WASHINGTON South Florida has long been a laboratory for some of the nations roughest politics, with techniques like phantom candidates created by political rivals to siphon off votes from their opponents, or so-called boleteras hired to illegally fill out stacks of absentee ballots on behalf of elderly or disabled voters.
But there was never anything quite like the 2016 election campaign, when a handful of Democratic House candidates became targets of a Russian influence operation that made thousands of pages of documents stolen by hackers from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in Washington available to Florida reporters and bloggers.
It was like I was standing out there naked, said Annette Taddeo, a Democrat who lost her primary race after secret campaign documents were made public. I just cant describe it any other way. Our entire internal strategy plan was made public, and suddenly all this material was out there and could be used against me.
The impact of the information released by the hackers on candidates like Ms. Taddeo in Florida and others in nearly a dozen House races around the country was largely lost in the focus on the hacking attacks against the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clintons presidential campaign. But this untold story underscores the effect the Russian operation had on the American electoral system.
This is not a traditional tit-for-tat on a partisan political campaign, where one side hits the other and then you respond, said Kelly Ward, executive director of the D.C.C.C. This is an attack by a foreign actor that had the intent to disrupt our election, and we were the victims of it.
Why the Russian government might care about these unglamorous House races is a source of bafflement for some of the lawmakers who were targeted. But if the goal of Russias president, Vladimir V. Putin, was to make American democracy a less attractive model to his own citizens and to Russias neighbors, then entangling congressional races in accusations of leaks and subterfuge was a step in the right direction.
The intrusions in House races in states including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Ohio, Illinois, New Mexico and North Carolina can be traced to tens of thousands of pages of documents taken from the D.C.C.C., which shares a Capitol Hill office building with the Democratic National Committee.
The document dumps effectiveness was due in part to a de facto alliance that formed between the Russian hackers and political bloggers and newspapers across the United States. The hackers, working under the made-up name of Guccifer 2.0, used social media tools to invite individual reporters to request specific caches of documents, handing them out the way political operatives distribute scoops. It was an arrangement that proved irresistible to many news outlets and amplified the consequences of the cyberattack.
Its time for new revelations now, the Guccifer 2.0 website proclaimed, as it began to pass out the D.C.C.C. documents, trying to entice reporters to look at them on their own. All of you may have heard about the D.C.C.C. hack. As you see I wasnt wasting my time! It was even easier than in the case of the D.N.C. breach.
Cybersecurity consultants believe the hacking of the D.C.C.C. took place around March or April of 2016 after a staffer clicked on a so-called phishing email. The D.C.C.C. shut down its computer system for a week from the moment it learned of the attack in June. But it was already too late to close the door. The consequences started to become clear in August when the hackers released the home addresses, cellphone numbers and personal email addresses of Democratic House members.
As you are aware, the D.C.C.C. and other Democratic Party entities have been the target of cybersecurity intrusions an electronic Watergate break-in, the House minority leader, Nancy Pelosi, wrote in an email the day after the personal information was released. The email continued, It has been widely reported that this cybersecurity incident is part of a Russian cyberattack which appears to be an attempt to interfere with our elections. We take this troubling situation very seriously and have notified the appropriate authorities, including the F.B.I. and Sergeant-at-Arms.
State troopers were sent to the homes of House Democrats across the United States, and they were urged to immediately change their cellphone numbers and personal email addresses, although this took place after many received a series of obscene calls, texts and emails.
Here's the money shot:
After the first political advertisement appeared using the hacked material, Mr. Luján wrote a letter to his Republican counterpart at the National Republican Congressional Committee urging him to not use this stolen material in the 2016 campaign.
The N.R.C.C.s use of documents stolen by the Russians plays right into the hands of one of the United States most dangerous adversaries, Mr. Lujáns Aug. 29 letter said. Put simply, if this action continues, the N.R.C.C. will be complicit in aiding the Russian government in its effort to influence American elections.
Ms. Pelosi sent a similar letter in early September to Mr. Ryan. Neither received a response. By October, the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC tied to Mr. Ryan, had used the stolen material in another advertisement, attacking Mr. Garcia during the general election in Florida.
AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan, said he did not control how the material was used in the ad, although she did not dispute that the material had been stolen as part of an act of Russian espionage. Speaker Ryan has said for months that foreign intervention in our elections is unacceptable, she said in a written statement.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/house-democrats-hacking-dccc.html?mwrsm=Facebook&_r=0
This was Watergate as carried out by the KGB. The worst part is we knew about it while it was happening and no one bothered to make it into a story. This story could have been written back in October, much like the other one, but no one bothered.
How is knowingly using files in a political campaign passed to you by a foreign government's espionage program not a form of treason?
We actually had a scandal worse than Watergate and no one bothered with it until after it was all said and done.