ZoukGalaxy
Member
Translation: the game is out unfinished in beta state
Last edited:
Every single outlet seems to be reviewing the PS5 versionSo, how has it gotten all these glowing reviews?
I'll wait weeks until they get the install size below 150gbI guess I'll wait a few weeks after release to consider it then…lol
Two totally different mentalities on release day workmanship.
Following a six-week delay designed to "achieve the level of polish our fans deserve", the Respawn-developed sequel will be released on April 28.
Like how can IGN give it a 9/10 and still put this in their review:The reviews should reflect the bad performance and tired of reviewers docking games for performance issues only when they don't like a game
Throughout it all, Survivor is a gorgeous game with beautifully detailed environments and characters… and perhaps as a result, not one of the best performing. My PS5 playthrough saw some fairly gnarly slowdowns from the expected 30 frames per second in 4K Quality Mode, especially when fighting around smoke or fog, which made timing by parries and dodges difficult. Disappointingly, even the 1440p Performance Mode isn't close to holding a locked 60fps. I also saw a few crashes and bugs that forced me to quit and reload my save to progress (though this was before the day one patch). EA has naturally promised more patches will come with improvements on all platforms, but if history is any guide it might take a little while before it's completely ironed out.
Then ea wouldnt pay ign to run ads anymoreLike how can IGN give it a 9/10 and still put this in their review:
It's the utter inconsistency in their reviews that bug me.Like how can IGN give it a 9/10 and still put this in their review:
Which is also suffering from performance issues. Performance mode is nowhere near 60fps for most of the time and the drops seem to be quite severe in large areas on Koboh.Every single outlet seems to be reviewing the PS5 version
Sad fact, Does anyone remember or heard of the Nintendo Seal of quality? I personally was still a kid then but I can remember it, was started in the 80s.
Nintendo starting that initiative and was a guarantee that the game has been tested and was in pristine condition.
That's not what it was to my understanding... and I found something to back up what I am saying.that's not really what the Seal of Quality was. Nintendo's Seal of Quality literally only meant that the game was tested to not break your system (basically that the PCB didn't short anything), and was licensed using official cartridges.
Nintendo did not test third party games for bugs or quality of the games themselves. you could literally release an NES game that has a gamebreaking bug that deletes your save file once you reach the last level, having sound bugs and constant framrdrops to 4fps, and as long as it was licensed and on an official cartridge it would get the Nintendo Seal of Quality.
Anyone saw this? This is great fanservice
Might wanna get the game but at a later point.
Crazy thing is this game was already delayed.Cannot believe they are tweeting bragging that they will fix a "finished" retail game with patches in the upcoming weeks! What happened to releasing a fucking game complete, fools??? Gaming today fucking sucks sometimes.