LordOcidax
Member
Here's the Cyberpunk 2077 Ultimate Edition creator's voice. Some new direct feed footages from the game.
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultimate Edition creator’s voice
- Thread starter LordOcidax
- Start date
LordOcidax
Member
Yes Switch 2 version, you can see the buttons layout.
Deerock71
Very Poor Hoice of Wor
You putting out troll bait or something? Careful, they'll try to talk you out of believing your own eyes.
corgiix3
Member
nah im being genuine it looks good. The switch 2 is so tiny i just have a hard time believing what its outputting.
PeteBull
Member
That thing could sell 10m+ copies on switch2 lifetime, cdpr arent stupid, they know nintendo players want this kind of mature game, since not that many such games are avaiable on nintendo consoles, ninny veterans gonna be like:
LordOcidax
Member
Bingo, this is something that people tend to forget, this is running on a device with a power budget of 10-40 watts and a PCB that's maybe weights less than 100 grams. That's why is funny to me when some people comments that the game doesn't runs like their 5 pounds 200 watts console…
Puscifer
Member
Hate em or love em, Nvidia's chips are pretty damn nuts.
LordOcidax
Member
Is fascinating what devs can achieve when they have access to the metal in a Nvidia chip, the Switch 2 is going to be a great showcase considering the form factor and the obvious limitations.
Last edited:
Shaki12345
Banned
Again they note VRR for portable only. This concerns me as it's probably not available on Docked.
It doesn't matter how it looks if it runs like ass.
It doesn't matter how it looks if it runs like ass.
Last edited:
Gambit2483
Member
Yet. Not available yet. Remember, PS5 did not ship with VRR support but later recieved it in a software update.
If it's at all technically possible I'm sure Nintendo and Nvidia will offer a similar software update as the system already clearly supports it.
Yeah, it's truly impressive considering it's running with a power consumption of 9-10W.
mayham2199
Member
Seriously can't wait to replay this game one day.
Mister Wolf
Member
They are smart getting this out as a launch title. I'm surprised we don't have better third party support for the launch. Elden Ring definitely should have been a launch title.
Last edited:
We have, streetfighter 6 for instance.
If you compare Sf6 even with the ps5, the game looks to have more detailed textures (i know it's an image upscaled), because of DLSS.
Do not mistake, in no way i'm saying the switch 2 is as powerful as the ps5, because it lacks that DOF garbage filter ps5 has and less shadow quality, and a bit lower resolution.
But i don't think anyone is saying otherwise. The console seems to be in line with ps4 pro where some parts thanks to nvidea having the best upscaler, it's even above on texture level (again, IQ).
Next would be Starwars. The impossible port by DF. Alex claims that the visuals are fine. It's the framerate that is an issue. It uses raytracing on switch 2 as well (as it can't without).
Last edited:
Buggy Loop
Member
I think dev kits came in hot.
Cyberpunk 2077 at launch is kind of a benchmark of what this little machine can do. Could perhaps even be improved in future as devs figure out mesh shaders.
DF timeline
1. DF claimed Switch 2 isn't stronger than Steam Deck.
2. MK World doesn't have AA in Switch 2 reveal trailer.
3. DLSS is absent for all games during Switch 2 direct. Claimed overhead costs are too big for Switch 2 to handle.
4. Cyberpunk 2077 and 3rd party titles are similar to PS4 in graphics and performance.
Hyet
Member
Well, I don't expect all devs to put in as much effort as CDPR.
I think the real test is going to be SW Outlaws and Borderlands 4. At least for setting expectations on where devs are with this.
It would hardly be suprising for a more recent build to have improved settings and performance.
BlownUpRich
Member
What wrong did DF do? They've got nothing to explain, they aren't gonna suck up to Switch 2, they will state the facts like how they always do, they said it looks like a PS4 graphics experience and reached down to 540p (DLSS won't help much here, I think it'll look extremely blurry & ugly on a 4K display) but at 30 or 40 FPS, and they noted that there are substantial FPS drops present in the DLC from their limited try at the game so far, down to the 10s FPS, actually base PS4 runs the game from 1080p to 900p natively, better to keep expectations in check as it's a game famously recognized for being exigent on hardware.
Last edited:
PS4 version of CP2077
- Dynamic 720 - 900P but most of the time at 720p
- Rarely holds 30 fps, dipping to below 20 fps on many occasions.
Yeah, they should admit their mistakes.
But as the video points out (beside there are no real framedrops, but it's a short video, so i don't want to use this as proof yet). the textures are better.
PS4 version clocks in with a maximum dynamic resolution of 900p,
Nothing but framedrops even on lower resolutions.
Much lower quality (low pc settings)
And so on.
Don't forget that Cyberpunk devs told that Switch 2 has way better performance. It's not in the same ballpark as ps4. It's in the same line as ps4 pro which mostly also runs at 1080p at 30fps (unstable)
They even bother to port the dlc to ps4 because of those specs. Developers who have their hands on , on the hardware do know what it possible.
