Agree. I don't understand the mindset that he's somehow looney or fueling loons (which was what was subtly being implied). Dude presents actual data from legit sources, walks through it, tries to offer some light interpretation but is really kind of a fence sitter when it comes to opinions on what it all means despite trying to look for the positive.Based on the stuff I've seen, strikes me as an honest broker of information. His qualifications aren't secret, and seem above board to me.
He shows his data, cites his sources, and doesn't over-dramatize and sensationalize. Not much contrarianism to be found beyond a cautious interest in the therapeutic values of Ivermectin, a topic that's been stupidly politicized when it really had no business being.
Either way I find his stuff infinitely better than most.
Some people just only want to look at the negative and try to put people down.