10 is with SEC/Big 12.
Also, I think ACC gets a lot more crap then the conference deserves. The problem is there is no elite teams. Just 2-3 very good ones and 4-5 good ones. Its a surprisingly deep conference right now.
StoOgE said:I think they have 2-3 good teams and 4-5 average teams.
If you drop Texas Tech in the ACC over the last 5 years they would have very likely walked away with as many conference titles.
iamblades said:I love all the amateurish shit the first week of a season.
It's like everyone forgets how to do everything. Even ESPN. Did you guys see the TEAM LOGO placeholder on the stat sheets?
:lol :lol
NewLib said:I know thats not true because in 2007 they lost to an ACC team in a Bowl game. They probably would have won last year but other years they probably would have been competitive, though not a sure thing they win the title.
StoOgE said:Nope. They won that game against UVA