LegendOfKage
Member
New business venture: making videos for bowling alleys
I preferred the bird.
New business venture: making videos for bowling alleys
Go anti-woke go broke.
Musk doesnt give a fuck about X.
He knows deep inside the world would be a better place without it.
It’s been like that for years.I like X logo/name. But it’s becoming the equivalent of those random spam calls I get on the daily
“Free speech absolutist” sure likes to ban people for criticizing him…
Other than the news about Don Lemon, the rest of this video is about Twitter suspending several accounts that have been especially critical of Israel lately. I personally am very pro Israel, but I stand by what I said above. Musk owes an explanation for the suspension of these accounts. Any major social media platform has a social obligation to allow free speech in a way that isn't biased towards certain beliefs or opinions, and anyone banned from a major social media platform deserves to know EXACTLY why, and what specific post was the reason for their removal.
Why should you fight for the speech of others even when you strongly disagree? Because if they can be silenced, you can be silenced. Because the positions of power deciding you can't criticize Israel today will be the ones deciding that you can't criticize Palestine tomorrow. If you have any kind of understanding of history, you always push for free speech.
As with everything related to Musk and twitter, it will be interesting to see what happens. I still think he should have just kept his mouth shut and built a great platform for content creators.
People were making naked Taylor Swift AI images and sharing them to X.
A website picked up the images.
Taylor decided to go after the website.
Swifties freaked out and started to dox the people who made the images on X.
Elon bans people from searching for "Taylor Swift"
Doesn't look like it is true as I just looked for Taylor Swift and worked normally.
Yeah.... I remember that too. Fun times. Would anyone like to come forward and admit they were wrong? I would honestly have massive respect for anyone that has the integrity to do that
People were making naked Taylor Swift AI images and sharing them to X.
A website picked up the images.
Taylor decided to go after the website.
Swifties freaked out and started to dox the people who made the images on X.
Elon bans people from searching for "Taylor Swift"
Doesn't look like it is true as I just looked for Taylor Swift and worked normally.
Nope
Read the post above. Twitter did not "gut" their trust and safety team. Just because someone says something about Musk / Twitter, that doesn't necessarily make it true. You can check into these things yourself.Honestly, as someone who worked in Trust and Safety, Elon buying Twitter fundamentally gutted it and made it worthless for anything other than “finding the crazies”. The API is trash now and research is loltastic.
Tell that to my friends who were fired from Twitter and how my company changed their policy towards their T&S protocols. Their team is around 20 people and occasional contractors. Advisory boards are gone and transparency reports don't exist anymore.Read the post above. Twitter did not "gut" their trust and safety team. Just because someone says something about Musk / Twitter, that doesn't necessarily make it true. You can check into these things yourself.
I think this comes down to semantics. T&S was gutted if you mean there was a dramatic reduction in moderation staff due to layoffs. T&S was not gutted if you're suggesting what that tweet seemed to be suggesting, which is that twitter had to ban "taylor swift" search results, because no one is there to moderate the platform anymore. That seems to be wrong. After checking into it, I didn't see the AI photos, but I did see someone complaining that they were suspended for linking to them.Tell that to my friends who were fired from Twitter and how my company changed their policy towards their T&S protocols. Their team is around 20 people and occasional contractors. Advisory boards are gone and transparency reports don't exist anymore.
Just very recently they decided to rebuild a T&S center, most likely prepping for the elections.
You can check into these things yourself.
Right, it’s so bad now, so many spam bots, every comment to a post is something complete unrelated or the reply is a video or meme with zero relation to the OG post.And Twitter was never this bad tbh.
Exactly this. It’s impossible to discuss anything in there nowRight, it’s so bad now, so many spam bots, every comment to a post is something complete unrelated or the reply is a video or meme with zero relation to the OG post.
it’s so bizarre how much of a swap it has become. I’m slowing moving towards deleting it tbh.
Yeah, it’s as fucked as anyone with half a brain knew it would be under Musk.
Might be a blessing in disguise.Exactly this. It’s impossible to discuss anything in there now
I don't think that's the main issue with the twitter algorithm right now, but it did ruin the idea of a FREE speech platform. Paying to be heard while speaking in the public square? Seems wrong to me.Who would have thought being able to pay to have your replies boosted to the top would ruin a social media platform? Would take a genius to have predicted that.
It’s exactly the reason why weat the top of every posts replies there is a bunch of garbage and spam.I don't think that's the main issue with the twitter algorithm right now, but it did ruin the idea of a FREE speech platform. Paying to be heard while speaking in the public square? Seems wrong to me.
I think this comes down to semantics. T&S was gutted if you mean there was a dramatic reduction in moderation staff due to layoffs. T&S was not gutted if you're suggesting what that tweet seemed to be suggesting, which is that twitter had to ban "taylor swift" search results, because no one is there to moderate the platform anymore. That seems to be wrong. After checking into it, I didn't see the AI photos, but I did see someone complaining that they were suspended for linking to them.
I am sorry your friends lost their jobs. Unfortunately, old twitter advisory boards advised the company to allow the US government to demand the censorship of legal speech. We also now know that internally, many people at Twitter actually fought this, and that ultimately it was leadership who caved to these demands.
As far as transparency goes, it took several journalists months of uncovered internal emails before people got actual transparency. Nothing about old twitter was transparent. People would be constantly banned and never told why. Twitter made rules up, and retroactively enforced them. If old twitter had consistently enforced transparent moderation, I think your friends would still have their jobs, and Musk would not own twitter. To me, that would be the best timeline.
Not that I think things are great under Musk. Far from it. See post 407 for an example of that. Transparency still sucks, and he still makes some really random and subjective decisions of his own. And yeah, twitter has gotten worse in other ways, too. I'm hoping Jack Dorsey can take the lessons learned and make his next social media platform a lot closer what Twitter was years ago.
As much as I hate Twatter, if it's Zuck controlling the next one instead since Threads is the second biggest now, then you just traded the frying pan for the fireMight be a blessing in disguise.
If Twitter tanks and people bail ship, where social media stupidity doesn't migrate to another site as a zero sum game, society just got better.
Between the sharp rise in bots and fake news, and clout chasers spamming content under every thread in the hopes of getting payoffs from Musk, he’s ruined Twitter/X.
The only people happy about the state of things now are fake news merchants, Russian bots and the extremely gullible people.
Musk himself is happy to dabble into the election interference he blamed the previous Twitter leadership of doing.
What a shitshow.
"Russian bots," weren't really a thing. We only know this thanks to internal emails from Twitter confirming that they did not have a Russian bot problem. They knew this, because they better than anyone had the internal user data to know otherwise. They knew the media was being sold lies, and they could have corrected it, but they didn't say anything due to fear of bad PR. We were all lied to.
That's not to say that Musk didn't make twitter worse in many ways, because he absolutely did.
"Russian bots," weren't really a thing. We only know this thanks to internal emails from Twitter confirming that they did not have a Russian bot problem. They knew this, because they better than anyone had the internal user data to know otherwise. They knew the media was being sold lies, and they could have corrected it, but they didn't say anything due to fear of bad PR. We were all lied to.
That's not to say that Musk didn't make twitter worse in many ways, because he absolutely did.
The Western spooks and their corporate media buddies always project the shady things they're doing to their enemies also opening the way for more censorship in order to control the narrative even better. Reminder that the most reddit addicted city in 2013 was the Eglin airforce base that has a internet propaganda program. That was in 2013 when the propaganda wasn't even that bad.
Nice timing, right when a lot of ‘Texas Independence Party’ accounts were exposed as Russian bots yesterday.
There’s no ‘projection’ here.
Is that like the "Russian bots" in Roy Moore's campaign that turned out to be bots controlled by a billionaire that were made to look like they are from Russia, in a story that broke from New Knowledge, a company full of "former" State Department employees that since has changed its name and continues to "advice" corporate media?
No. It’s not like that at all.
I love how you keep pulling out stories from 2013 and now 2018 to try to invalidate shit that’s happening right now.
X’s algorithms now are being designed to show you shit shoveled by any clown who can pay, with very minimal vetting or verification.
But you’re In luck. This is just hot off the press
I won't deny it is a shit show now. But does the prior regime take any accountability at all for the loss of trust from so many people?Elon Musk had no problem accepting the suppression of free speech by multiple foreign regimes and went as far as saying "if the court says it, how is it illegal?"
Gutting T&S isn't "no moderation", it is the complete lack of good, enforceable guidelines that are discussed as a strategy and not as reactive policy. This takes manpower, research, a robust risk assessment desk, etc.
And yeah, there was a good degree of transparency. Reports were out there and clearly explained much of the platform's policy. Sure, not perfect. Unfortunately, these platforms cause real-world harm and you cannot avoid involvement by law enforcement agencies. Policy is never perfect or self-evident. You try and see if it works, based on evidence or based on pre-conceptions. Many good Twitter policies were very good and simply were thrown away due to ego.
Is that like the "Russian bots" in Roy Moore's campaign that turned out to be bots controlled by a billionaire that were made to look like they are from Russia in a story that broke from New Knowledge, a company full of "former" State Department employees that since has changed its name and continues to "advice" corporate media?
No. It’s not like that at all.
I love how you keep pulling out stories from 2013 and now 2018 to try to invalidate shit that’s happening right now.
If something is actually happening, where's the evidence? Where's the leaked emails showing an internal discussion at twitter that confirms these claims? Because the people who made false claims before have lost their right to be taken at their word.
Yes, if you don't have evidence, I can't believe you. There's been too much lying about this in the recent past. People have lost faith in the media, and the blame for that rests squarely on the media.“If you can’t bring leaked emails from X, it means we can’t believe they have a bot problem”
facepalm
The bot problem on Twitter is abundantly clear to anyone playing attention while they navigate the site. It's horrendous.Yes, if you don't have evidence, I can't believe you. There's been too much lying about this in the recent past. People have lost faith in the media, and the blame for that rests squarely on the media.
If you don't have proof, the next best thing would be a difference. What has changed for the source of your info? Can you point to the situations in 2013 and 2018 that you dismiss above, and show me tweets being made by someone who was skeptical of those situations as they unfolded, due to a lack of proof. Tweets critical of the false reporting about bots back then, which would give them a proven track record, and then tweets from the same person or group claiming that this is the real thing.
You can't keep crying wolf, and then expect people to keep believing you. However if you have a record of discernment and express the feeling that this time is different, that's at least something.