Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
There isn't an FOV slider in the console version? Because there is one in HZD for PC.Besides changing the aspect ratio is there an actual fov option for this console port?
There isn't an FOV slider in the console version? Because there is one in HZD for PC.Besides changing the aspect ratio is there an actual fov option for this console port?
When did said mockery occur?
As far as I remember, that was certainly one aspect of the PS5 design that was very well received, and - if anything - expectations were even higher than current reality we’ve seen.
I’m not sure why the author of the video never pointed this out, that stuff matters.There isn't an FOV slider in the console version? Because there is one in HZD for PC.
According to Steam Survey result of Feb 2024, 0.90% of the asked/users have a 4090.I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
Lol pretty much.PC gamers don’t like to admit that graphics aren’t much different to consoles, hence why they always focus on frame rate.
Maybe because there is no version of Horizon Forbidden West for the Series S/X consoles.
Unfortunately I think so yeah, among enthusiasts we’re fairly common I think but among mainstream gamers we’re just an annoying tiny group of overspending lunatics.I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
PC gamers don’t like to admit that graphics aren’t much different to consoles, hence why they always focus on frame rate.
You think normies will spend $1500+ on a gpu? That's the 1%I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
1700 and no I don't think so, but maybe just a mention?You think normies will spend $1500+ on a gpu? That's the 1%
And? Ports can look better vs original game release, depending on the hardware and effort in the porting process. Realistically, Sony isn't going to invest in making a PC port of their games look noticably better.It’s a port, not a remake. Running higher frame rates at higher resolutions and higher settings requires a lot more power.
Lol pretty much.
Watching this video on my OLED right now and all this video does is show how close PS5 is to PC.
So close, that if going by these Playstation PC port comparisons, there is very little reason to go PC over console.
Hey in my defense, I almost threw up after impulse buying the card. Literally ran to Gaf like a lil bitch and made a thread about it.Unfortunately I think so yeah, among enthusiasts we’re fairly common I think but among mainstream gamers we’re just an annoying tiny group of overspending lunatics.
I’ll hopefully try it out in a couple hours, downloading on both PCs, one with a 7900x+4090 and one with a 7800x3d+4080S.
It's the exact same game. Were you somehow expecting them to remodel the characters and overhaul the entire lighting model and replace it with RTGI?Lol pretty much.
Watching this video on my OLED right now and all this video does is show how close PS5 is to PC.
So close, that if going by these Playstation PC port comparisons, there is very little reason to go PC over console.
But at least is better and cheaper.So what is the verdict? Another safe, lazy port that barely improve a game that originally run on a fucking 2070super and laptop cpu?
Barely.But at least is better and cheaper.
Rip in peace PS5 magic SSD.
Direct storage putting in work.
Yea it wasn't great even at launch so that makes sense but the 5800X 3D is gonna eat it's lunch.well yeah 3700x aged really fast tho
I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
I wouldn't call this a lazy port. It's a competent port that offers little over the original but runs well and has nice QOL features like ultrawide, frame generation, and DLSS.So what is the verdict? Another safe, lazy port that barely improve a game that originally run on a fucking 2070super and laptop cpu?
It was fine but maybe for a year or two.Yea it wasn't great even at launch so that makes sense but the 5800X 3D is gonna eat it's lunch.
Just saying what I see.It's the exact same game. Were you somehow expecting them to remodel the characters and overhaul the entire lighting model and replace it with RTGI?
Some of you guys are just so damn insecure about your favorite toys.
Grow up.
But it didn't stop there. You're trying to use this as a justification to diminish PC. "Hur hur hur, you don't need a PC," completely omitting the fact that you can run DLSS at 1800p Performance Mode and get better image Quality than on PS5, something that probably requires an RTX 2060.Just saying what I see.
This video does show how close PS5 is to PC.
What has this got to do with anything? This a port of a PS5 game. For it to look different, they'd have to completely revamp several things which wouldn't make sense. It doesn't make PC any less good because of this. You'd know this, but you're more interested in platform warring than a genuine discussion. Does little Timmy feel better knowing PC doesn't make his purchase worthless? Does he need his pacifier?Or do you rather we'd compare HFW to Dragon's Dogma 2, which had PC as lead-platform?
From a console-gamer's perspective, that's true.But it didn't stop there. You're trying to use this as a justification to diminish PC. "Hur hur hur, you don't need a PC," completely omitting the fact that you can run DLSS at 1800p Performance Mode and get better image Quality than on PS5, something that probably requires an RTX 2060.
