DeathGuise
Member
Playing anything at 40 fps is a criminal offense
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Digital Foundry - Horizon Forbidden West PC vs PS5: Enhanced Features, Performance Tests + Image Quality Boosts!
- Thread starter Gaiff
- Start date
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Contrast and saturation sliders on 100.A couple more screenshots on PC in 4K Ultrawide.
Last edited:
YeulEmeralda
Linux User
Mods make PC far superior in all cases.
zeroluck
Member
Need proper water physics to get good looking waterfall and etc. Otherwise just bad reflection, SSR haloing against plants, it looks too inconsistent. Underwater is terrible as every other games, can we have ray traced refraction next gen? Haven't got to the sea yet.
Last edited:
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
It's definitely a looker.
blastprocessor
The Amiga Brotherhood
mayham2199
Member
I loved the story. Loved everything about this game honestly thought it was great. Glad to see PC players get to continue the story. My favorite new IP from Sony in a long time.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
I have less time to play games so I use trainers when I can. I don't go extreme either just some fast leveling which I do anyways. I do want the challenge but don't want the struggle and time waste. It's worked out well while enjoying games on PC.
This will definitely get over games like this quicker which are far less interesting than something Like Infinite Wealth (to me).
GymWolf
Member
Even without all of that i would argue it's still top 5 best water in gaming look wise and wave tech wise.
Sure as the fucking hell it doesn't look bad
DanielG165
Member
Oh yeah, like GoW 2018 is an entirely different beast on PC compared to PS4, even on the Pro.
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
No because you need to play the main story to unlock the DLC. Didn’t Frozen Wilds give you an option to start with the DLC?
Last edited:
ChiefDada
Gold Member
Ah yes you're right about BS. Idk about frozen wilds.
ResilientBanana
Member
This is fun.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
Gudji
Member
No, you had to reach lvl 15 if my memory doesn't fail me. Then you could go into a specific spot in the map and start frozen wilds.
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Isn't that the same thing as what I said?
Gudji
Member
I thought you meant you could start it at the start menu or something. My bad.
Last edited:
Masterofchapter
Banned
Because it is a linear game disguised as open world if it have npc interaction like ubisoft games it won't run well
James Sawyer Ford
Member
What does this have to do with the conversation and topic?
GametimeUK
Member
But the conversation isn't about mods. It was about Alex claiming than the graphics in the vanilla PC experience are far superior than the console experience.
Mod support has nothing to do with refuting that posters argument.
Last edited:
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
He never claimed that. He said the image quality is far superior with DLSS.
GametimeUK
Member
Switch "Graphics" with "Image Quality" in my post then I mis-spoken and the point still stands.
Thanks for the correction.
Last edited:
playsaves3
Banned
The pc version here just looks like what the ps5 pro will run it at
playsaves3
Banned
It’s saying on benchmarks with a 7800x3d a 4090 does around 70 fps on average at 4k I’d assume the ps5 pro will run Fidelity mode at 60 which is 4k mostly max settings so that wouldn’t be much different from a 4090
playsaves3
Banned
I feel like it mostly looks like the ps5 fidelity mode (with the option for different taa)
playsaves3
Banned
The 4090 can’t do 4k 120 here it’s 4k mostly 70-90
playsaves3
Banned
I’m pretty sure on fidelity mode all the settings are max except for af and maybe draw distance
yamaci17
Member
at least pc has the option to disable the sharpening though (which i dont like in this game)
playsaves3
Banned
Isn’t the pro expected to be about a 7800xt? Why would the 6700xt outperform it?
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Talking about the $1200-1500 build.
cinnamonandgravy
Member
graphics look great, and im a bit fat graphics whore... but something about the world, characters, and gameplay
Physiognomonics
Member
Combat against machines is great (it was even better in the first game IMO). But yes the rest is underwhelming notably the incredibly uninteresting world. And the game is super woke, obviously, but that wouldn't be a problem if gameplay, characters and world were interesting.graphics look great, and im a bit fat graphics whore... but something about the world, characters, and gameplay
GametimeUK
Member
I tried this game on PS5 to get a look at the graphics and that's about it. I never spent any time with it.
But I must say on a 4080 at 4K DLSS dynamic resolution / performance mode this game looks great.
Getting between 90 and 120fps along with the breathtaking visuals. It's up there along with Alan Wake and Ratchet & Clank as the best looking games I've ever played.
Great port, but frame generation causes stutter / screen tearing for me
But I must say on a 4080 at 4K DLSS dynamic resolution / performance mode this game looks great.
Getting between 90 and 120fps along with the breathtaking visuals. It's up there along with Alan Wake and Ratchet & Clank as the best looking games I've ever played.
Great port, but frame generation causes stutter / screen tearing for me
DeaDPo0L84
Member
People always solely focus on "looks". PC is more than just a few graphics sliders. It's also the fact that it can be run at much higher framerates and has mod support. You can say those things don't matter to you and that's perfectly fine but I dont get why people have to downplay advantages due to preferring a certain method of playing a videogame.
DeaDPo0L84
Member
Bro some of you people seriously need to log off and get back to just enjoying videogames. All this name calling and being so insecure cause of videogames is legit embarrassing. Some of you remind me of when I used to visit gamefaqs, grow up a bit.
Last edited:
playsaves3
Banned
At 4k max settings your not getting super high frame rate the 4090 can only manage a 70 average which is not gonna be that different from the ps5 pros expected 60
DeaDPo0L84
Member
Bro I have a 4090 playing @ 4k ultrawide and it never dips below 100fps. You're also literally just pulling info from your ass, you're out of your mind if you think the PS5 Pro is going to be 4090 level, and this is coming from someone who is going to buy one. I swear some of you fanboys go way too hard for this nonsense.
Zathalus
Member
The 120 I was talking about was with frame generation enabled.
The PS5 Pro will not be powerful enough to do native 4k 60 in this game. It will require PSSR to do so (which will be fine). But a 4090 with DLSS Quality is around double that, or higher with frame generation.
Bojji
Member
You are reaching here dude.
PS5 is able to run this game in native 4K - 30FPS
PS5 Pro that is supposed to be 45% more powerful will run it in - 44FPS (or 49FPS if that 63% GPU TF power update can be fully utilized)
On Pro graphics 40FPS mode will run in native 4K vs 1920x2160CB that it's running right now.
I saw benches in VH mode that is above high mode that PS5 is using:
Last edited:
OverHeat
« generous god »
How did you get the cutscene in ultrawide???Some more pics on PC in 4K Ultrawide with DLSS Quality
There is a option in the settings to enable Ultrawide in cutscenes.
Desprado123
Member
Running at 4K DLSS Performance Max Out.
playsaves3
Banned
I didnt know we were counting frame gen cause I thought the implication of yo ur statement was native frames. Really don’t see why the pro won’t do 4k 60 (I’m speaking about a dedicated patch) in this game it probably will cut it close and maybe a occasionally drop but it really should be able to do 55-60. I think pssr 2 will be applied to the performance and balance modes
Bojji
Member
Because it won't be powerful enough, we are talking about 100% more power needed to render this game in 60fps instead of 30FPS PS5 version in native 4K.
This console will be at best 63% more powerful but Sony claims 45% in real world, it's far from 100% isn't it? Plus memory bandwidth increase is rather small, 4K oriented GPUs usually have around ~720GB/s or more (960GB/s for 7900XTX) to feed GPU the needed data, Pro will have just 576GB/s (shared with CPU). Not to mention that RDNA3 have large L3 cache (infinity cache) and Ada cards have large L2 cache, nothing like that on Pro.
You are ignoring the data and making shit up or what?
Last edited: