You know there's something wrong when the controversial posts get more attention than the logical ones. Hence accountability, and people saying retarded shit just to make it stand out from the sensible posts
Dyack had a point.
This is what makes me laugh, everyone KNOWS that the level of intelligent discourse is low on the Internet, and various forums take numerous measures to counteract it, either with a paid membership feature, heavy moderation, or removal of easily abused forum features.
What is hilarious is that people see Dyack as some form of amazing intellect because he saw and regurgitated a Penny Arcade comic and it's something they can easily bandwagon on to have a bit of a moan.
Everything Dyack said that wasn't said earlier or more eloquently by numerous others was complete
BULLSHIT:
He didn't touch on what would happen to the users of forums that were shut down (they'd just move elsewhere and be even more bitter about the game that got their favourite forum closed), or the bad PR and knock-on effect on sales that shutting down forums with negative opinions would have (significantly worse than the current Too Human situation), which would completely destroy his arguments on how to improve things (make them less critical).
People who actually agree with his position seem to have thought through Dyacks arguments less than he did and fail to see how making free speech on the Internet subservient to commercial interests would be bad for gamers and the whole industry, and only good for those with a bad product to sell.
Judging by the current scoring situations, all of Dyacks statements to date on the nature of previews, forums and conferences can be seen as pre-emptive damage control.