Did Sony just screw me?

I waited a long time to get a refund and I got one, or so it seems. There's one that says -$106.99 and above it says +$106.99. Wouldn't that come out to $0?
 
Christian Bale Wow GIF by ProBit Global
 
Can you go back into your transaction history to see if the original charge is even still there to see if the math works out to see if the refund was valid?
 
Your transactions might just be lumped together for some reason with the - one being the original purchase and the + being the refund.

Wouldn't it be easier to just see if you have more money in your account/wallet?
 
To reiterate .. if you spent 100 and they give you 100 back then you spent zero. They are not going to give 100 more.
 
A refund from Sony?

Question Mark What GIF by MOODMAN
I've gotten 2 refunds from Sony, and 1 from Nintendo.

1st Sony refund was Cyberpunk, but the second one was some game I bought on accident alongside another and never downloaded. The support person gave me a one time refund. Nintendo refunded something but I can't remember what it was.
 
You bought something for $106.99... And then they refunded you for $106.99?
Presimably, they took $106.99 again and then gave it back, so they refunded $0 out of the original amount. However, as someone pointed out, the recent -106.99 might just be the original transaction rather than second charge.
 
Last edited:
I've gotten 2 refunds from Sony, and 1 from Nintendo.

1st Sony refund was Cyberpunk, but the second one was some game I bought on accident alongside another and never downloaded. The support person gave me a one time refund. Nintendo refunded something but I can't remember what it was.
oh yea, I actually forgot about them oking refunds for Cyberpunk. I got something from Amazon stating they were open to refunds for it, but decided to keep it during that whole fiasco.. Put around 60 something hours in it and never looked back lol
 
oh yea, I actually forgot about them oking refunds for Cyberpunk.
For the record, and for the umpteenth time (people seem to consistently get this wrong) - what happened was, CDPR put out a statement saying everyone could get a refund. To which Sony replied "ok... I guess, also we'll be delisting the game".

So yes, Sony did give out refunds. But the delisting was not because of the quality of the game, or lack thereof. It was simply because Sony doesn't do refunds. (which is a whole another issue, but it's what it is)
 
Last edited:
For the record, and for the umpteenth time (people seem to consistently get this wrong) - what happened was, CDPR put out a statement saying everyone could get a refund. To which Sony replied "ok... I guess, also we'll be delisting the game".

So yes, Sony did give out refunds. But the delisting was not because of the quality of the game, or lack thereof. It was simply because Sony doesn't do refunds. (which is a whole another issue, but it's what it is)
'The fall didn't kill him, the ground did'

I mean I see the distinction you're making, but the removal was still absolutely a consequence of the (lack of) quality of the game.
 
'The fall didn't kill him, the ground did'

I mean I see the distinction you're making, but the removal was still absolutely a consequence of the (lack of) quality of the game.
Oh sure, but OTOH, we have shit like "Life of a Black Tiger", so... I haven't browsed the bargain bin in PSN in ages, I don't know if there's so much shovelware anymore, but at one point, lack of quality wasn't a factor in whether a game gets published there.
 
Top Bottom