WrenchNinja
Member
You can when the owner of said property has failed in keeping control of it, it is chasing after you, and you're afraid it's going to attack you.You think? You cant just go around kicking $2000 property you know.
You can when the owner of said property has failed in keeping control of it, it is chasing after you, and you're afraid it's going to attack you.You think? You cant just go around kicking $2000 property you know.
Why wouldn't they?
You're doing it right now.
So, then - do you think it's a fair and just reaction to kick a pug in the head as a means to keep it away from you while jogging?
It all comes down to state of mind. If he thought the dog was in attack mode and the owner was not in control of the dog, it's justified. If he thought the dog was merely an annoyance and kicked it because it was in his way, it's not justified.
Somewhat on topic - people that take their dogs for walks on paved trails and let their beasts shit everywhere without cleaning it up are scum.
1. We don't know where the dog was kicked.
2. We don't know whether he went out of his way to kick it.
3. We don't know if it was underfoot and he kicked it as part of his stride so he didn't trip.
4. We don't know if he didn't lie on the ground and windmill his legs and underhand lob the dog into his eggbeater tibias.
We don't know.
All this crap about he should go to jail, he is totally justified is fucking nonsense. We don't know enough to say anything other than it is a goddamned shame.
1. We don't know where the dog was kicked.
2. We don't know whether he went out of his way to kick it.
3. We don't know if it was underfoot and he kicked it as part of his stride so he didn't trip.
4. We don't know if he didn't lie on the ground and windmill his legs and underhand lob the dog into his eggbeater tibias.
.
Thanks!
No way this guy goes to jail. Nor do I think he should go to jail.
The guy told the cops he went out of his way to kick the dog. He specifically said he gave it a "tap." It was intentional. It wasn't a matter of the dog being underfoot. So yeah, we do know whether he went out of his way to kick the dog. He admitted to doing so.
The guy told the cops he went out of his way to kick the dog. He specifically said he gave it a "tap." It was intentional. It wasn't a matter of the dog being underfoot. So yeah, we do know whether he went out of his way to kick the dog. He admitted to doing so.
One the dogs ran toward the man, he told police, and he kicked the dog to get away from it.
I also say that from having seen it from the other side of the fence (albeit it was a dog doing the attacking).
One time my sister's mini schnauzer saw someone walking a St. Bernard on the sidewalk and darted out of the house like a bullet.
She charged up to the St. Bernard and got all up in its face. By the time Dad, my sister and I caught up, the St. Bernard had already bitten the little idiot.
It wasn't a very aggressive bite, but it was enough to break skin and cause a little blood. The owner of the St. Bernard was super apologetic, but it wasn't her fault in the least. It was the little schnauzer that thought she could take a dog 10x her size for some reason.
We bandaged her up and all was well, but we couldn't blame the other owner for what happened.
Read it again..
Dogs aren't humans.
The owner's account can't be wholly discounted, though. The news doesn't say "the owner says the dog was kicked in the head," the reporters say the dog was kicked in the head. And if there was a discrepancy regarding the guy's saying he tapped the the dog, that would have been noted as part of the he said/she said narrative that's actually in the article (and the evening news stand-up) itself. But the story takes pains to highlight which parts of the story ARE actually in dispute, and they aren't that the guy "tapped" the dog, or that the dog wasn't kicked in the head. The discrepancies as the Gate reporters noted them are that the pug was running AWAY from the jogger when he kicked it.
The news reporter says that the jogger admitted he was "scared" by the dog, and "only lightly tapped on the dog to get it to go away."
That's the reporter saying that, likely as a result of interviewing the officer himself who decided not to arrest the man due to percieved lack of intent.
You are giving the SF Gate reporters WAY too much credit.
I thought I was pretty clear in my last post, but I'll reiterate.
If the jogger felt that the pug was attacking, then yes, kicking it to keep it away is justifiable under self-defense.
It doesn't matter if it connected in the head or the body. Or if he aimed for the head, or if he aimed for the body and hit the head. Or whatever.
It all comes down to state of mind. If he thought the dog was in attack mode and the owner was not in control of the dog, it's justified. If he thought the dog was merely an annoyance and kicked it because it was in his way, it's not justified.
I am. It's not even the Gate reporters I should be referencing there, but the CBS San Francisico affiliate in the embedded video as part of the story.
Either way, I don't think calling the integrity of the entire newspaper into question over the reporting of this story is going to be all that helpful
Otherwise known as the Zimmerman defence.
BTW, thanks for the lively debate. It's good to have someone who disagrees, but is also willing to defend their points. We may not see eye-to-eye on this, but I respect where you're coming from.
I can't even imagine a grown adult being scared of a pug. What a pathetic specimen this fellow must be.
.
I kind of doubt a human is more likely to run after you and bite you. Maybe if you were in Florida.Exactly. A human is far more likely to harm you.
Do you have stats to back up this claim?Exactly. A human is far more likely to harm you.
Seems like a "he said" "she said" clusterfuck and a poor pug was caught in the middle.
Please folks, put your dogs on a leash unless you're on a park for no leashes.
Otherwise known as the Zimmerman defence.
I'm sorry but "I felt threatened" is not a get out of jail free card.
Just by nature I'm not inclined to take the word of someone walking two dogs without a leash. The real victim of course is the dog, shame it was owned by an idiot.
A pug is no threat to anybody.
Don't kick a fucking pug for being off leash
Fuck you
This is my thought as well. Entitled dog owner meets entitled jogger and the only real victim is the dog.
Otherwise known as the Zimmerman defence.
I'm sorry but "I felt threatened" is not a get out of jail free card.
I thought I was pretty clear in my last post, but I'll reiterate.
If the jogger felt that the pug was attacking, then yes, kicking it to keep it away is justifiable under self-defense.
It doesn't matter if it connected in the head or the body. Or if he aimed for the head, or if he aimed for the body and hit the head. Or whatever.
It all comes down to state of mind. If he thought the dog was in attack mode and the owner was not in control of the dog, it's justified. If he thought the dog was merely an annoyance and kicked it because it was in his way, it's not justified.
Can't predict how living creatures [animals or humans] will react. Look at how this guy reacts just on pure instinct:
Imagine if it wasn't just a prank.
I can't even imagine a grown adult being scared of a pug. What a pathetic specimen this fellow must be.
Probably kills house spiders with a shotgun.
I was bitten by dogs before and still wouldn't kick one. Today, I'd rather kick the owner if something happens.I know how much people on gaf loves dogs more than humans but if dog came running towards me I would kick it to defend myself. After that time when my mom was attacked by angry dogs and was almost killed I don't trust any dog that's not on the leash, no matter how cute they are.
I was bitten by dogs before and still wouldn't kick one. Today, I'd rather kick the owner if something happens.
@topic: Wouldn't have gone well if he'd kick my dog like that. For him I mean. Well, for me as well probably. People need to understand that a human can have strong bonds to his dog and respect that. I love my dog to the same degree like I love any of the members of my family - sometimes even more. And you can be sure that I'd react that same way like if someone kicked my brother.
That said, the jogger was a coward. A pug like that is no danger to anyone. I'm sure he wouldn't have kicked a Doberman running at him....
Good luck convincing a jury that the 10-15 pound dog posed a threat to your life, therefore you had to kill it and then are suing the owner for wrecking you