But this is going to be the generation of CA isn't it...
Hopefully we can just turn it off on PC.
It is...Destiny and Alien Isolation are just the start.=O
And then The Order, Batman...
But this is going to be the generation of CA isn't it...
It is...Destiny and Alien Isolation are just the start.=O
Great screens, game looks good. You don't have to quote them though...everyone posts theirs in their native resAlien Isolation PS4 shots
Links for the rest
http://imageshack.com/a/img907/8666/PtRno2.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img631/3518/KK1STZ.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img537/8073/2ffb9x.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img743/9509/HMSM7m.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img673/4476/xeojil.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img912/7065/OOzSC7.jpg
Really? Looks to me like it has no AA at all. And CA is an IQ flaw IMO. It certainly is in the view of photographers.
Chromatic Aberration.What's CA?
I don't see the lack of AA people are talking about. Looks like there is clearly a FXAA solution being used to me.
The CA makes it harder to tell, but the more I look the more sure I am.
Really? Looks to me like it has no AA at all. And CA is an IQ flaw IMO. It certainly is in the view of photographers.
It just doesn't look sharp enough for me to believe there is no AA. The whole image looks soft in the way a post AA solution produces. It doesn't look all that off from BF4 for instance.
I mean, Wolfenstein:TNO is a game with no AA, and it SHOWS:
keyword: IMO
a lot of people, myself included, love chromatic aberration
It's not merely an opinion. CA objectively destroys detail, therefore it's shit for image quality.
Of course, you can prefer it for aesthetic reasons, much like how some people like to put sharpening filter on full throttle.
Hey you're the one who said imo.
keyword: IMO
a lot of people, myself included, love chromatic aberration
It looks good, there's that. There's a reason that people use it, it's because they like it and most people reacted positively to it.What's to love about CA? I can think of virtually nothing.
Oops my bad, the other person did.I did?
I don't really like them when they aren't representative of the game's image quality (like most racers' photo modes), but I don't think it's prohibited.
I don't see why not. People post pics that aren't representative of gameplay all the time. Forza isn't the only game, that's posted, with a photo mode that allows people to alter the image (DoF, filters, strange camera angles, etc)Are we allowed to post FH2 photos in here then? I thought posting photos that aren't representative of gameplay was frowned upon. FH2 looks good in game but the photomode IQ is definitely noticeably better.
If so I have about 30 of my own that I can pick from....
I think there is an easy solution. Just state "photomode" when posting. If that's too much trouble, then well....Are we allowed to post FH2 photos in here then? I thought posting photos that aren't representative of gameplay was frowned upon. FH2 looks good in game but the photomode IQ is definitely noticeably better.
If so I have about 30 of my own that I can pick from....
What's to love about CA? I can think of virtually nothing.
It's not merely an opinion. CA objectively destroys detail, therefore it's shit for image quality.
Of course, you can prefer it for aesthetic reasons, much like how some people like to put sharpening filter on full throttle.
I like CA. I think it looks pretty awesome when its implemented right.
I like all of the extra effects- motion blur, CA, bloom (when used right). I think they all had to the style of the image and make things look awesome. Sue me!
I really believe it defeats the purpose of the thread. I'd really like to see how good a game can look whilst I play. Most of the games which have a photo mode have their own thread for photo shots.I don't see why not. People post pics that aren't representative of gameplay all the time. Forza isn't the only game, that's posted, with a photo mode that allows people to alter the image (DoF, filters, strange camera angles, etc)
Also I don't see any major differences in the photo mode shots unlike with Forza 5 for example.
I agree. If someone wants to know how good FH2 looks, this thread isn't the place for them at the moment. The IQ is clearly improved in photo-mode shots.I really believe it defeats the purpose of the thread. I'd really like to see how good a game can look whilst I play. Most of the games which have a photo mode have their own thread for photo shots.
BEAUTIFUL SHOTSAlien Isolation PS4 shots
Links for the rest
http://imageshack.com/a/img907/8666/PtRno2.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img631/3518/KK1STZ.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img537/8073/2ffb9x.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img743/9509/HMSM7m.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img673/4476/xeojil.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img912/7065/OOzSC7.jpg
I agree. If someone wants to know how good FH2 looks, this thread isn't the place for them at the moment. The IQ is clearly improved in photo-mode shots.
Alien is definitely using FXAA which is a joke if a 6850 can run it maxed at 38 fps
Are we 100% sure photo mode changes the picture quality? It looks the same as in game to me.
Infamous did the same thing and that had loads of pictures in here.
Photo-mode shots are supersampled I believe. They're visibly cleaner than how it looks in-game to me.
That's what I was about to say. This discussion has been going on for far too long.We should allow photomode pics too, it's not like the screenshots in the PC equivalent thread are at very playable framerates either.
Fair enough you believe it but proof would help,I honestly can't tell the difference.
Lets face it it's not like Xbone owners can simply snap an in game shot like on PS4. Also don't recall this topic popping up when we were all posting Infamous shots.
That's what I was about to say. This discussion has been going on for far too long.
Some of you need to check out the PC thread, which predate all the console threads, people take screenshots at resolutions they don't/can't play at just for the sake of IQ. And if we're talking about camera angles, most PC games can be altered to have free cams (some with controllable effects like DoF), so pretty much photomode for every game, and the PC thread is full of these screenshots and everyone is ok with it.
If a game swaps assets when it's in photomode, that's different. But even then, I think just putting "photomode" alongside the title is enough.
PC shots I've posted on GAF have always been at playable fps(60+). Can't speak for everyone though, there's a separate thread for 1fps shots but that one seems to have been forgotten.We should allow photomode pics too, it's not like the screenshots in the PC equivalent thread are at very playable framerates either.
Fair enough you believe it but proof would help,I honestly can't tell the difference.
Lets face it it's not like Xbone owners can simply snap an in game shot like on PS4. Also don't recall this topic popping up when we were all posting Infamous shots.
Just label photo mode shots as photo mode shots to not confuse people and be done with it. If it basically excludes anyone not owning a capture card from posting X1 shots, what's the point of even having this multi format thread?
Until X1 gets a proper screenshot feature, just let people post photo mode shots if an X1 game supports that as its only means of exporting screenshots.
I'm not even sure what you're trying to contend with what I said.
Chromatic aberration is an optical aberration, something that doesn't exist in real life.Not really contending, just giving my opinion that effects like CA I think add to the style and beauty of the image when they are implemented well. You said CA "objectively destroys detail and is shit for IQ", but myself and others don't agree with that. I'm not even sure I know what that means.
Alien Isolation PS4 shots