As far as I can tell it's a great port.
Runs at 50-60 FPS for me at 2560x1440 with 2xMSAA and all other settings at the "Ultra" preset (except for chromatic aberration and sharpening, which I disabled).
Really good IQ.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided PC performance thread
- Thread starter JaseC
- Start date
Runs at 50-60 FPS for me at 2560x1440 with 2xMSAA and all other settings at the "Ultra" preset (except for chromatic aberration and sharpening, which I disabled).
Really good IQ.
Laurentius
Member
amf05
Last edited:
I'll hold off on my playthrough then, thanks! That's what I get for preordering..
The rest is great, 150fps on i7-6700K and 980Ti, some settings like shadows turned to medium. Thinking about setting my display to 100Hz to set the shadows higher.
By the way that "Sharpening" option should be turned off by default, looks god-awful on my end.
Kenzodielocke
Banned
Played the first mission, preset high, sharpness off, FoV at 85 %
Got 60fps most of the time, never dropped below 55fps.
i5 6600k, 970 and 16GB ram, all stock.
Seems like a good port?
Got 60fps most of the time, never dropped below 55fps.
i5 6600k, 970 and 16GB ram, all stock.
Seems like a good port?
Lactose_Intolerant
Member
Like you said, stuff can be borked or the artists don't know what they are doing.
I once knew a studio that could double the amount of player ai in a racing game by turning down the amount of particles in a smoke trail coming off of a rocket.
Chris_Rivera
Member
Just started the first level, everything max but AA off @ 1440p. 6900k 1080sli
Just under 60fps. Lowering contact shadows and volumetric lighting a notch pushed it closer to 90fps, but the IQ drop was noticeable. Will have zero problems enjoying this game.
I do feel like there is some latency with a controller.
Just under 60fps. Lowering contact shadows and volumetric lighting a notch pushed it closer to 90fps, but the IQ drop was noticeable. Will have zero problems enjoying this game.
I do feel like there is some latency with a controller.
Jesus, thats bad. Doesn't bode well for my 4670k/1060 combo :/
constantstatic
Member
Same here at high with contact hardening and tessalation I average around 47fps with my 970 at 1080p. I got sick of playing with it and just locked the game at 30fps. Was hoping to get 1080p 60fps on high but no dice atleast In the benchmark.
I'm using an overclocked 1080. I'd say running the highest settings available in the game on high-end hardware at 2560x1440 with 2xMSAA is a good show performance wise.
It also seems to scale well across a wide variety of hardware with its settings, something many recent ports fail to do.
hbkajshdvfbkjhvgkahsgdfka
Member
i5 4690K @ 3.50GHz
GTX 970 4GB
8GB RAM
This is what I'm getting on the High preset @ 1920x1080, vsync off:
What graphic option is making the performance so bad?
GTX 970 4GB
8GB RAM
This is what I'm getting on the High preset @ 1920x1080, vsync off:
What graphic option is making the performance so bad?
d00d3n
Member
I just tested contact hardening shadows "very high" compared with "off". No difference in frame rate. Avg 37.9, min 31.8 and max 44.6 compared with avg 37.9, min 31.7, and max 45.5.
Seems like a port where Carmack's tweet is relevant.
Even a 980 barely gets above 60fps on medium. PS4 probably use a mixture of medium/high settings so you need much stronger hardware to just match the PS4. Some pretty bad optimization.
DF will be interesting.
/facepalm. This post taken out of context every time.
I'm getting 55.5 minimum, 67fps average, 80fps max - high presets with tessellation added
Laurentius
Member
KWMqs
Last edited:
Good AI can have a pretty big impact - it's definitely noticeable in Rainbow Six Siege which has some god-tier AI. In DE:MD's hubs maybe there's a lot of AI work going on?
Also I guess it just depends on how the engine handles the load between CPU and GPU for various things.
DeathSparks
Member
Contact Hardening Shadows from my understanding
NeoRaider
Member
This is so incredibly fucking stupid.Seems like a port where Carmack's tweet is relevant.
Even a 980 barely gets above 60fps on medium. PS4 probably use a mixture of medium/high settings so you need much stronger hardware to just match the PS4. Some pretty bad optimization.
DF will be interesting.
I'm looking forward to seeing what settings PS4 (which runs 30 FPS by the way, so you have a factor of 2 right there) actually uses, and how it actually compares to PC hardware at those settings.
Gemüsepizza
Member
i7 4790K @ 4.6 GHz | 32 GB RAM | 980Ti OC
1440p / Ultra Preset / 16x AF / No MSAA
Benchmark results:
AVG: 40.9
MIN: 33
MAX: 50.5
Meh, I guess I will use these settings for now. I might reduce some setting if the frame rate bothers me too much. But I must say, the game looks better than I anticipated from viewing the videos, very clean image quality.
