dk_ said:
Haha, go Ari.
dk_ said:
I must admit........ I love himCalcaneus said:Reading through this thread and the Too Human review thread, you really get the impression that people actually HATE Dyack. The amount of venom spewing is really wierd.
kaching said:A shame his Insomniac podcast interview wasn't delayed just a little longer.
dk_ said:
puebla said:NERD RAGE
commariodore64 said:No - but thanks for insinuating that the GAF members are morons - at any rate, he has not shown respect for his audience. He has not shown humility.
What he has done is boast and make audacious claims and insist on his view as the truth. Not a well-tempered manner for someone with an 'audience'...
Team Klimt said:THIS is why certain people (Dyack included) think GAF is a fucking joke. Can't we allow anything to just pass into obscurity? Do we really need to dwell on this shit any longer? You are all enablers. Stirring up shit just for the hell of it. Do not encourage these types of responses!! Do we really need threads that are purely calling individuals out for being "jerks" or "assholes?" Do you know how many jerks and assholes contribute here on a daily basis? We could make a lot of threads like this, and I personally don't wanna read that garbage. I'm done now. Whew...
Philthy said:It certainly is a social forum, people discuss things, be it gaming, programming, or otherwise. The difference being that, again, it is heavily modded. You can't act like a 5 year old over there and just post dumb responses for twelve pages.
As far as Gaf going down notches, I meant as a whole. How do you think other people in the industry will look on Gaf after this entire debacle? Probably not so great. All the screaming children posting has put a lot of egg on Gafs face. The bandwagon got entirely out of control, and it's still going with new thread after new thread being posted over Dyack. It's all justifying that what Dyack said was actually true, and that's pretty sad.
Philthy said:It certainly is a social forum, people discuss things, be it gaming, programming, or otherwise. The difference being that, again, it is heavily modded. You can't act like a 5 year old over there and just post dumb responses for twelve pages.
As far as Gaf going down notches, I meant as a whole. How do you think other people in the industry will look on Gaf after this entire debacle? Probably not so great. All the screaming children posting has put a lot of egg on Gafs face. The bandwagon got entirely out of control, and it's still going with new thread after new thread being posted over Dyack. It's all justifying that what Dyack said was actually true, and that's pretty sad.
Calcaneus said:Reading through this thread and the Too Human review thread, you really get the impression that people actually HATE Dyack. The amount of venom spewing is really wierd.
sevenchaos said:Well his experiment did work.
Acosta said:Guys, I have news for you: this is EviLore's place, like it, hate it, whatever, but it's a private space with a owner who keeps it afloat because he is willing to.
His places, his rules. While I don't dislike Dyack at all I don't find hard to understand this situation, he has been trashing this place at every chance and the owner has got tired of it. End of story, cut the drama.
TheRagnCajun said:shit I thought it was Tuesday...
Reznor said:
Busty said:In short the conclusion of this series of events is a huge moment for Dyack.
For NeoGAF however, it was a Wednesday.
commariodore64 said:And I don't see screaming children (which I assume would be all CAPS, right?) - I see a lot of people expressing their OPINION on the subject.
Mamesj said:Yeah, I agree with that, though I think there are too many factors missing to consider online personas to be of any value in determining a person's true personality. That doesn't stop me from deducing things, of course, but that's just part of the game :lol
but the original issue was whether it's the "best" representation of one's "true" self. I hope for the world's sake that no one reads this situation as something truly huge and major...it's just good drama like a reality show. This seems like the equivalent of yelling at the screen while watching sports or something :lol
A Black Falcon said:banning him makes GAF look worse, I would say
junker said:I didn't mean NeoGAF but for most gamers, this is entertainment and nothing more. Only a small percentage of gamers will appeciate elaborate storytelling and characterization (not saying he accomplished this but see the MGS4 thread). Seems he learned nothing from Miyamoto or Kojima.
dude, you're making your fellow juniors look bad... :lolAFreak said:Who the fuck is this EvilLore dude, and why is he so special?
heh......TheRagnCajun said:The notion that Dyack would conduct a social experiement on 'internet forum negativity' at the expense of his own work from the last 10 years is ludacris. Its just some pseudo-intellectual BS he cooked up after the fact to try and save face. If he had just swallowed his pride and shut up after his 'for/against' thread, he would still be posting in the official TH thread with fans.
Crisis said:Well I'd like to have a quick say if nobody minds (I'm sure nobody else will care). This thread was precisely the right way to respond to Denis Dyack's stupidity. Even though it would be easy to I'm not even going to call out Dyack's flawed psychology and pseudo-intellect. For everyone saying this is childish and "Dyack is right about the forum" I have just one question to ask: If Dyack is right then why are you still here? There shouldn't be anything worthwhile about posting here at this forum if you're agreeing with Dyack.
