• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Drinky Crow bought off: Microsoft paying Religious Right $20,000 a month retainer

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ruh-roh...

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/04/microsoft-paying-religious-right.html

AMERICAblog.com has learned that Microsoft is currently paying a $20,000 a month retainer to former Christian Coalition head Ralph Reed's consulting firm Century Strategies. Which now begs the question of whether Reed was in any way involved with Microsoft's recent decision to abandon its decades long support for gay civil rights in order to curry favor with anti-gay bigots of the radical right.

A few days ago, Microsoft quietly removed its support from a bill in Washington that supported, as you can see above, gay civil rights. Apparently, a minister up in Washington state caught wind of MS's support, asked for a meeting, and then warned MS that if they continue to support the civil rights bill, there would be hell to pay. A few days later, MS removes it support from the bill, effectively killing the legislation. Here's more on the Ralph Reed support:

Interestingly, Microsoft had Reed on retainer during the presidential election of 2000 to apparently help lobby then-candidate Bush on their anti-trust suit (he was actually first hired in the fall of 1998). The contract was terminated after Reed was criticized for a conflict of interest - Reed was working on Bush's campaign. The question arises when Microsoft and Reed revived their work relationship (most observers I've spoken to thought the contract ended five years ago), and what exactly Reed is working on now that the anti-trust issue is over.
Now, just think a minute. Microsoft finds itself under criticism from the local evangelical leader, religious right shareholders, bigoted employees and who knows who else. They don't know what to do. Who do they turn to? Well, if I'm in a religious right pickle, I'd turn to my $20,000 a month retainered religious right consultant, the former leader of the religious right, Ralph Reed.
And which side do we think the former head of the religious right would favor were he advising Microsoft what do when trapped between the Scylla and Charybdis of the gays vs. the religious right?

A. Stick to your guns and defend the gays? or
B. Find a way to stiff the gays and move more in line with the religious right?
Well, shiver my timbers, Microsoft ended up going with option B.
Now a few questions for Microsoft:

1. When did Microsoft hire Ralph Reed and Century Strategies again?
2. Did Microsoft have Reed/Century on retainer at any time during the 2004 election, when Reed was in charge of Bush's re-election campaign in the southeast? And if so, doesn't the same conflict again come to a head, paying $20,000 a month to a senior official in the Bush campaign?
In fact, the earliest invoice I have starts on 11/01/04, that's BEFORE the election. So Microsoft had Reed, a senior Bush campaign official, on the payroll while he was working on the campaign. Why?
3. Why did Microsoft hire Ralph Reed/Century again? What issues is the former head of the Christian Coalition providing guidance on?
4. Did Microsoft ever confer with Ralph Reed about social issues, such as, but not limited to, the current decision to abandon support for the Washington state gay rights bill?
5. Will Microsoft now abandon its contract with Ralph Reed since it has determined it no longer wishes to be involved in "social issues"? After all, social issues (like gambling) are Ralph Reed's specialty - what possible interest could Microsoft have in the former head of the religious right that don't involve his knowledge of, well, the religious right?
6. As Salon.com asked the FIRST time Microsoft hired Reed six years ago:

"But Reed is known principally not for tax cuts but for opposition to abortion, gay rights and other tenets of the Christian conservative agenda. So what gives? What is a cosmopolitan outfit like Microsoft doing hooking up with Pat Robertson's former right-hand man?"
What, indeed.
PS I know for a fact this is for real, Ralph Reed and his firm are currently on retainer with Microsoft.

There are images of the invoices in the above link. So even the mighty MS is afraid of the fundies...
 

Alcibiades

Member
I think Microsoft's hiring practices and industry standards with regard to gay employees with eventually bear out much more influence than support of some bill in Washington...

I've been to a lot of company presentations, and while a law can't force Christian bigots to place nice, company policy from their employer can...

not saying what happened is right or wrong, and in general I hate Microsoft, but from their standpoint, the support of bills is probably symbolic anyway, so why not defuse anything with the government which has gone after you while standing up for their beliefs within their own company...
 