There are a lot of things that are way better on switch 2 compared to a ps4. Even the dlss provide a better image.
What DF should have done is something like this:
But they didn't,. They just throwed in some words without explaining why the game actually look much better.
Even they could not tell those games were using dlss...
Here, another example with sf6 which on some level do things better as a ps5 (by far not all, so don't twist my words)
DLSS is going to be a gamechanger.
Everything points out that the switch 2 is not in the same ballpark as a ps4
- Specs, newer cpu, more ram, dlss, ray tracing and faster storage. The tech is more in line from current gen consoles in terms of tech, not talking about performance
- Cyberpunk aknowledge that the performance is way better. Even the dlc wasn't possible on a ps4. let alone how much framedrops it has. Ps4 pro is locked on 30fps, while switch 2 has a 40fps mode. We still need to compare the visuals here.
- Sf6 provide mode details as a ps5. Can show proof of that. But just google it. That doesn't mean it has better, shadows, geometry, filters
- Starwars is impossible to run on prev-gen. The visuals look good (DF Alex confirms this), it's the framerate that is an issue in the latest clip. But it's still in development.
Again, they have some explanation todo. It's no ps4, not even close.
Last edited:
Boy bawang
Member
They are probably ironing performance as we speak, and probably will for the upcoming few months. I just hope that the game remains above 30fps on release. It already looks great, but I wouldn't be surprised if like Witcher 3 on Switch, they significantly improve performance and visuals later.
Mister Wolf
Member
The Switch 2 version is clearly ahead of the PS4 version in IQ and performance.
Switch 2 version is so smooth
LordOcidax
Member
NopThe Switch 2 version is clearly ahead of the PS4 version in IQ and performance.
Switch 2 version is so smooth
GigaBowser
The bear of bad news
switch 2 versions will still have lunch porblems like other consoles buuuuuut improvements when they are done patches gets better every day i am known for my predictions bookmarked
GigaBowser
The bear of bad news
Nop
Baemono
Member
You don't know what DLSS is, don't you ?
Kataploom
Gold Member
Yes but this is way better than expected, it looks like 1440p games from my PC, not kidding, I just can't believe it's that good, I'll wait for final reviews because it might actually be 1440p. If it's actually 1080p then fuck me, even my optimistic expectations will be exceeded and ppl here know I'm more in the optimistic side already.
I mean, if games really look that clean at 1080p I will just prefer all are 1080p and push better shaders and frame rate, and will stop caring about Monolith Soft pushing GPU at the expense of IQ as they did in Switch 1.
I'll wait for reviews when the system comes out, and also plan to get SF6 on Switch so can make my own opinion.
Last edited:
LordOcidax
Member
Lol, not at all, saying that the Switch 2 version docked looks on par with the base Ps4 version just to claim that their predictions where's right just makes DF to look like clowns.
Last edited:
Kataploom
Gold Member
Check the video I posted, it's so good that I think that someone is lying here: DF in their estimations or Capcom by presenting a misleading trailer. That or DLSS on Switch 2 is miraculous somehow.
Last edited:
ReBurn
Gold Member
Oh I see.
Buggy Loop
Member
Ah, already beaten by gigabowser for the clown rich 
Last edited:
ReasonBeing
Member
I just looked up some gameplay of patch 1.6 on the PS4, and this gif does not look representative of what I saw at all. Not only did it look sharper than your images, but the stuttering was absent from the driving sections. Do you know if the the images and video you posted were sourced from an earlier version, or are these issues still present in certain areas of the game?The Switch 2 version is clearly ahead of the PS4 version in IQ and performance.
Switch 2 version is so smooth
Last edited:
GigaBowser
The bear of bad news
yamaci17
Member
could be dlss 4
1080p dlss 4 performance (540p) looks much sharper than 1440p native TSR
even 1440p native dlss 3 cannot keep the motion as clear as 1080p dlss 4 performance
just a guess of course
Last edited:
EverydayBeast
ChatGPT 0.001
Played cyberpunk years ago and I'm not buying it again
Last edited:
ReasonBeing
Member
Just type in Cyberpunk PS4 Patch 1.6 on YouTube and see for yourself.posts them
Last edited:
Deerock71
Very Poor Hoice of Wor
CDPR had to make the PS4 version better. Thanks for being the Switch 2's alpha testers!
GigaBowser
The bear of bad news
ahahaha looks like crud
ReasonBeing
Member
Regardless of your subjective opinion, it looks better than what was posted as a representation of the game on PS4. I'm not picking sides here as Cyberpunk looks good on a Switch 2. This also means it's unnecessary to have a comparison that misrepresents the current state of a game on a 12 year old console.
What does that even mean? I didn't play the game on PS4, I watched a youtube video. I was working with an X1X when it launched.CDPR had to make the PS4 version better. Thanks for being the Switch 2's alpha testers!
Last edited:
Deerock71
Very Poor Hoice of Wor
It was a ripping hot mess on the PS4. Several revisions later, it's playable and (hopefully) fun! It couldn't have been done without the Sony Ponies!