BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
I don't really care about gooner slop but it's not setting a good precedent. Pressure the credit card companies and they will cave.
The twitch thots are on their radar now. They posted about itso whats to stop them from moving on from games and onto things like only fans and streamers they dont approve of.
GTA 2 just got delisted. Karens are never happy and it's wrong to assume that will appease them
Hell, they were still processing payments to only fans content that contained CSAM and actual sexual assault material. They finally stopped when investigators got involved.Money. Porn makes billions of dollars every year and credit cards get a piece of that revenue.
Hell, they were still processing payments to only fans content that contained CSAM and actual sexual assault material. They finally stopped when investigators got involved.
You can(could) release whatever on Steam and itch ESRB/CERO/USK/PEGI/ACB dont actually look at those game unless someone makes a huff, because Steam/Itch doesnt require games to be rated by a ratings board to release on the service.
Console releases usually if not always go through the ratings system.
FYI.
When your defense of something is "what about" that other thing.
Its called a whataboutism and its very poor like literally not even a defense.
If you want to defend Rape and Incest games, defend them, dont point fingers at other games because thats not the topic at hand.
You want to defend Rape and Incest games, start your sentence with "Leave the Rape and Incest games on Steam because........" Then continue from there with your argument.
If you would like to go back to the Assassins Creed thread to discuss a Black Samurai killing people...not random people FYI we can totally go to that thread to justify why Assassins Creed allows the killing of what in universe would be considered bad people (their race should be irrelevent but you brought it up).
![]()
Crying "whataboutism" is as intellectually lazy as anything. That term gets thrown around anytime someone tries to contextualize something or provide a valid analogue. It's a really easy way to handwave a salient point that someone doesn't like and for some reason, a lot of people just accept that like it's the end-all-be-all argument. Which it isn't.
They did it with GTAV.
And they got it removed from a number of stores (in Australia, just to be clear).
I literally told the poster we could go discuss yasuke killing people in the AC thread.
But saying how come rape and incest isnt allowed when i can be black and kill asian people is literally a whatabutism.
They are totally different topics, how exactly are we supposed to have a discussion about rape and incest relating it to being a black samurai in japan killing japanese people?
Then trying to use the slippery slope argument of; well one is a crime and the other is a crime too so either they both get banned or none get banned.
Come on man which argument are you gonna call intellectually lazy?
Target and Kmart according to articles.I was living in Australia when GTAV (XB1/PS4) came out.......i bought the disk at either EB of JB.
Which one was banned or was it banned down the line?
Target and Kmart removed GTAV due to feminazi online petitions in Australia.I was living in Australia when GTAV (XB1/PS4) came out.......i bought the disk at either EB of JB.
Which one was banned or was it banned down the line?
Exactly my point, it's the payment processors own policy and these groups just ratted out a client to them. They don't really have any sway on the megacorps. It would be like saying I have sway/influence on the mods if I were to report something here that's against the ToS. I don't really, I'm just ratting somebody out for breaking policy.Payment processors are using these groups as masquerade for their own decisions. A megacorp would NEVER pay any attention to a random bunch of deranged women if they were not fully on board with it.
Stop thinking that organizations like this or Sweet Baby would have any sway without the massive backing of megacorps. This is not how the real world works.
Holy freaking hypocrisy on steroids. The parasite that made a career trying to censor and actually managed to damage the videogame industry in the west about sexualized women in videogames, now is also against the payment processors because it puts in danger "sex workers".
![]()
If you're comfortable with special interest groups and payment processors dictating what you, as an adult, can read, watch, or play, eventually you'll get the content you deserve.I think Rape and Incest games are weird and have no issue with them being removed.
Conversely.
I literally wouldnt even know Steam had Rape and Incest games if it werent for these groups talking about removing them.
Holy freaking hypocrisy on steroids. The parasite that made a career trying to censor and actually managed to damage the videogame industry in the west about sexualized women in videogames, now is also against the payment processors because it puts in danger "sex workers".
