I wouldn't have blamed them if they'd just let Denis talk to himself for an hour.Pristine_Condition said:The rest of the guys aren't even there. Nice work fellas. Way to participate.
Would've amounted to the same bullshit either way.
I wouldn't have blamed them if they'd just let Denis talk to himself for an hour.Pristine_Condition said:The rest of the guys aren't even there. Nice work fellas. Way to participate.
Pristine_Condition said:Just finished listening.
Garnett gets a few props from me.
Shane comes off as a fucking weak yes-man. I've totally lost respect for him as a voice for gaming culture.
The rest of the guys aren't even there. Nice work fellas. Way to participate.
Denis is just the same old Denis he was in March 2007, when he was pulling the same old "I'm so much better than you" stuff on NeoGAF. I said everything I wanted to say to him, directly to him, way back then, so I'll leave it at that.
If anybody cares:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5775057&postcount=158
ggnoobIGN said:LOL wat? Going into release, AC impressed everyone with it's awesome trailers and won tons of e3 awards. It did receive backlash(including from myself), but this is not even close to being the same thing.
keanerie said:Denis, just stop being butthurt about what "we" (and GAF is not a hivemind) think about you, and start focusing your energy on attracting the consumers who could give a rat's ass about who you are and what you think, the people that don't post on GAF, the ones who will see and judge your game by its marketing in mainstream outlets - they'll make or break your game. Not us.
mikekennyb said:The guy really just seems hyper sensitive and childish. Those who didn't see it from the EGM preview with Mark McDonald might have seen it with the lawsuit against Epic. And if not there then hopefully the past couple weeks on GAF has been educational.
But his point is bad for the industry, all of his efforts to 'change the industry' simply remove all forms of criticism or possible negativity (including fan opinion) until the actual reviews hit, and by then the pre-orders are already sent out.I can see his point personally.
But it's the same everywhere, the ones making the most noise are the ones that are heard. Unfortunately, those same people are usually the dumbest of them all as well.
I hope most people think for themselves when getting a game, and don't let themselves be affected by other people's opinions no matter how loudly they are shouted.
Personally, *gasp*, I listen to the people who make calm, arguments with little emotion attached to it. The people who are showing signs of WANTING Dyack to fail, those people I couldn't care less about.
And Dyack is right, this forum has allowed too much slandering towards Dyack that they don't seem to have allowed against other people.
Come on people, I urge you to think for yourself. Simple example; if you like bunnies then fucking own up to it. So what if it's not what the group thinks is cool or acceptable, you are who you are and you like what you like.
Most of you will hopefully learn this as you go through experiences in life. Fitting in with the crowd (negative, or positive) is equally dumb. Just be who you are and what you like.
It doesn't make you less "wrong" (unless you decide to take action with your opinions and take away other people's freedom to be who they are).
Vinci said:Better yet: He should simply keep his damn mouth shut, make his game, and let it sink or swim on its own merits rather than espousing his views like he's a damn prophet of the industry.
VanMardigan said:To be fair, his argument seems to be that his game may not be allowed to sink or swim on its own merits because of the current gaming culture climate. He just adds a bunch of crap around that argument and sort of pre-supposes that his game will be good and those who disagree are haters or misinformed.
mildewproduction said:Dennis Dyack PR GENIUS!!!
6 weeks before your game, which you have spent 10 YEARS making, comes out start shitting on your customers.
What I don't get is that it seems Dyack understands teh Internetz. He posts on IGN forums, and it's obvious he reads GAF. You would think a business man who has his hand on the pulse of this community would be showing a clip of Baldar fighting the pedobear, or some secret orange and grey armor called NeoG.
Instead he runs his mouth and creates a 50 page bash thread on him, his company, and his game. I'm sure Microsoft PR is shitting themselves right now.
NeoGAF is easy to manipulate. You throw them a bone they worship you. You bash them they make animated .gifs of you.
I'm still looking forward to Too Human, as I've loved every Silicon Knights game I've played, but Dennis WTF are you doing? Why spend time in the forums, if this is the end result?
If he gets Ubisoft on board he might succeed, on the other hand the mods could just clean-up the entire board and thus delete any case they might have against GAF.Pristine_Condition said:Reading over the quote I replied to way back in 3/2007 (see my post above) I wonder if Dyack has honestly been thinking about a plan for legal action against GAF for some time. When you connect his vague, ominous (threat?) back then -- "In time these comments will be bearers of fruit. Unfortunately for many here, they are going to be very bitter" -- with his recent statements, I wonder.
Does he honestly think he someone could sue GAF, or does he just hope that this campaign of his where the thought of legal action is put forth will have a chilling effect on his critics that he desires to be silenced?
Either way, it seems he has an agenda. Sorry to say that from listening again to the podcast, Shane from 1Up seems to be all in favor of it.
[Nintex] said:If he gets Ubisoft on board he might succeed, on the other hand the mods could just clean-up the entire board and thus delete any case they might have against GAF.
eznark said:http://blogs.ign.com/Bozon-IGN/2008/07/07/95053/
Bozon has impressions ("20 hours in"?!?) but I'm blocked at work. Anyone provide the gist?
Mr. E. Yis said:It makes it much easier for him to track where we live, like he did to Kittowny.
Mr. E. Yis said:What he really wants us all to do is to stop trolling anonymously, and start trolling with our real names (like he does) and be attention whores like him. It makes it much easier for him to track where we live, like he did to Kittowny.
Rummy Bunnz said:Man, there isn't even anything in that last 100 issues as embarrassing as that Too Human opening. Not even the 30 issues of bible analysis with Woody Allen. Or "men come from semen, women come from eggs" (though that may be post-300). I'll take all that raging against the female void over Nietzsche quotes and bear warriors any day.
Or maybe not. The bear warriors may be funnier than anything post-186.
He said that in one of the interviews I think. He said that he looked up who Kittonwy was and where he lived etc.Vinci said:He did what??!
[Nintex] said:He said that in one of the interviews I think. He said that he looked up who Kittonwy was and where he lived etc.
Vinci said:And the point of him doing this and mentioning it in an interview was to do what, prove how creepy a fuck of a human being he is? Seriously, what the hell?
Now I want his game to fail.
boy, if life was only like this.njp142 said:If someone could make a gif redoing the scene from Annie Hall when that guy in the movie line is talking about Marshall Mcluhan and Mcluhan comes in and says "you know nothing of my work", replacing the guy with Dyack, Woody Allen with Garnett, and Mcluhan with Peter Drucker it would be perfect.
Vinci said:He did what??!
Vinci said:Better yet: He should simply keep his damn mouth shut, make his game, and let it sink or swim on its own merits rather than espousing his views like he's a damn prophet of the industry.
Slurpy said:48 pages? What the fuck is wrong with you people?
Nolan. said:I'm not sure if he should shut up completely, just know when to and what to talk about. He gets thrown a question about the theme of his game and he starts talking about dark sides of technology. He's asked about mechanics and he starts talking about professors and technology again.
Vinci said:WE HATES HIM
Honestly, he should shut up completely. He can't seem to talk for more than two minutes without spewing bullshit that no one cares about or attacking this or that. In short, he needs to act like most of the other respectable developers out there who keep their mouths shut.
Crayon said:lol@ "he makes good points" posts.
Nolan. said:If that was to me I was more referring to his one console future musings than his ranting on here.
I've seen better arguments for a one console future on NeoGAF than anything Dyack has said. Dyack just manages to get himself a soapbox to lecture from while people on here actually defend their arguments and don't get psychotic when called on to do so.Nolan. said:If that was to me I was more referring to his one console future musings than his ranting on here.
At least his...eccentricities.... are not directly affecting the gameplay...I mean...it's not like he's not giving giant mechanical spider enemies names like "The Graceful Kiss Amongst the Snow"Nolan. said:I'm not sure if he should shut up completely, just know when to and what to talk about. He gets thrown a question about the theme of his game and he starts talking about dark sides of technology. He's asked about mechanics and he starts talking about professors and technology again.
eznark said:I like how the one decent thing he tried to do (apologize man to man) is somehow retold as if he was a stalker tracking a detractor.
Come on, the guy is awkward enough without reinterpreting the story.
Kind of a half-assed apology seeing as he's lying about the guy, anyway. Or did kittonwy really avoid GAF for months? Personally, I would rather he not act the arm-chair detective, cyberstalk a poster until he can find a living address, and then show up on their doorstop.eznark said:I like how the one decent thing he tried to do (apologize man to man) is somehow retold as if he was a stalker tracking a detractor.
Come on, the guy is awkward enough without reinterpreting the story.
eznark said:I like how the one decent thing he tried to do (apologize man to man) is somehow retold as if he was a stalker tracking a detractor.
Come on, the guy is awkward enough without reinterpreting the story.
Nolan. said:If that was to me I was more referring to his one console future musings than his ranting on here.
Hypno Funk said:I always thought it was the game that should do the talking, any secondary justification or developers notes prior to release show signs of a lacking confidence in a game.
Alternatively, it can show too much confidence in their product, one that isn't shared by the rest of the public.
I haven't played the game, so I can't make a judgement, but it seems we never saw people from Rockstar, Bungie, Valve and a whole host of other developers get side-tracked into the philosphy portrayed in books and so on, and then try and drag that into the games industry, and the way it behaves.
I want to play games, I want to have fun, this is not fun, stick to the games!
eznark said:I like how the one decent thing he tried to do (apologize man to man) is somehow retold as if he was a stalker tracking a detractor.
Come on, the guy is awkward enough without reinterpreting the story.
RubberJohnny said:But his point is bad for the industry, all of his efforts to 'change the industry' simply remove all forms of criticism or possible negativity (including fan opinion) until the actual reviews hit, and by then the pre-orders are already sent out.
He wants to shut down trade conferences because games can have bad showings, previews because they can be judgemental and fan opinion or speculation because it can be negative.
This doesn't help the media, it doesn't help good developers and it sure as hell doesn't help gamers. The only people it would help would be those with a bad product to sell, since the critical structure to allow people to filter out the good from the bad would be gone, and even if they get bad reviews, the pre-orders are sent out and people have had their fingers burnt.
That's why people are so sceptical about him, for someone to argue so strongly for such a cause would seem to be an admission that the product they are trying to sell is sub-par, and a pre-emptive damage control or laying of blame for its lack of quality or sales.
I think Dyack cares deeply about the games he creates, and putting all of the bluster aside, I think he knows there's something a bit rotten with Too Human.