Support NeoGAF

[GoldenEye Samurai]

I waited a long time to get a refund and I got one, or so it seems. There's one that says -$106.99 and above it says +$106.99. Wouldn't that come out to $0?

 

[darrylgorn]

 

[DaleinCalgary]

Your math is correct

 

[Scrawnton]

Can you go back into your transaction history to see if the original charge is even still there to see if the math works out to see if the refund was valid?

 

[jm89]

 

[RoboFu]

lol 200 - 100 + 100 = 200

 

[adamsapple]

I waited a long time to get a refund and I got one, or so it seems. There's one that says -$106.99 and above it says +$106.99. Wouldn't that come out to $0?

 

[HRK69]

PlayStation Support

www.playstation.com

 

[Killer8]

They money has to leave the account before it comes back.

 

[Mr Hyde]

A refund from Sony?

 

[ReBurn]

 

[hououinkyouma00]

Your transactions might just be lumped together for some reason with the - one being the original purchase and the + being the refund.

Wouldn't it be easier to just see if you have more money in your account/wallet?

 

[Kacho]

This is too Friday for me

 

[RoboFu]

To reiterate .. if you spent 100 and they give you 100 back then you spent zero. They are not going to give 100 more.

 

[hououinkyouma00]

A refund from Sony?

I've gotten 2 refunds from Sony, and 1 from Nintendo.

1st Sony refund was Cyberpunk, but the second one was some game I bought on accident alongside another and never downloaded. The support person gave me a one time refund. Nintendo refunded something but I can't remember what it was.

 

[omegasc]

Next week on GAF: "help! I was banned from PSN!"

 

[Guilty_AI]

you're a sony client so that's a yes by default

 

[Mr Moose]

You bought something for $106.99... And then they refunded you for $106.99?

 

[R6Rider]

You paid 107. So then you had -107. Then they refunded you, so +107.

Am I missing something?

 

[Gaiff]

You bought something for $106.99... And then they refunded you for $106.99?

Presimably, they took $106.99 again and then gave it back, so they refunded $0 out of the original amount. However, as someone pointed out, the recent -106.99 might just be the original transaction rather than second charge.

 

[simpatico]

Oh, so it's fine if they refund you, but when you refund them it's a big deal? Gamers today man.

 

[Kilau]

 

[Ailike]

Shit. I logged onto NeoWellsFargo by mistake it seems.

 

[Plies]

 

[poodaddy]

Shit. I logged onto NeoWellsFargo by mistake it seems.

Very underrated post.

 

[lughnasadh123]

It's numbers, man.

 

[calico]

It's fifty-one five vig-wise, Artie... and technically you already missed a payment.

 

[Ozzie666]

Brett screwed Brett.

 

[Viruz]

 

[EDMIX]

I've gotten 2 refunds from Sony, and 1 from Nintendo.

1st Sony refund was Cyberpunk, but the second one was some game I bought on accident alongside another and never downloaded. The support person gave me a one time refund. Nintendo refunded something but I can't remember what it was.

oh yea, I actually forgot about them oking refunds for Cyberpunk. I got something from Amazon stating they were open to refunds for it, but decided to keep it during that whole fiasco.. Put around 60 something hours in it and never looked back lol

 

[EDMIX]

Brett screwed Brett.

lol yessssssssssssssssss!

Semi OT, Netflix need to fucking run me that entire classics Raw series

 

[nowhat]

oh yea, I actually forgot about them oking refunds for Cyberpunk.

For the record, and for the umpteenth time (people seem to consistently get this wrong) - what happened was, CDPR put out a statement saying everyone could get a refund. To which Sony replied "ok... I guess, also we'll be delisting the game".

So yes, Sony did give out refunds. But the delisting was not because of the quality of the game, or lack thereof. It was simply because Sony doesn't do refunds. (which is a whole another issue, but it's what it is)

 

[calico]

For the record, and for the umpteenth time (people seem to consistently get this wrong) - what happened was, CDPR put out a statement saying everyone could get a refund. To which Sony replied "ok... I guess, also we'll be delisting the game".

So yes, Sony did give out refunds. But the delisting was not because of the quality of the game, or lack thereof. It was simply because Sony doesn't do refunds. (which is a whole another issue, but it's what it is)

'The fall didn't kill him, the ground did'

I mean I see the distinction you're making, but the removal was still absolutely a consequence of the (lack of) quality of the game.

 

[nowhat]

'The fall didn't kill him, the ground did'

I mean I see the distinction you're making, but the removal was still absolutely a consequence of the (lack of) quality of the game.

Oh sure, but OTOH, we have shit like "Life of a Black Tiger", so... I haven't browsed the bargain bin in PSN in ages, I don't know if there's so much shovelware anymore, but at one point, lack of quality wasn't a factor in whether a game gets published there.

 

[Thebonehead]

.Nintendo refunded something but I can't remember what it was.

Your soul.

 

[ArtHands]

OP hope you get the resolve you need