![]()
Do you know who else "claims responsibility" when bad things happen in public view?![]()
The group had already been closely linked with the situation, which has seen Itch.io and Steam scramble to appease payment providers like Visa as they suddenly took an interest in the kind of games available on the platforms, especially those which contravened rules and "standards" the payment providers apparently had. It led to Itch.io deindexing all NSFW content from its browse and search pages, and Steam introducing vague new rules about adult content, while removing a slew of games.
Collective Shout shared a timeline of the campaign on its website, noting how it began with No Mercy, a game which involves extreme sexual violence, being brought to its in March. The group's actions - a mixture of petitioning, emailing, and lobbying - began in early April and led to the game being removed from sale later that month.
Article: "We approached payment processors because Steam did not respond" - Australian pressure group Collective Shout claims responsibility for Steam and Itch.io NSFW game removal
Holy freaking hypocrisy on steroids. The parasite that made a career trying to censor and actually managed to damage the videogame industry in the west about sexualized women in videogames, now is also against the payment processors because it puts in danger "sex workers".
![]()
Gaslighting myself cause I didn't know about that bit about them defending heinous shit you mentioned. If that's the case, then you're right, they suck. Sorry if I'm ignorant, not embedded in the goonsphere.Yeah, that's why they publicly DEFEND MOVIES LIKE CUTIES AND POOR THINGS, which promote pedophilia.
Fucking hell, either you are extremely gaslighting or you ignore what this is about. It's about censorship and power, nothing more.
Bonus track: let the actual pedos go unchecked, exactly as the MeToo and other fake pro-women groups.
Payment processors are using these groups as masquerade for their own decisions. A megacorp would NEVER pay any attention to a random bunch of deranged women if they were not fully on board with it.
Stop thinking that organizations like this or Sweet Baby would have any sway without the massive backing of megacorps. This is not how the real world works.
Do you believe they will stop and do nothing while you laugh ha ha ha it's just those weird gooner games. Well, your games will be next.
That's not all. They called everyone who defends freedom of expression a sex offender. Which from my point of view increases the odds they're a bunch of projecting chomos significantly.Have you heard the news? Collective Shout just gave an interview. They said that legality is not the defining factor.
They won't stop at this. They will try to ban every last bit of even mildy sexual content/themes. They will come for everything. Paypal already debanked Valve in several countries due to this.
Also, Collective shout wanted to ban GTA V and Detroit Become Human once. Do you believe they will stop and do nothing while you laugh ha ha ha it's just those weird gooner games. Well, your games will be next.
I've come to the conclusion that Collective Shout has at least a few child abusers amongst their ranks, because these types of organisations always do.I've come to the conclusion that "Collective Shout" are nothing but paid actors
It's hilarious how woke ideology keeps flip flopping on this issue.Holy freaking hypocrisy on steroids. The parasite that made a career trying to censor and actually managed to damage the videogame industry in the west about sexualized women in videogames, now is also against the payment processors because it puts in danger "sex workers".
![]()
Nice to read a thoughtful and sensible take on this issue for once. I appreciate it.I'll say the same thing I said in the other thread on this topic. I'm a fan a free speech. I also recognize that it can't be used as an excuse to allow illegal perversions and other nonsense to be normalized. I'm just providing an alternate perspective. Thankfully, Steam has a nice feature to filter out all that nonsense, which I have turned on. I returned to PC gaming about 2 years ago and was floored at all the crazy messed up games that are other there. Be it incest, pedophilia, beastality, rape, goofy fetishes, etc. It's all out there. I think it is normal for a strong company, as well as normal people for that matter, to want to distance themselves from and avoid their own brand being tied to heinous nonsense. It's perfectly rational for a company to say "I don't want my brand tied to enabling Cousin Pissing On You Simulator 3.0". I get it. Is there a balance that has to be struck to ensure the true reality of freedom of speech is protected? Of course. However, the creation or distribution of obscene materials is not protected by freedom of speech, as determined by the courts in Roth vs. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957). It's not a crutch that allows you to do whatever the hell you want
Have you heard the news? Collective Shout just gave an interview. They said that legality is not the defining factor.
That's not all. They called everyone who defends freedom of expression a sex offender. Which from my point of view increases the odds they're a bunch of projecting chomos significantly.