The bill is hardly symbolic, for anyone involved. Its passing was hinged on MS's support, and they bailed at the last minute because of some extreme right-wing fundie. Not a convention of religous leaders, just one local minister who thought MS was committing an act of sin by lending its support for the bill.

There's something wrong with that.
 

Boogie

Member
So because one corporation doesn't support a bill, it won't pass? :lol

Please, tell me America isn't so beholden to corporations that they so obviously determine legislation in areas which have nothing to do with their operations.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
ok, NOW I hate MS.

Or should it be M$? M$ M$ M$ M$ M$. Gonna have to get used to that.

Watch my PS3-advocacy kick into overdrive (kidding. or am i?)
 

FoneBone

Member
Well, fortunately, they backpedaled on the bill.
May 7, 2005
Microsoft Will Back Gay Rights Legislation
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 5:29 a.m. ET

SEATTLE (AP) -- After being criticized for quietly dropping support for a state gay rights bill, Microsoft Corp. chief executive Steve Ballmer told employees Friday that management would publicly back such legislation in the future.

Ballmer's commitment came two weeks after activists accused the company of caving to pressure from an evangelical pastor who had threatened to launch a nationwide boycott of the software company.

''After looking at the question from all sides, I've concluded that diversity in the workplace is such an important issue for our business that it should be included in our legislative agenda,'' Ballmer wrote in an e-mail.

In late April, Lorri L. Jean, CEO of the L.A. Gay and Lesbian Center, asked Microsoft to return a civil rights award the group had given the company four years ago. On Friday she said Microsoft should keep the honor.

''Few of us have not made a misstep. This was a misstep. It was a big one. But Microsoft has done the right thing, and we would be proud to have them keep our award,'' Jean told The Associated Press.

Ballmer said he would not discuss what prompted Microsoft to take a neutral stance this year on a bill it had actively supported in the past.

Microsoft, one of the first companies to extend domestic partner benefits to same-sex couples, claimed that its decision came before a meeting with Ken Hutcherson, pastor of a local church who has organized anti-gay-marriage rallies in Seattle and Washington, D.C.

Hutcherson could not immediately be reached for comment Friday. He has said he pressured Microsoft after hearing two employees testify in favor of a bill before the state Legislature that would have banned discrimination against gays in housing, employment and insurance.

The bill died by a single vote in the state Senate April 21.

Liberal bloggers called the company a corporate coward and posted rallying cries for their own boycott of Microsoft products. Gay rights groups said they'd keep pressuring Microsoft until the company once again came out in support of the bill.

State Rep. Ed Murray, an openly gay Seattle Democrat who sponsored the bill, said he was thrilled Microsoft had decided to support the legislation the next time it's proposed. ''Microsoft knows diversity is just plain good business. And they know that discrimination is bad for business,'' he said in a statement released Friday afternoon.

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights group, applauded the shift.

''We are proud that Microsoft did the right thing and has come down squarely on the side of fairness for all employees,'' Solmonese said in a statement. ''It is clear from Mr. Ballmer's statement that it is a business imperative to value a diverse workforce and support public policy that reinforces that principle.''

In his e-mail Friday, Ballmer said the company would continue to focus its lobbying efforts on issues that most directly affect Microsoft, such as Internet safety, intellectual property rights, free trade and a healthy business climate.

''I'm proud of Microsoft's commitment to non-discrimination in our internal policies and benefits, but our policies can't cover the range of housing, education, financial and similar services that our people and their partners and families need.

''Therefore, it's appropriate for the company to support legislation that will promote and protect diversity in the workplace.''

Microsoft shares slipped a penny to close at $25.22 in Friday trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
 

Phoenix

Member
Microsoft should have never let themselves get involved in this stuff in ANY way on either side. They have gay employees and right wing nut jobs on the payroll - AND they represent a conglomeration of philosophies and ideals - not the type of thing best suited to taking a strong stance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom