Spring-Loaded
Member
Any walls of shame yet?
I don't hate the guy. And I get he gets a pass with his history. I get it. But damn, should he really be able to claim outright falsehoods without any consequence whatsoever? I'm not suggesting a ban or anything like that. And I'm a junior member here. I know this. But it just feels icky to me that he can say things are one way, we find out they're the other, and it's okay because he was right before. Especially when a lot of the things he says can be open to interpretation/unprovable or are pretty widely known to begin with.
I'd also like to say it's totally possible he was intentionally given false info to find the rat. But even if that's the case, shouldn't like a warning be in order? Again, I'm a nobody here and just sharing my thoughts on this.
I don't hate the guy. And I get he gets a pass with his history. I get it. But damn, should he really be able to claim outright falsehoods without any consequence whatsoever? I'm not suggesting a ban or anything like that. And I'm a junior member here. I know this. But it just feels icky to me that he can say things are one way, we find out they're the other, and it's okay because he was right before. Especially when a lot of the things he says can be open to interpretation/unprovable or are pretty widely known to begin with.
I'd also like to say it's totally possible he was intentionally given false info to find the rat. But even if that's the case, shouldn't like a warning be in order? Again, I'm a nobody here and just sharing my thoughts on this.
I don't hate the guy. And I get he gets a pass with his history. I get it. But damn, should he really be able to claim outright falsehoods without any consequence whatsoever? I'm not suggesting a ban or anything like that. And I'm a junior member here. I know this. But it just feels icky to me that he can say things are one way, we find out they're the other, and it's okay because he was right before. Especially when a lot of the things he says can be open to interpretation/unprovable or are pretty widely known to begin with.
I'd also like to say it's totally possible he was intentionally given false info to find the rat. But even if that's the case, shouldn't like a warning be in order? Again, I'm a nobody here and just sharing my thoughts on this.
Rightfully so.
I really think false info was set free to try and catch leakers... If he had not been really sure about the release date of a freakin' next gen console, he would have not told!
He had plenty of other truthfacts in this dump of information and he could have just skipped that one if he was not so sure about it. Watch out cboat.
Still part of #teamCBOAT though!
Oh please. This person has probably stuck his neck out on the proverbial chopping block numerous times to get us the juicy tidbits. So he got information wrong. That's the risk you take and it could cost him his job. It honestly just sounds like mad Xbone fans calling for blood since all the info Cboat has provided over the last few months has been mainly negative toward MS.
What confirmed insider got permed for wrong sources?Other people had gotten permabanned for having wrong sources also. Some of them just posting inside a thread, not making one and clamoring to be a fact.
Are you telling me that Gaf law doesn't apply if you are popular enough?
Only 2 real verifiable truthfacts and one of them is already wrong. I no longer believe in the whisperings of this buttocks.
And that is exactly what he really does. He just copies the methods of Nostradamus to make it seem like he knows stuff before anyone else by being vague enough to be right. Of course then there are those mad followers who interpret everything that really happens in a way so it can be a result of cboat's predictions. Like Masterchief walking around in a cloak. "Oh he must've mistaken that for Prince of Persia"
There was a very strict policy here for insider knowledge, be right or be gone. It seems cboat got greedy, wanted even more attention and failed.
"CBOAT was set up" is a pretty amusing theory, even if completely unsubstantiated and/or illogical.
Other people had gotten permabanned for having wrong sources also. Some of them just posting inside a thread, not making one and clamoring to be a fact.
Are you telling me that Gaf law doesn't apply if you are popular enough?
"CBOAT was set up" is a pretty amusing theory, even if completely unsubstantiated and/or illogical.
I really think false info was set free to try and catch leakers... If he had not been really sure about the release date of a freakin' next gen console, he would have not told!
He had plenty of other truthfacts in this dump of information and he could have just skipped that one if he was not so sure about it. Watch out cboat.
Still part of #teamCBOAT though!
Sadly this is how things are. Especially with the PS4 date.
Do you really think huge corporations won't try to flush out leakers?
What confirmed insider got permed for wrong sources?
Is CBOAT getting banned? With the False rumors and all that jazz?
yeah. I've seen generic gaffers repost some "shocking" news they read on some other board, spreading unsubstantiated rumors. But banning insiders for tips that take bad turns might eventually leave you with no insiders.
Since cboat is a mod alt I highly doubt it lolIs CBOAT getting banned? With the False rumors and all that jazz?
He was never a Sony insider to begin with.
Which is why that "truthfact" from alot of people is considered an outlier.
Not confirmed insiders, but I remember some poster before the Xbox One reveal that had his sources saying the One ram was GDDR5 and Sony matched. Obviously his sources was wrong and he was permabanned for his BS.
Basically. Hpw some of you are calling for a ban is beyond me.Oh please. This person has probably stuck his neck out on the proverbial chopping block numerous times to get us the juicy tidbits. So he got information wrong. That's the risk you take and it could cost him his job. It honestly just sounds like mad Xbone fans calling for blood since all the info Cboat has provided over the last few months has been mainly negative toward MS.
Not confirmed insiders, but I remember some poster before the Xbox One reveal that had his sources saying the One ram was GDDR5 and Sony matched. Obviously his sources was wrong and he was permabanned for his BS.
There are only really 2 lay-man verifiable leaks here.
fact #1 - unverifiable, no one is gonna break NDA to confirm it and if they deny it you can call damage control / pr.
fact #2 - unverifiable, no one is gonna break NDA to confirm it and if they deny it you can call damage control / pr.
fact # 3 - This one is really good. We've had rumours of late Oct release so not unheard of. Verifiable
fact # 4 - This one is really, really, really good. This is a huge claim that already has people dying. Verifiable
fact #5 - semiverifiable, possibility someone confirms it/denies it but the layman can't really do much.
fact #6 - already known
fact #7 - not a fact
So really while this seems super exciting, we only really have 2 #truthfacts that we can actually confirm are #truthfacts. One of which we already have rumours from another source.
10 years of pretty much bang-on leaks means that he skates.I don't hate the guy. And I get he gets a pass with his history. I get it. But damn, should he really be able to claim outright falsehoods without any consequence whatsoever? I'm not suggesting a ban or anything like that. And I'm a junior member here. I know this. But it just feels icky to me that he can say things are one way, we find out they're the other, and it's okay because he was right before. Especially when a lot of the things he says can be open to interpretation/unprovable or are pretty widely known to begin with.
I'd also like to say it's totally possible he was intentionally given false info to find the rat. But even if that's the case, shouldn't like a warning be in order? Again, I'm a nobody here and just sharing my thoughts on this.
Other people had gotten permabanned for having wrong sources also. Some of them just posting inside a thread, not making one and clamoring to be a fact.
Are you telling me that Gaf law doesn't apply if you are popular enough?
I think, if not banned, he should be warned and told not to share iffy info again. He has a history of hits but the misses are really piling up and if other people made some of the claims he did they wouldn't have an account right now.