Mr Pockets said:Is the stress test just something like a 3Dmark benchmark? Or does it just keep track of performance while going all out in the game as you play it?
If it is just a test, it's too bad they don't make it public so people without CS can test their systems
Wario64 said:Whoa, reloading animation is affected by where you are in the map? That's pretty damn awesome
Stryder said:Ferrio : Do you have an ATI voucher? or Counter-Strike: Condition Zero?
Sweeeet! I'll have that, except a AMD64 3000+ instead, so I'm set. =)ZombieSupaStar said:
XP 3000 (400fsb)
Gig of DDR 3200 in dual channel
Nforce 2 mobo/chipset
Raedeon 9800 Pro 128
Windows XP Pro SP1
direct X 9.0b
Catalyst 4.8 drivers
HL2 > Doom3/far cry performance
JUST BRING IT! /rock
Same rig as me except i've got a gig of ddr pc2100 will it make much of a difference? I've also got a 256 meg 9800 Pro.amd 2000xp 512mb ddr333 9800pro
crawlingpeter said:i got ~86 on this:
2100+ OC'd to 2400+
1 gig 2700
9800 pro
by the way, cs:s is very beautiful and immersive.
Drexon said:I keep getting a lot of artifacts.. small white dots all over the place. What's wrong?
Anyways, I tested the stress test on my current comp...
AMD XP 1600+
256 SDRAM
Radeon 9800 Pro
~44 FPS.
I haven't changed it, so 1024 I guess. I found out that my chassis temp was pretty high, haven't had a decent gfx card in a while, so that's probably the cause.shibbs said:What resolution are you running it at?
Lukas said:those graphics look like complete ass
awesome. i was worried that the 6800 gt might have a little trouble with the super-high video settings.. i'm feeling better about my card, now. (i originally wanted an x800 xt or a 6800 ultra, but they just weren't available)Stryder said:My rig :
P4 2.8@3.7
1gig DDR400
6800 GT @ 420/1.10
My results :
This is at 1600x1200 8xAF 6xAA
Yes, I'm looking forward to HL2, this is one of the main reasons why I have this machine
Drexon said:I keep getting a lot of artifacts.. small white dots all over the place. What's wrong?
AA AF Avg FPS
---------------------------------------
6xAA 16xAF 26.41
6xAA 8xAF 26.42
6xAA 4xAF 26.94
6xAA 2xAF 28.16
6xAA TriF 29.30
6xAA BiF 29.09
4xAA 16xAF 28.29
4xAA 8xAF 28.72
4xAA 4xAF 29.18
4xAA 2xAF 30.53
4xAA TriF 31.62
4xAA BiF 31.93
2xAA 16xAF 29.86
2xAA 8xAF 30.51
2xAA 4xAF 31.13
2xAA 2xAF 32.62
2xAA TriF 34.40
2xAA BiF 34.30
0xAA 16xAF 47.69
0xAA 8xAF 48.67
0xAA 4xAF 50.58
0xAA 2xAF 55.08
0xAA TriF 59.45
0xAA BiF 59.79
AA = Anti-Aliasing
AF = Anisotropic Filtering
TriF = Trilinear Filtering
BiF = Bilinear Filtering
zooL said:You sure the small white dots you mean aren't the dust-particles which fly through the air in the hallway in dust?
6xAA 16xAF 35.37
6xAA 8xAF 35.96
6xAA 4xAF 37.31
6xAA 2xAF 38.43
6xAA TriF 40.82
6xAA BiF 40.70
4xAA 16xAF 38.99
4xAA 8xAF 40.15
4xAA 4xAF 41.76
4xAA 2xAF 43.57
4xAA TriF 46.32
4xAA BiF 46.96
2xAA 16xAF 42.99
2xAA 8xAF 43.20
2xAA 4xAF 45.21
2xAA 2xAF 48.05
2xAA TriF 52.07
2xAA BiF 51.55
0xAA 16xAF 50.50
0xAA 8xAF 51.14
0xAA 4xAF 54.17
0xAA 2xAF 56.97
0xAA TriF 62.74
0xAA BiF 61.18
AA = Anti-Aliasing
AF = Anisotropic Filtering
TriF = Trilinear Filtering
BiF = Bilinear Filtering
Freeburn said:Hmm, heres my benchmarking run results, something not quite right about either your results, or my results IJoel, you should be creaming me with that CPU, also I show the same similarity between Bilinear & Trilinear results, leading me to believe one or the other isn't implemented.
Freeburn said:My PC Specifications:
AMD Athlon XP 2500+ @ 1.8 Ghz / 1GB DDR PC-2700 / ATI 9600XT "Fireblade" / Catalyst