It's to point out that what you're saying is irrelevant, as PS5 is more than capable to compete with games that did have PC as lead-platform.What has this got to do with anything? This a port of a PS5 game. For it to look different, they'd have to completely revamp several things which wouldn't make sense. It doesn't make PC any less good because of this. You'd know this, but you're more interested in platform warring than a genuine discussion.
I know people chose to play on pc for a multitude of reasons, but i play on pc to play MUCH BETTER than console, so a port like this is utterly useless to me.I wouldn't call this a lazy port. It's a competent port that offers little over the original but runs well and has nice QOL features like ultrawide, frame generation, and DLSS.
No, that's moronic because no one is going to invest in a PC build just to play one game. Furthermore, PCs can range from cheap to very expensive. Does this game being similar on both platforms somehow invalidate all the games that aren't similar? What about Cyberpunk with path tracing. Did it stop working on PC following the release of this game?From a console-gamer's perspective, that's true.
Again, stupid argument. What investment? Is this the only game out there?DF compares PS5 to PC in this video, so don't complain when someone points out that both are close enough to make a valid statement that PC might not be worth the investment for minimal visual differences.
I don't mind the discussion but this isn't what it is. This isn't you simply pointing out that this game isn't much better on PC, this is you trying to bring down the entire platform because a single game that is a PS5 port doesn't look leaps and bounds better on PC.It's to point out that what you're saying is irrelevant, as PS5 is more than capable to compete with games that did have PC as lead-platform.
If people don't like this discussion, then ask DF to make not make a direct comparison between PS5 and PC.
Cyberpunk lacks the polish a game like HFW has.No, that's moronic because no one is going to invest in a PC build just to play one game. Furthermore, PCs can range from cheap to very expensive. Does this game being similar on both platforms somehow invalidate all the games that aren't similar? What about Cyberpunk with path tracing. Did it stop working on PC following the release of this game?
When a high-end graphics card is more expensive than a console, it most definitely is an investment.Again, stupid argument. What investment? Is this the only game out there?
I don't mind the discussion but this isn't what it is. This isn't you simply pointing out that this game isn't much better on PC, this is you trying to bring down the entire platform because a single game that is a PS5 port doesn't look leaps and bounds better on PC.
And Horizon lacks a halfway decent lighting model. Besides that's not even the point, the point is that supposedly, Horizon looking similar on PC makes the whole platform worthless. Clearly, Cyberpunk cancels that out because it looks much better on PC. What about Alan Wake 2? People were pissing and moaning here because of the awful image quality on consoles. Skull & Bones runs at an internal resolution of 720p on consoles and the image quality is a mess. Baldur's Gate 3 tanks to 20fps on consoles with shitty 4x AF and so on. I could go on but you get it.Cyberpunk lacks the polish a game like HFW has.
As do most PC exclusive games, or those with PC as lead-platform.
You don't need an high-end graphics card to play this game? Alex just ran it on a 2070S+3600. On what part of the globe is this a high-end rig?This is exactly what diminishing returns is all about.
When a high-end graphics card is more expensive than a console, it most definitely is an investment.
You literally made that shit up and thank you for admitting you weren't actually interested in discussing the game but merely wanted your gotcha moment. HFW looks similar on PC, everyone! Throw away your rigs. You don't need them anymore.And who is acting insecure now? All I said was that based on this comparison, PC isn't worth the investment for the minimal visual upgrade. I was expecting much more since PC gamers always brag about how they will wait for the PC port, which is always supposedly vastly superior.
The PC version has unlimited resolution and framerate. Unlimited. If you don't understand why that's a big deal - being that you are most probably a warring console peasant who will lord it over Xbox fans when your version of the game has a mere 5% performance advantage - I have nothing more to say.Just saying what I see.
This video does show how close PS5 is to PC.
Or do you rather want to compare HFW to Dragon's Dogma 2, which had PC as lead-platform?
I hear you but we got a decent port. We really aren't entitled to more. It's awesome when they add new stuff like RT but if not, no big deal.I know people chose to play on pc for a multitude of reasons, but i play on pc to play MUCH BETTER than console, so a port like this is utterly useless to me.
Which is what is most important. It's not a disaster like TLOU. It scales well enough above PS5 in terms of IQ and frame rates and is stable. All I ask is a game that runs well and looks at least as good as its console counterpart with unlocked frame rates, upscaling options, ultrawide, and frame generation. Anything more is an awesome bonus.I guess it's a good port for people without a ps5.
The PC version has unlimited resolution and framerate. Unlimited. If you don't understand why that's a big deal - being that you are most probably a warring console peasant who will lord it over Xbox fans when your version of the game has a mere 5% performance advantage - I have nothing more to say.
It will already obliterate what a PS5 Pro could do with this game on a 4090. And guess what? Nvidia's next gen is right around the corner...
People on Gaf are bitching and moaning all the time, when in reality games like Cyberpunk and AW2 have minimal visual differences with consoles when just playing the game or seeing the comparions, unless you go zoom in and get into technicalities.And Horizon lacks a halfway decent lighting model. Besides that's not even the point, the point is that supposedly, Horizon looking similar on PC makes the whole platform worthless. Clearly, Cyberpunk cancels that out because it looks much better on PC. What about Alan Wake 2? People were pissing and moaning here because of the awful image quality. Skull & Bones runs at an internal resolution of 720p on consoles and the image quality is a mess. Baldur's Gate 3 tanks to 20fps on consoles with shitty 4x AF and so on. I could go on but you get it.
No shit. But the most notable difference would be between consoles and high-end PCs.You don't need an high-end graphics card to play this game? Alex just ran it on a 2070S+3600. On what part of the globe is this a high-end rig?
Who was insecure again?You literally made that shit up and thank you for admitting you weren't actually interested in discussing the game but merely wanted your gotcha moment. HFW looks similar on PC, everyone! Throw away your rigs. You don't need them anymore.
Next time I'll add "to me" when I'm saying it's not worth the investment.Your argument makes no fucking sense. I already have a high-end rig but not a PS5. Would it make more sense for me to get this on PC or go buy a PS5 to play it? Clearly, for someone owning a PC, this is a worthwhile investment since they need something like an RTX 2060S+Ryzen 5 3600 to play at quality levels similar to PS5. Again, this is something you should know but you didn't think this through. You were too busy salivating at putting back PCMR in their place because your precious console is comparable. Wow!
Very cool, but on my tv the differences are negligible.The PC version has unlimited resolution and framerate. Unlimited. If you don't understand why that's a big deal - being that you are most probably a warring console peasant who will lord it over Xbox fans when your version of the game has a mere 5% performance advantage - I have nothing more to say.
It will already obliterate what a PS5 Pro could do with this game on a 4090. And guess what? Nvidia's next gen is right around the corner...
Ah yes, minimal differences between 874p upscaled to 1440p and 4K with path tracing. In that case, there must be no difference to you between a PS5 and a PC from the year 2016. If we're going to be dishonest, why stop there?People on Gaf are bitching and moaning all the time, when in reality games like Cyberpunk and AW2 have minimal visual differences with consoles when just playing the game or seeing the comparions, unless you go zoom in and get into technicalities.
Then clearly, PC is a worthwhile investment because having a high-powered $3000 rig isn't needed to play games.No shit. But the most notable difference would be between consoles and high-end PCs.
The manchild who was mad at PC gamers saying they always got the best version and felt the need to come to this thread just to appease his insecurities.Who was insecure again?
Next time, don't say something false and nonsensical.Next time I'll add "to me" when I'm saying it's not worth the investment.
Then you don't have to feel attacked.
Looks like the ps5 versionGame looks really great and runs really good, everything maxed out in 4K Ultrawide with DLSS Quality on a RTX 4080:
A 4060 is $299 and offers better image quality as well. You can build a 4060 PC for around $650 if that strapped for cash.
Unlimited Resolution*
*RTX 4090 not included with the game, costs $2000. RTX 5090 coming soon for $2500 **
**GPU doesn't turn on by itself, requires other PC components
The PS5 version looks like the PS4 version.Looks like the ps5 version
Here is your 4090I feel left out, why don't they talk about the 4090? Are we really so few?
Cool story.Ah yes, minimal differences between 874p upscaled to 1440p and 4K with path tracing. In that case, there must be no difference to you between a PS5 and a PC from the year 2016. If we're going to be dishonest, why stop there?
Then clearly, PC is a worthwhile investment because having a high-powered $3000 rig isn't needed to play games.
The manchild who was mad at PC gamers saying they always got the best version and felt the need to come to this thread just to appease his insecurities.
Next time, don't say something false and nonsensical.
A 4060 is $299 and offers better image quality as well. You can build a 4060 PC for around $650 if that strapped for cash.
4090 is only needed for native 4k/120 which is 4x the FPS of the PS5.
PC is worth the investment just for mouse+kb non handicapped gameplays with minimal input lag, plus ultrawide, mods, near perfect IQ, more than 60fps, forever forward compatibility, etc, etc...All I said was that based on this comparison, PC isn't worth the investment for the minimal visual upgrade.
All preferences.PC is worth the investment just for mouse+kb non handicapped gameplays with minimal input lag, plus ultrawide, mods, near perfect IQ, more than 60fps, forever forward compatibility, etc, etc...