To address Dyack directly (because in all honesty we know he's reading this): You are a huge hypocrite. You complain about GAF being "unfair" to your game and that people don't understand it. You have nobody to blame but yourself for this. You made this game with the hopes that people in this demographic would buy it and we don't like it. It's disappointing but it happens. The right thing to do is to try to figure out what people like and what people don't like about it and move on from there. Maybe patch your game to better suit the audience that you're making it for. The wrong thing to do is to blame everyone except yourself for your game being taken badly. You had a bad showing at E3 2006 not Epic. Your game is poorly animated. Your game has hilariously bad dialogue. Your game isn't any fun to play. You see where this is going? The reviews of your game are by and large reflecting this opinion.
Whether or not you like this forum or you think it's the worst ever this forum only responded to what you put out there for it. It responded to your bad E3 showing. It responded to your bad demo. It's responding to your poor review scores. It's responding to your bad game. But you know as well as I do that none of this really mattered because it wasn't profound. All you did was realize that your game wasn't going to turn out well and you started running out of things to scapegoat so you preemptively attacked the audience you were hoping to sell your game to. Anything to avoid the cold hard fact that your game just isn't that good and that you're really not that good of a developer and to try to create controversy to sell this game. Maybe that will work and maybe it won't but this topic and your ban at NeoGAF is more than warranted. We're not your little pawns in your shallow and self-indulgent social experiments.
Thank you EviLore.
AstroLad said:This is exactly the sort of statement I disagree with. Ownage has a very specific meaning online--it can mean either someone is defeated by facts, argumentation, or both. If this happens IRL, you don't say "lol you owned me, who cares?"--you acknowledge the loss, and you move on and try to learn from it. In some ways I feel that we don't get as much from the medium as we could because we are so flip about everything, and I think this idea that ownage is some sort of a joke to laugh off is one example I've been seeing a lot recently.
/rant
But that's the topic!? If you want to talk about Miyamoto go to the 'OMG!!!! Miyamoto Creates New Sweeper Simulation Game!" thread...Kestastrophe said:Except no one has their own opinion, thus this thread has degraded to "Dyack pwned, EvilLore is my hero" hivemind bullshit.
Sure, but guaranteed the Insomniac would have ribbed him about in their "5 questions" segment since they hang out here a lot.TheRagnCajun said:oh there will be other podcasts...
Kestastrophe said:Except no one has their own opinion, thus this thread has degraded to "Dyack pwned, EvilLore is my hero, etc." hivemind bullshit.
banning him makes GAF look worse, I would say.
drakesfortune said:You can only be owned if the act of being owned means something to you. I personally don't give a flying turd if someone owns me, which makes me unownable. BTW, it was Dyack who brought ownage into this equation through his crazy for or against posting.
lawblob said:QFT. There is only so much shit EviLore should be expected to put up with from Dyack. The man is completely out-of-line when he calls GAF the "worst" gaming forum. By virtue of GAF's admissions & membership process and TOS, it is probably the best gaming forum in terms of overall quality and breadth of discussion.
Dyack's behavior is totally irresponsible for a man who is supposed to be a corporate CEO. He is becoming a PR nightmare for Microsoft, he is turning potential consumers away from his products, and he is spewing vitriol around the internet like an obnoxious 12 year old.
I cannot believe a gaming executive would turn this petty and obnoxious simply because a group of people choose to discuss his games within a private forum. The man is an idiot.
Flachmatuch said:I'd expect a guy like him to come to a forum to look for intelligent discussion from non-professionals or a more direct contact with people who play his games, and not looking for silly childish fights. If you get into a fight with immature people, you'll always lose.
Calcaneus said:heh......
drakesfortune said:You can only be owned if the act of being owned means something to you. I personally don't give a flying turd if someone owns me, which makes me unownable.
commariodore64 said:MGS4 has EXCELLENT story telling and, more importantly, WELL DIRECTED and ANIMATED cinematics that make the story that much more engaging... he HAS learned nothing from Kojima...
EviLore said:As sad as several of your coworkers sitting in silence on 1up Yours for an hour of one-sided Dyack tripe, too dumbfounded to provide any sort of critical examination of his points? Hopefully not as sad as that, because then I'd be pretty embarrassed.
B-Rad Lascelle said:What happens if it sells really well? Like an Adam Sandler movie?. What then? :lol