• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Democratic Primary Debate VI: Raid Time 2/11 9PM EST

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jay-Hova

Banned
He started pissing me off when he started playing the "not a real progressive" angle about Clinton. Both of them should want their base to move to the other candidate if they lose the nomination. Make a case for why you're a better candidate of course, but don't prime your supporters to sit home election night because "she's barely better than the republicans"
Hilary specifically said she was a progressive in one speech and then in the other said she was a moderate, he's running a campaign and has to do whatever it takes to win, in fact I wish he was harder on her because he's had chances to be harder but it won't happen.
Making that distinction is far from terrible imo.
Edit:I do have problems with him though
 

Ashodin

Member
If Bernie stops spouting his nonsense about a revolution, sure.

I meant I look forward to your very pointed comments in relation to what's being said at the debate.

In relation to the previous comment, it's most definitely a revolution. One that starts in the minds and hearts of the voters.
 
I meant I look forward to your very pointed comments in relation to what's being said at the debate.

In relation to the previous comment, it's most definitely a revolution. One that starts in the minds and hearts of the voters.

there's no revolution going on, dude
 

Iolo

Member
This is a legitimately valid point when Hillary has been responsible for the deaths of millions from Iraq to Libya.

As one of 77 senators to vote for Iraq, she is Senatorially responsible for 1/77th of the 175,000 documented Iraqi civilian deaths, or at most 2,300 dead.

Bernie was 1 of 10 senators who cosponsored a resolution asking "the United Nations Security Council to take such further action as may be necessary to protect civilians in Libya from attack, including the possible imposition of a no-fly zone over Libyan territory", which ultimately culminated in UN resolutions resulting in action to pressure Gaddafi to step down. Casualties ranged as high as 25,000, fully 2500 of which can thus logically be traced directly to Senator Sanders.

I ask you, who is the bigger monster?
 

zoozilla

Member
there's no revolution going on, dude

tumblr_inline_nszlq4Z2FF1qawtfi_500.jpg
 

HylianTom

Banned
People complained that 6 Dem debates weren't enough, so now there's 10. Which means after this one, there's 4 more.

Trivia!

There were more than 20 Dem primary debates in 1988 (but there were more candidates to sort through).

One SNL sketch that year opened with the moderator saying to the viewers, "Welcome to the, what.. 53rd(!?) Democratic debate."
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Should be a good debate.

I'm curious to see what happens now that the Sanders campaign needs to tune its message towards a wider constituency, given that the Democratic bases of New Hampshire and Iowa mirror his own in Vermont (we've seen a little bit of this this past week, and I'm underwhelmed). I'm curious to see if Hillary can come up with a coherent message for her campaign that she's otherwise lacked.

I think things are a lot harder for Sanders going forward than I've seen some expression on on GAF, but I also think he's running a (thus far) great campaign.
 

A Human Becoming

More than a Member
Having voted Tuesday and spent a lot of time since November volunteering for a campaign I'm not excited about this one in the least. Now the Republican debates on the other hand...
 

SecretDan

A mudslide of fun!
I meant I look forward to your very pointed comments in relation to what's being said at the debate.

In relation to the previous comment, it's most definitely a revolution. One that starts in the minds and hearts of the voters.

Good lord.
 

Dude Abides

Banned
I meant I look forward to your very pointed comments in relation to what's being said at the debate.

In relation to the previous comment, it's most definitely a revolution. One that starts in the minds and hearts of the voters.

Voting for someone isn't a revolution. It's like, the opposite.
 

Brinbe

Member
Gonna be fascinating to see what Hillary does now... Really hope she doesn't go too negative and fuck herself over. I guess that'll show how nervous they are about Bernie's chances at winning NV/SC and capturing the nom.
 

Krowley

Member
WE ARE GOING TO LEAD A POLITICAL REVOLUTION

*turn out down in Iowa and New Hampshire*

WE ARE GOING TO LEAD A POLITICAL REVOLUTION

Depends on how you look at it.

Obama turned out 104,815 voters to vote for him in the 08 NH primary.

Sanders turned out 151,578 to vote for him last week.

Plus Sanders had to compete with Trump for independent voters, and media attention .
 

