They have no choice but to try and fix it to turn it into a sustainable source of income. They have the MP add on to consider supporting too.
Console sales will dry up fast in the next year or so if they can't make improvements and the bad word of mouth continues to spread.
If it's true that they made all their expenses back already then there shouldn't be any more pressure.
Blade Runner meets Grand Theft Auto in this sprawling hellscape of a role-playing game, which is extraordinarily immersive but let down by misogyny and xenophobia
Do you know Quarter to Three? Its a fucking joke for years.Damn, this 40 review dropped the score down. Weird to think about it since they gave Far Cry 5 a 100 too.
Well, kinda expected when you see all the hate on the game going all over the internet, Reviewers will drop down the score to satisfy the angry crowd. Just like 100 score is to satisfy the fan crowd. I still think 40/100 is too low for this game, especially if you are giving a game like Far Cry 5 a 100/100. Weird standards but i guess its different opinions and we accept them.
Another point we disagree.
Cyberpunk departs a lot from RPG.... in fact it is more a action-adventure story just like Horizon.
It probably was a RPG in the past but CDPR changed the direction.
BTW I don't consider AC, Cyberpunk, Horizon, etc... RPG... you need to take that in mind about my opinion.
Nice catch and yes, the issue is not the game being bad. But they sold it as the Witcher Evolved in a futuristic setting and it's not that. It's a nice shooter with a progression system and some loot.
Cyberpunk 2077 review – could it ever live up to the hype?
Blade Runner meets Grand Theft Auto in this sprawling hellscape of a role-playing game, which is extraordinarily immersive but let down by misogyny and xenophobiawww.theguardian.com
discuss
Damn, this 40 review dropped the score down. Weird to think about it since they gave Far Cry 5 a 100 too.
Well, kinda expected when you see all the hate on the game going all over the internet, Reviewers will drop down the score to satisfy the angry crowd. Just like 100 score is to satisfy the fan crowd. I still think 40/100 is too low for this game, especially if you are giving a game like Far Cry 5 a 100/100. Weird standards but i guess its different opinions and we accept them.
oofDown to 87 on MC
CDPR was able to work on Cyberpunk 2077 for so many years because Witcher 3 kept making them money, year after year. It's going to be a different story if Cyberpunk 2077 sales crash and don't recover enough to fund their future projects in 2021 and beyond (free RT upgrade for current Witcher 3 owners, Cyberpunk 2077 next gen upgrades for PS/Xbox, Cyberpunk DLC + online modes, Witcher 4).
MC should have banned him years ago ( GameCritics too) , the guy is a click bait, must know as tom clickquarter to three is famous for giving games low scores just to get attention. tom chick is a joke
they gave tlou a 6
borderlands 3 a 2
ac origins a 4
civ VI a 4
the witness a 4
forza horizon 2 a 2
Lol having your bonus depend on mc scores only for a unproffesional to give stupid scores for attentionquarter to three is famous for giving games low scores just to get attention. tom chick is a joke
they gave tlou a 6
borderlands 3 a 2
ac origins a 4
civ VI a 4
the witness a 4
forza horizon 2 a 2
I called 88 after it opened at 93
The question is will it hit 87 or even lower...
They learn from Warcraft 3 Reforgedit is 87 already. but it will go lower. bashing the game is the new trend
"Almost no cars and crowds"? If you want to criticize the game, by all means go for it, but straight up lying just makes you look bad. The crowd density - on PC - is terrific. I'm constantly impressed at how many citizens are moving about - especially in the crowded markets and apartment building hallways.Where are all the people of the Night City? Almost no cars and crowds during the day. Even on PC. What a joke.
Quarter to Three bomba games just for the clicks all the time.Damn, this 40 review dropped the score down. Weird to think about it since they gave Far Cry 5 a 100 too.
Well, kinda expected when you see all the hate on the game going all over the internet, Reviewers will drop down the score to satisfy the angry crowd. Just like 100 score is to satisfy the fan crowd. I still think 40/100 is too low for this game, especially if you are giving a game like Far Cry 5 a 100/100. Weird standards but i guess its different opinions and we accept them.
Where are all the people of the Night City? Almost no cars and crowds during the day. Even on PC. What a joke.
Checked the pc version on Youtube. Does it count?Quarter to Three bomba games just for the clicks all the time.
Giving the PC version that score is a joke in itself, they really are the pits.
I'm not sure you're playing the game on PC with crowds turned up then....are you?
It is a Night City after all.Where are all the people of the Night City? Almost no cars and crowds during the day. Even on PC. What a joke.
Where are all the people of the Night City? Almost no cars and crowds during the day. Even on PC. What a joke.
Apart from the adults...It is a Night City after all.
People sleep at day.
You're trying to be cyberclever or cyberdick?do you have the slider on minimum?
Lol, outright LYING is a bad look dude.Where are all the people of the Night City? Almost no cars and crowds during the day. Even on PC. What a joke.
You're trying to be cyberclever or cyberdick?
Bashing Cyberpunk is so hot right now.
Checked the pc version on Youtube. Does it count?
You mean rightfully calling them out on their shit?
Please, your cdpr shill membership card is showing.
Now we're getting to a more deserved score. I think in the 70s is warranted, but we'll see.OC 82
none. i'm saying that may be you have the population setting on low. because on high there is definitely a lot of people and cars in the city
Bashing Cyberpunk is so hot right now.
Bashing Cyberpunk is so hot right now.
Immortals was crashing for me in similar rate (It also has super serious bug with autosave not always working, which exists also in Valhalla and Legion on XSX) and no one is crying that it's buggy mess. From what I read Cyberpunk crash if you are playing more than one hour on PS5 unless you restart it manually before, then it's working "fine".I’m probably the biggest supporter of CDPR after W3 but this is just a mess and beyond anything I have ever played on consoles and I’ve played really buggy games. 6th crash on PS5 just a moment and I’m less than 12 hours in. I’v never had a game with this many crashes. It ridiculous and they deserve every heat they get.
Is he the same person who complained about Witcher 3 "being too white"?
Not reallyGame was too ambitious for CDPR. Rockstar on the other hand is a fucking wizard for creating RDR2 and GTAV
I think that demo they showed in 2018 was probably the only real thing they had at that point, and most of the actual game was built in the last two years. Which isn't too crazy honestly, a lot of games are made like that. When people say a game was in development for X number of years, it doesn't mean that it was literally in full production for that many years. A lot of the early dev time goes towards engine work, developing the concept and lore, research, etc. And at some point they make a prototype to set out the blueprint for the game and then they have to figure out how to turn that slice into a full length game. Along the way a lot of compromises have to be made to the original vision in order to actually ship a game within the limitations of the project budget/scope and the hardware spec.Not really
Rockstar has some of the most talented people in the industry, no doubt.
But their secret sauce is: a lot of people, crunch and no rush
The "no rush" part is very important.
Its all assumptions right now, but I believe on that theory that Cyberpunk's story was rewritten in 2018 in order to put more of Keanu in it. Which would be insane, but in terms of marketing and etc., could make sense on why they decided to go for it.
If they started the production for real after The Witcher 3 launch, they had way too small of a time for a game this ambitious.
RDR 2 had 8 years, Cyberpunk had roughly half of that. Theres no amount of crunch in the world that could save the project.
ExactlyI think that demo they showed in 2018 was probably the only real thing they had at that point, and most of the actual game was built in the last two years. Which isn't too crazy honestly, a lot of games are made like that. When people say a game was in development for X number of years, it doesn't mean that it was literally in full production for that many years. A lot of the early dev time goes towards engine work, developing the concept and lore, research, etc. And at some point they make a prototype to set out the blueprint for the game and then they have to figure out how to turn that slice into a full length game. Along the way a lot of compromises have to be made to the original vision in order to actually ship a game within the limitations of the project budget/scope and the hardware spec.
I especially think this is the case for Cyberpunk because some of the things that were shown in that first demo promised a game that was significantly and fundamentally more complex than the final product turned out. So it makes sense that that stuff was just hopes and dreams that were never realised, rather than anything that was actually made and then changed or cut.
Not really, the slider was probably right down lol.Checked the pc version on Youtube. Does it count?