The world is apparently full of some Dr. Pizza ass bitches just waiting to self report.
I mean, that organization vehemently defended Cuties so...I've come to the conclusion that Collective Shout has at least a few child abusers amongst their ranks, because these types of organisations always do.
This group just doesn't pass the smell test. They are paid for by some billionare somewhere and are whitewashing for him or her.I've come to the conclusion that Collective Shout has at least a few child abusers amongst their ranks, because these types of organisations always do.
Link?
Most likely, as it has been with the trans movement. I cant remember the name of the organisation now, but JRE had Graham Linehan on a while ago, who spoke about it. Worth a listen for those who dont know much about it, how deep the rabbit hole goes.This group just doesn't pass the smell test. They are paid for by some billionare somewhere and are whitewashing for him or her.
Activists (primarily on the left but it works for everyone) in recent years have found the credit card processors, banks, and payment processors to be a "weak link" that they can hammer to get their chosen policy through in the absence of everything else working. We really need to have Congress pass a law that says that payment processors MUST process any legal transaction between two legal entities, be they corporations or people or charities or whatever. They absolutely have to be content and viewpoint neutral. This really cannot stand.
Maybe in a lot of cases it involves the abuse of minors, i think. Only explanation i can come up with.How is incest sexualized violence?
As expected, these are the culture warriors that put a foot in the door with people covering for them… calling other gooners or defending some despicable / illegal stuff… and then they take off their masks once they have been able to exploit the digital feudal lords / monopolists or duopolists that control the basic transactions themselves.![]()
"Legality Is Not The Defining Factor": Steam Censorship Campaign Details It Seeks Removal Of Games Whether Legal Or Not
"If Steam and itch.io had been moderating their platforms as they should have, there would have been no need to temporarily delist games."www.thegamer.com
Activists (primarily on the left but it works for everyone) in recent years have found the credit card processors, banks, and payment processors to be a "weak link" that they can hammer to get their chosen policy through in the absence of everything else working. We really need to have Congress pass a law that says that payment processors MUST process any legal transaction between two legal entities, be they corporations or people or charities or whatever. They absolutely have to be content and viewpoint neutral. This really cannot stand.
Nice to read a thoughtful and sensible take on this issue for once. I appreciate it.
The minute you create a distinction between 'true' and 'non-true' forms of speech you award the power of those in charge to decide which is which. Freedom of speech and expression has to be protected universally, or we give those in power the right to decide what is and isn't okay to say. The minute you do that, you open the door for totalitarianism. It started in the UK with banning the occasional mad mullah from preaching 'Death to the West' in the middle of town, now it's being used to imprison people for telling jokes, protesting wars, refusing to address people with their preferred pronouns or expressing an unpopular opinion.I'll say the same thing I said in the other thread on this topic. I'm a fan a free speech. I also recognize that it can't be used as an excuse to allow illegal perversions and other nonsense to be normalized. I'm just providing an alternate perspective. Thankfully, Steam has a nice feature to filter out all that nonsense, which I have turned on. I returned to PC gaming about 2 years ago and was floored at all the crazy messed up games that are other there. Be it incest, pedophilia, beastality, rape, goofy fetishes, etc. It's all out there. I think it is normal for a strong company, as well as normal people for that matter, to want to distance themselves from and avoid their own brand being tied to heinous nonsense. It's perfectly rational for a company to say "I don't want my brand tied to enabling Cousin Pissing On You Simulator 3.0". I get it. Is there a balance that has to be struck to ensure the true reality of freedom of speech is protected? Of course. However, the creation or distribution of obscene materials is not protected by freedom of speech, as determined by the courts in Roth vs. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957). It's not a crutch that allows you to do whatever the hell you want
No one forces you to buy that stuff. If you want it to vanish than it needs to vanish from every fictional art....movies, books etc.. But what do you achieve than? Are we really pretending if we censor the shit out of fictional art, it wont happen anymore in reality!? Might be a hot take, but I would assume that if you take the opportunity away from people to live out their fantasies in fictional art...they might just wanna live it out in reality instead.In all honesty, rape and incest themes in video games are weird as f... and the sooner they vanish forever the better.