Christina Mackenzie
Member
Damn stealth edit.
Damn stealth edit.
Everyone else seemed to ignore you on this so I'll ask: why did you bring this up?
Hmm ?
Don't worry about it.
Any other thoughts on players ?
Burb, Stan, muffin or even me ?
You're intentionally inflating your post count, I wish I could get away with something like that. I could see you lasting longer that most players in this game but that unfortunately makes you susceptible to something else entirely.
rac isn't here to play nice with town.
I was expecting to see more activity from CornBurrito and Fireblend.
That's a bold play cotton, let's see if it works out for them. Why don't you think Saw couldn't be scum? I haven't seen anything to sway me either way day 1 but you seem pretty confident.Even worse after he turned up. Just standard sholck, and a bandwagon vote for FEP. Coupled with the Burb stuff, it just makes me more suspicious. I will say that if he is scum, it's not a good play right now, but besides going after an inactive, which he more or less is, I don't see a better path. So no, I won't be moving my vote by their actions, I will switch if someone else gives me a reason to.
Also, It's late, so I'm going to bed. I might not get to my remaining reads tomorrow, and I have class, so I might not post before deadline at all, not sure, I'll try though. Anywho, the summery is mainly, everyone needs to post more, except for nin, monkey, and Sawneeks, who are good people, except Sawneeks, who we should kill, because she scares me, alot, but she probably isn't scum.
Does this mean you're interested in a Fire lynch? Seems like you pre-empt it by saying he might be town but then 'I want to make sure so wouldn't mind the lynch'. Seems like an odd stance.Lord of Castamere makes a good case against FireBlend but this being Day 1, I wouldn't be surprised if he flipped town. Might be worth a punt?
Does this mean you're interested in a Fire lynch? Seems like you pre-empt it by saying he might be town but then 'I want to make sure so wouldn't mind the lynch'. Seems like an odd stance.
A question though. How was Fireblend contributing exactly at this point? You didn't include him on your kill list, but at that point he had posted nothing. Still hasn't really fill-fulled his promises. I had, at least, one bigger post discussing my thoughts, at that point, but not Fireblend.
I have a tough time reading Sawneeks or Oreo as scum right now. Hey_Monkey too. They're all contributing to the conservation in a way that I feel productive. If we're going to lynch, my choice would be someone like Corn or nin. People assume that scum wants to lay low, but sometimes a good offense is the best defense. Posting a lot without moving the conversation forward is an easy way to generate presence. That's the vibe I get from nin. Corn's post just give me weird vibes. I admit that there is little to argue with there. Sometimes you just have gut feelings. I'll do some more thinking about LoC, Stanley, kits, and Muffin before I place a vote.
Okay, I didn't understand the wording then. So basically you think there might be an argument against Fire, but not to the extent you'd lynch him today? Got it.Was referring to Lord of Castamere's reasons for suspicion when Burbeting gave Fireblend a pass for not being "dead weight" despite being absent most of the day phase.
It's an interesting idea but the pessimist in me says I wouldn't be surprised if Fireblend flipped town since what are the chances of hitting scum on Day 1? Not in any games I've participated at least.
Not going to lynch Fireblend cause I want to see if he's town but if he does flip mafia and that would implicate Burbeting and I'm aware it's a longshot.
I am guilty of those charges.
Yet I want to ask you this though.
How is a player who only made posts about observations pushing the conversation forward ?
They're not?
Is this shade?
2. Fireblend
I understand that life happens, I really do, but as a 3 time scum, one thing I'm intimately familiar with making promises that I have no intention of keeping.
I wasn't expecting to vote for these two when I started, but it is what it is, I'm not getting good vibes from either, after my dig, and today might be our only big info lynch, so I think we should reap the soul of Fireblend. If my connection is true, and it might not be, we could get two scum my one lynch. In any case, my vote is decided.
Why Fireblend over Burb? Burb is at least contributing, if we have to kill someone Id rather be wrong with someone that isnt as useful, honestly.
They can counter this, of course, but I don't really know how you can without prior meta usage, which is lame duck excuse imo.
I think there's a fair chance that Fireblend, Burb, and one of the people on his list is scum.
VOTE: Fireblend
Even worse after he turned up. Just standard sholck, and a bandwagon vote for FEP. Coupled with the Burb stuff, it just makes me more suspicious. I will say that if he is scum, it's not a good play right now, but besides going after an inactive, which he more or less is, I don't see a better path. So no, I won't be moving my vote by their actions, I will switch if someone else gives me a reason to.
Right now I don't think Verelios has potential of turning into dead weight later, if nothing else, he is usually around even as a scum.
unvote
When I say dead weight, I mean something scum can use to divert the attention from themselves by there being players in late game for town to do lazy mislynches on. For example, the lynch on StarSketch in love boat 2 was kinda like that - a vote on a pair of players who were lynched on weak arguments, but were done so anyway because it was easy for the scum to divert the lynch there. Dead weight also fits one of the scum profiles of a player who is scared of posting much, but is just mostly there.
So using a patented bear-bean-machine, I have a list of players I wouldn't mind lynching today:
5. [m] isaacnukem
7. [f] kitsunelaine
8. [m] Trigger
9. [m] oreomunsta
17. [m] rac
I was kind of considering adding Fireblend and nin there, but Fire does usually post semi-actively, although he has bad case of blending in the games I've played with him. Nin isn't dead weight, but the scum does usually let him live for long time just to let him do his thing and confuse/muddle the waters in the game in general. But the five chosen are the ones that I wouldn't mind seeing gone.
rethinking Nin - where is the line between too obnoxious to be scum and overposting with absolutely nothing to clog the airwaves and block real discussion?
2. "Right..." isn't fud and snark. It was me being embarrassed that I missed that No Lynch counts as a vote.
So what's "real" discussion?
I'm sorry I haven't been in the game much. Also if I'm still alive by the end of the day I won't be around until Saturday evening. Good night and good luck.
Eh, I guess I can't deny that I always come off a little scummy for not taking harder stances or posting more. However I don't see what you guys gain in lynching me. This is pretty low hanging fruit. It didn't help town any in Love Boat. It won't help us now. Scum hides in plain sight, not at the bottom of the posting list.
Hmm... Hypnotist is the greatest counter to the Arsonist.
Arsonist probably cant risk being too active. Lest they draw that attention.
I bet our Arsonist has made few posts today, unless they are smart and staying middle of the pack.
I'd think it's the latter. If I were the Arsonist, I'd take the danger of getting hit by the hypnotist over being to inactive and becoming the victim of a sudden lynch for coasting.
That's a bold play cotton, let's see if it works out for them. Why don't you think Saw couldn't be scum? I haven't seen anything to sway me either way day 1 but you seem pretty confident.
It's an interesting idea but the pessimist in me says I wouldn't be surprised if Fireblend flipped town since what are the chances of hitting scum on Day 1? Not in any games I've participated at least. The longer she stays alive though...
Not going to lynch Fireblend cause I want to see if he's town but if he does flip mafia and that would implicate Burbeting and I'm aware it's a longshot.