CornBurrito
Member
all lynch decisions should be settled via mario party minigame going forward imo
I'd be down with that. But it needs to be Mario Party 3. And none of that bullshit 2v2 crap or 1v3 crap.
all lynch decisions should be settled via mario party minigame going forward imo
all lynch decisions should be settled via mario party minigame going forward imo
I'd be down with that. But it needs to be Mario Party 3. And none of that bullshit 2v2 crap or 1v3 crap.
One more day, folks. One more day until I start kicking your asses so hard they'll feel it in the Phantom Zone.
"The preparations are complete. The observants sit in their chamber, waiting for the test to begin. And that time has come. I wish you all well. Remember, the fate of 2 universes are at stake.
No pressure."
I'm sure you boys will have fun
Danny, will you relax.Wait, are you role-claiming to be Damon Gray? That's his catch phrase.
Oh yeah? You and what toaster?why are you guys fakecrumbing?
You have a battle-cry. Hilarious.Let's have a truly random D1. Let's come up with some kinda foolproof algorithm that will decide for us a completely random individual to lynch.
Okay, I have a proton pack, some holy water, an ectoplasm sensor, and a Dummy's Guide to Exorcism: Fifth Edition on hand. I think I am ready.
It is kinda weird not having someone make some huge pre-prepared post at the start though. It is leaving me a little uncertain on how to start. I haven't had the chance to play with most of you guys yet.
I am for a Day 1 lynch. Going for a No Lynch vote means putting your faith in the existence of useful investigator roles. Even if those roles are present, that doesn't mean they will return useful info after just one night. Better to get votes on the table that can be examined for information later.Oh right, we actually have one new person here.
Hi melonrabbit!
I haven't seen the debate lately, but there used to be a lynch/no-lynch debate. Pretty much every D1 ends with a lynch because it gets people talking and puts some pressure on them.
The goal of the game is to catch scum so... do that. It's also really hard to read other people if they're not engaged in the game. Unless you're getting close to being lynched or the info could be very valuable it's generally a bad idea to role claim. People being suspicious of you is part of the game.
I'm still figuring that out. In the Matrix 9 game, I made some major misplays, so I am still reevaluating my approach to Mafia. For now, my mantra will be "don't rule out anyone as Mafia".---------------------------------
SkyOdin, what's your plan for the game?
Wow, we already have the return of Karkador's Bat-computer? I didn't take you to be a copy-cat, Darryl. Your execution is lacking though. You should have implied it to be part of your role. Calling it an RNG list renders it pretty meaningless. Especially since I can't trust that this list is actually RNG at all.Ok, so there's 22 players.
That means there's likely to be 4-5 mafia players.
[m] SkyOdin
[m] gryvan
[m] Rats Off to Ya
[m] Royal_Flush
[m] Matt Attack
So in this randomly generated list, there's likely to be one scum. Probably caught a PR, too. Which one of you is it???
Wow, we already have the return of Karkador's Bat-computer? I didn't take you to be a copy-cat, Darryl. Your execution is lacking though. You should have implied it to be part of your role. Calling it an RNG list renders it pretty meaningless. Especially since I can't trust that this list is actually RNG at all.
To be frank, this looks like scum trying to divert attention away from scum.
Great catch, I hadn't thought about that. The anonymous vote seems like it could be especially dangerous in the early game where I assume town will be more split and a lot of mafia members are still alive.Adding onto the "don't role claim" point. This is equally true if you're just vanilla town. Especially in this game where we know that there's a role which causes Bad Things (TM) to occur if they die.
Great catch, I hadn't thought about that. The anonymous vote seems like it could be especially dangerous in the early game where I assume town will be more split and a lot of mafia members are still alive.
Interesting theory. Would you expect scum to give a list of any sort with no scum on it?
And do you actually think that Darryl intends for that list to be taken seriously?
All told, I think that narrowing down our list of suspects and focusing on a small, arbitrary group of people is anti-town. I suspect that Daryl is just trying to put pressure on people to get them to talk, but at the same time, I think the list could easily be a mafia ploy to just confuse and distract people.
Now, in the Batman game, I think that the villain team was able to take advantage of both Karkador's Batcomputer list and an actual investigative list (where someone was able to check whether or not there was scum among the people who voted for a particular player on one day) to distract and confuse town. A true random list of five players that may or may not have scum in it is less than worthless. If we lynched everyone on the list, odds are that we would lynch four townies to net one mafia. That isn't a good trade-off, particularly when there is one player we don't want to lynch in the player pool.
I have trouble imagining scum making a play like this so early on in the game. I'd say that we should keep it in mind, but not place too much stock in it. At least not until we have more reason to do so.
In Batman scum (I think, never read their chat post game) tried to throw doubt at the list by NKing one of the targets because there were two scum in it. It was sort of helpful to town, WIFOM as hell, but I found it likely that there were indeed scum on it and focused on the list. Had we kept lynching them we'd have gotten one or maybe two scum.
The game would probably have been very different (even if still a scum victory) had there been no tie.
I'm having trouble seeing it as an alignment indicative play at all. I don't see posting a list of names in that manner as a bold gambit which scum wouldn't want to do to avoid standing out though.
It's an (allegedly) RNG'd list, and it doesn't read like something which was intended to be taken overly seriously. Regardless of it being a town or scum play, I don't see there being much meaning behind those names.
Well, true. I openly admit that I highly enjoyed Karkador's Batcomputer gambit, even though it led Karkador to falsely suspect me and directly contributed to me being killed on Night 1. However, I think he constructed it in a very clever manner by 1) implying that it was the benefit of a role he had, and 2) creating the alternate name to give scum a target to focus on to deflect from the scum on the main list. Karkador was able to use these parts of his gambit to make the Mafia sweat and control their actions somewhat. However, I don't really see what Darryl is currently trying to accomplish.
Wow, we already have the return of Karkador's Bat-computer? (sarcasm)I didn't take you to be a copy-cat, Darryl (insult). Your execution is lacking though. (insult) You should have implied it to be part of your role. (why ?) Calling it an RNG list renders it pretty meaningless. (ok it was supposed to be a meaningless list) Especially since I can't trust that this list is actually RNG at all. (WTF?)
I'm 3 hours late and we haven't descended into total chaos yet. I am disappointed.
what a load of words
Hey, this is Mafia. Presuming that there are people here who are lying to me feels like the safe bet.
Adding onto the "don't role claim" point. This is equally true if you're just vanilla town. Especially in this game where we know that there's a role which causes Bad Things (TM) to occur if they die.