I was thinking about wether I want to use M/KB or gamepad for this game, but after a few seconds with M/KB and not finding acceptable sensitivity settings, I quickly switched to my gamepad. Much better.
Better imo. I didn't really like the TAA in F4 / SW:BF, too blurry for my liking. But it looks pretty nice in this game.
1440p / Ultra Preset / 16x AF / No MSAA
Benchmark results:
AVG: 40.9
MIN: 33
MAX: 50.5
Meh, I guess I will use these settings for now. I might reduce some setting if the frame rate bothers me too much. But I must say, the game looks better than I anticipated from viewing the videos, very clean image quality.
I was thinking about wether I want to use M/KB or gamepad for this game, but after a few seconds with M/KB and not finding acceptable sensitivity settings, I quickly switched to my gamepad. Much better.
Better imo. I didn't really like the TAA in F4 / SW:BF, too blurry for my liking. But it looks pretty nice in this game.
White Wolf
Member
wtf? that can't be right. at what resolution?
Is this the final download? Or will there be an immediate patch?
Edit: I don't know why its not displaying the dl speed. Don't know if I can make it tonight or just wait til tomorrow.
I think it's unpacking the game and will start downloading the rest once the unpack is done. Unpack might take an hour or so, depending on your hard drive.
7DollarHagane
Banned
Anyone playing with 8gb ram? Seeing any problems with that?
dgrdsv
Member
No. It's very unlikely that this variation of CHS will have a big performance hit on any modern h/w as it is back from 2009 I think.
d00d3n
Member
Is that in the benchmark or in-game?
Lister
Banned
Pretty much every reviewer that's compared the platforms says PS4 is a mix of low and medium, with perhaps a setting at high. So no. This is almost ALWAYS the same too. Every time a new multi-platform game comes out, everyone says PS4 will be medium or high. And lamost every time it turns out it's mostly a mix of medium and low with maybe one setting up to high (usually textures) or a setting that's avialble on PC at high, but rendered/sampled at a much lower resolution (like volumetric fog effects)..
Whats your download speed?
In game.
hbkajshdvfbkjhvgkahsgdfka
Member
VisceralBowl
Member
vram? or normal ram?
DeathSparks
Member
Ok I think I found out what the solution to the problem that most people are having.
Turn off MSAA and either put Volumetric Lighting on On or Off. Do not set it to Ultra. Both of these settings are HUGE performance killers.
Turn off MSAA and either put Volumetric Lighting on On or Off. Do not set it to Ultra. Both of these settings are HUGE performance killers.
Laurentius
Member
EWtWO
Last edited:
j0hnny_385
Member
Welp...
I'll try my i5-4670k with 970 and 16 GB RAM. :O
Will be very interested to hear what this performs like, as we have the same CPU and my GPU is only one or 2 steps above a 970
Collateral22
Member
Getting a pretty solid 60fps on High preset with CA off on my 970, i5-6600k and 8GB RAM
I'm having no issue at all with the performance.
In fact, I really appreciate the wealth of meaningful graphical options in this port.
(I do have one problem with it, and that's mouse acceleration)
MSAA and volumetric lighting require performance? Who would have thought
(But really, I'm quite certain a lot of the "outraged" people have MSAA on. Probably should have put that [greatly appreciated] setting in an ini file just because people can't be trusted with some options)
DeathSparks
Member
I have it disabled already.
Ok then and either put Volumetric Lighting on or off but don't put it to ultra, also be sure to disable MSAA because there's two types of AA in the game and enabling both of them causes huge performance issues.
I'm getting around the same benchmarks whether I change the texture detail to very high or ultra or turn on and off contact shadows (52fps avg, 30fps min). Is the benchmark just not working correctly? The only setting that made a visible difference in frame rate in the benchmark was MSAA.
i7 3770k
AMD 390
16gb RAM
i7 3770k
AMD 390
16gb RAM
Gemüsepizza
Member
I get twice as much fps at 1440p / Ultra with a comparable hardware configuration. That's not normal. Do you have the latest game ready drivers installed? Is MSAA disabled? If this doesn't work, do you have a tool where you can view hardware usage and frequencies during gaming?
ehead
Member
Alright, thanks. I have it installed in my SSD, so hopefully I get to run it tonight and post my benchmark results.
I have everything as high as possible. Turned off CA, sharpening, and contact shadows, and it runs great with 8gb.
VisceralBowl
Member
Runs pretty great for me so far.
i5 3570k@4.2
16GB DDR3
980 TI
HDD
60FPS avg so far during real gameplay. Benchmark gives me 40 avg but I can't seem to get it past 43 even with everything turned off.
1440p
MSAA OFF
i5 3570k@4.2
16GB DDR3
980 TI
HDD
60FPS avg so far during real gameplay. Benchmark gives me 40 avg but I can't seem to get it past 43 even with everything turned off.
1440p
MSAA OFF
Similar threads
- Poll