iawtp.Docpan said:FINISH IT SECRETLY, LEAKZOR VIA BITTORRENT.
I'd imagine the community love helps a lot as far as keeping them motivated. Also, if Square Enix or whomever gets upset about a project at THIS point, their response could be much, much greater if a finished project was all of a sudden out there and couldn't be contained.UltimateMarioMan said:Why don't fangame makers finish their games THEN let pople know about in and downlod it? Then it'd be all over the place before anything could be done about it.
Well, from the Chrono Resurrection page:shuri said:Couldnt just you recycle the engine and work on a real game?
So who knows? Well, other than Zeenbor.We'll be back soon with something new and fresh.
SKluck said:Why don't people just keep their mouths shut and go "SURPRISE!" and release the thing complete? Sure it would suck keeping a secret you think is that cool, but at least you can complete the thing.
epmode said:iawtp.
this project looks incredible. i was also looking forward to that 2d remake of the ocarina of time/majora's mask, but nintendo shut that down, too.
it's sad to see how overly protective japanese companies are of their IPs. george lucas may be the worst person in the world, but it's nice to know that he has no problem with the dozens of fan-made star wars films. hell, every once in a while, something worthwhile is actually made. if nothing else, it helps the fan-base grow.
too late. why did yahoo shut it down then? nintendo had absolutely nothing to do with it?GaimeGuy said:and don't even get me started on that OoT 2D project.
Um, are you saying they started this project with absolutely no intention to release it? At least keeping it quiet they can make a product, release it through other channels. It would be OUT, and couldn't be stopped from spreading. That is the point. Not like they have to put their names and addresses in it anyway.adelgary said:And get your ass sued?
Send screenshots to famitsu and try to play it off as if it was officially from square, would be funny as heck if it was published and every japanese gamers would drool all over it, SE would be in a bad position
if i remember correctly, that person was planning on selling the book.fennec fox said:I mean, it's the same thing as the guy who tried to publish a sequel to Gone with the Wind told from the slaves' point of view -- perhaps it's a good concept for a story, but there's no way it doesn't run afoul of copyright laws.
SKluck said:Um, are you saying they started this project with absolutely no intention to release it? At least keeping it quiet they can make a product, release it through other channels. It would be OUT, and couldn't be stopped from spreading. That is the point. Not like they have to put their names and addresses in it anyway.
DopeyFish said:as long as you don't sell the game, and as long as you don't use any artwork or sounds from the game and you call it a tribute or something... then it should be completely legal, by all means.
Freeburn said:Absolute rubbish. And I'd advise against giving legal advice where you are clearly unqualified to do so.
Copyright & trademark infringement is copyright & trademark infringement, generally motivation or monetary gain doesn't come into it & "Fair Use" rights are a lot narrower than you would believe.
Freeburn
(Speaking as someone who has successfully sued a company for copyright infringement, and is proud of the fact )
Kobun Heat said:It's actually quite dangerous. If you don't protect your IP you run the risk of losing it.
Kobun Heat said:Well, first off there's the common sense logic that if a "Zelda game" is available for free, people will play that instead of Nintendo's. You can argue how much this actually affects them, but there is an effect.
Another potentially more damaging situation is this: if a company doesn't protect its IP, it could get to the point where it is percieved as being in the public domain. If Nintendo didn't go after every use of its characters in a game, then they set themselves up for a situation like this years down the line:
-A company uses Nintendo characters in a game, and sells it.
-Nintendo sues.
-Said company's legal defense is to point to all the times when Nintendo DIDN'T protect the copyright on their characters, allowing other such companies/individuals to use the characters in games.
-Company wins, and Mario/Zelda/what have you becomes de facto in the public domain.
Bluemercury said:There goes the only chance of having a decent Square game on GC not designed by Square.....
DopeyFish said:I was unaware that "likeness" proved useful anymore
neptunes said:That's on the PC no? (it has to be)
Did they even begin start on console work?
because they have to showoff first?UltimateMarioMan said:Why don't fangame makers finish their games THEN let pople know about in and downlod it? Then it'd be all over the place before anything could be done about it.
The Bookerman said:Blizzard has let some other people develop some fan projects.
TekunoRobby said:This project was looking too good and therefor it was cancelled. Although we wouldn't make the mistake but the average consumer could EASILY confuse this for an actual Square project.
If it were just a simple average looking effort would they have even caught wind of it, would they have even cared?TheGreenGiant said:its got nothing with whether it was good or not. Yoy people are unrealistic. Its IP. SE probably just got wind of it. THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL any fan/mod of licensed IP can be made/released without a big lawsuit.
TekunoRobby said:EDIT: I don't pretend to know why or how companies operate but I felt like posting a logical explanation (at least to me). For all accounts and purposes Square might willingly search and hunt down every single project that infringes on their IP (I don't see them doing that however) but I felt that description could possibly represent the general opinion on the matter from a legal standpoint..
SKluck said:It'd be cool as hell if some (good) lawyers did some quid pro quo work like this, it would get them mad publicity. It's usually not about what is legal or not, its about who has more green.
Actually, the book in question was a parody, not a sequel, and (after some legal hassles) got published.fennec fox said:I mean, it's the same thing as the guy who tried to publish a sequel to Gone with the Wind told from the slaves' point of view -- perhaps it's a good concept for a story, but there's no way it doesn't run afoul of copyright laws.
Fennec Fox: Dropping truth like its hot since 19somethingsomethingfennec fox said:My sentiments exactly. If you possess that kind of talent, patience, and drive, don't do fanfiction!
SKluck said:It'd be cool as hell if some (good) lawyers did some quid pro quo work like this, it would get them mad publicity. It's usually not about what is legal or not, its about who has more green.
Sho Nuff said:"My client wants to make a new Ghostbusters movie, but 20th Century Fox will not let him do so. I am here to ensure that justice is served!"
EmSeta said:Here's what you should do. Get a good salesman, go to Square EA, buy some important people lunch and sell them your project. They could probably convince Square to let you develop it as a second-party team.
You have a great project on your hands. Think business!