Ashodin

Member
Gonna be fascinating to see what Hillary does now... Really hope she doesn't go too negative and fuck herself over. I guess that'll show how nervous they are about Bernie's chances at winning NV/SC and capturing the nom.

Could do her in like 2008. I think she's already concerned that Bernie came up out of nowhere.
 
Gonna be fascinating to see what Hillary does now... Really hope she doesn't go too negative and fuck herself over. I guess that'll show how nervous they are about Bernie's chances at winning NV/SC and capturing the nom.
Sooo... I'm curious. There's this narrative now that the Clinton campaign is in what is described as anywhere from a scramble to a panic.

Guys like (not picking on them but the names just stick in my mind) Amir0x and B-Dubs on GAF are constantly pointing out that anyone who understands politics knows that Sanders has no chance, and if you think he does you're ignorant.

So what's the deal? Is the Clinton campaign actually worried or is that just a myth? If they are, are they uneducated on US politics? Have Sanders' chances in the southeast changed at all?
 
Sooo... I'm curious. There's this narrative now that the Clinton campaign is in what is described as anywhere from a scramble to a panic.

Guys like (not picking on them but the names just stick in my mind) Amir0x and B-Dubs on GAF are constantly pointing out that anyone who understands politics knows that Sanders has no chance, and if you think he does you're ignorant.

So what's the deal? Is the Clinton campaign actually worried or is that just a myth? If they are, are they uneducated on US politics? Have Sanders' chances in the southeast changed at all?

We'll know more by the end of the weekend. It's too early to tell if he's making significant strides at this moment.
 
Sooo... I'm curious. There's this narrative now that the Clinton campaign is in what is described as anywhere from a scramble to a panic.

Guys like (not picking on them but the names just stick in my mind) Amir0x and B-Dubs on GAF are constantly pointing out that anyone who understands politics knows that Sanders has no chance, and if you think he does you're ignorant.

So what's the deal? Is the Clinton campaign actually worried or is that just a myth? If they are, are they uneducated on US politics? Have Sanders' chances in the southeast changed at all?
You're not going to get a usable answer, since everyone's too entrenched. You'd actually be better off asking RepublicanGAF or EuroGAF.
 
Sooo... I'm curious. There's this narrative now that the Clinton campaign is in what is described as anywhere from a scramble to a panic.

Guys like (not picking on them but the names just stick in my mind) Amir0x and B-Dubs on GAF are constantly pointing out that anyone who understands politics knows that Sanders has no chance, and if you think he does you're ignorant.

So what's the deal? Is the Clinton campaign actually worried or is that just a myth? If they are, are they uneducated on US politics? Have Sanders' chances in the southeast changed at all?

Bernie is a self described socialist. Americans hate the word. The superdelegates are set in stone and there has been no movement towards Bernie in SC. Its a really bleak scenario for his campaign and the only reason he keeps going is because of dellusions of starting a political revolution.
 

Tesseract

Banned
Bernie is a self described socialist. Americans hate the word. The superdelegates are set in stone and there has been no movement towards Bernie in SC. Its a really bleak scenario for his campaign and the only reason he keeps going is because of dellusions of starting a political revolution.

are we going in circles, or what
 

zoozilla

Member
Sooo... I'm curious. There's this narrative now that the Clinton campaign is in what is described as anywhere from a scramble to a panic.

Guys like (not picking on them but the names just stick in my mind) Amir0x and B-Dubs on GAF are constantly pointing out that anyone who understands politics knows that Sanders has no chance, and if you think he does you're ignorant.

So what's the deal? Is the Clinton campaign actually worried or is that just a myth? If they are, are they uneducated on US politics? Have Sanders' chances in the southeast changed at all?

Conventional wisdom says that there's no chance that Sanders wins.

The problem is that this election season has thrown conventional wisdom out the window, especially on the Republican side. It's still unlikely that Bernie will win, but this year there's a sense that anything can happen.

Which makes for exciting times indeed.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
You're not going to get a usable answer, since everyone's too entrenched. You'd actually be better off asking RepublicanGAF or EuroGAF.

From my EuroGAF perspective I can tell you the media here is finally treating Bernie as a legitimate candidate as opposed to a curiosity. Other than that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom