Yes. They are mad cause he played it wrong. They were being super fucking annoying about it too. Like, you ever watched a movie with someone who's seen it before? And all they do the entire time is tap you on the shoulder and tell you "oh this bit! this bits good!". Imagine that for like 40 hours. There was some hidden ending which involved playing a really really really shitty shootemup section. Like no joke, 10 to 15 minutes of an asteroids like section. And he got fucked off with it after dying multiple times and quit. And people lost their fucking shit. So he went and watched that ending on youtube. And that made people lose their shit even more. Keep in mind, theres like 100 different endings and he'd done like 90 of them by this point. They were being total babies about it. "oh my god! how could you disrespect this total beautiful sequence! you have to play this game the way i want you to!'
I don't think they realise when you tell someone that something awesome is about to happen, it totally detracts from the surprise and uniqueness of it all. It was textbook backseat gaming. There's a bunch of people who are acting like the game is the second coming of Christ. But its objectively an imperfect game and has parts that could rub people the wrong way if it doesnt click. I dont think it clicked for Damiani and some people have taken that as him just blatantly disrespecting 'the game' and by extension themselves.
While I agree with you for the most part, the hyperbole is through the roof here for parts of it, lol. There are 26 endings, but only 5 of them actually matter with the rest of them being short joke endings for the most part that you have to go out of your way to achieve. He only did the 5 main ones and a couple joke endings. Yeah, people got mad that he quit, but he kinda did it at the worst possible point, and watched the ending on youtube despite chat's protests. He was literally right at the end, and just hard quit. It's a bizarre thing to do when you're streaming a playthrough of a game. Backseat gaming aside, imagine any ally (or any streamer, really.) doing that for any other game, sink a bunch of time into a playthrough, and don't see it through right at the very end. I don't watch these kinds of streams as I'd rather play the game being streamed most of the time, but I can understand why someone who stuck with the streams from beginning to end (or the majority of it) would be upset. That said, he's not under any obligation to finish it (technically he did, in an amusing Damiani troll manner which is not everyone's cup of tea), but it's poor showmanship.
I think EZA can learn from this and probably not stream story-heavy games if it's someone's first time because it just leaves the door open for chat to basically ruin it even if they are trying to be "helpful". Perhaps that's too restrictive, maybe consult with another member first if it's a good idea to stream it? I don't know, it depends on the game so it's hard to set a reasonable rule for this. Ultimately, it depends on if EZA even sees it as an issue in the first place. I don't watch many of these full playthroughs so I apologize if it's something that has been addressed already.
Should someone pretend interest in something? Unless he went out of his way to not engage with the game, i dont understand why not engaging with a story thats not grabbing you "disrespwcrful".
And if he quit during this sequence, he must not have found it all that great in the first place, so why stick with it? So that the fans could get some false sense of validation?
Hell no to the bolded, but I found it surprising that he stuck with it for so long because it seemed like he was frustrated or down on the game for the short time I watched him. It's hard to tell with him sometimes though because he often has a stern/focused look while playing. There were several moments of justified frustration throughout with the PC version crashing several times costing him progress as this game doesn't auto-save for the purposes of story-related context. Some of it though, could be considered self-inflicted as there were boss fights in which he was doing minimal damage due to some hardcore critical pathing. At one point he was sitting on 500k worth of sellable items that is more than enough for almost everything in the game. He could've used it to buy recovery items, upgrades, etc. I tuned in late game and was surprised to see him still rocking a level 1 weapon (even though he had other stronger weapons) which is bonkers to me. It's like playing Persona and barely fusing personas or leveling any social links. At that point, I broke my own personal rule and engaged in some filthy backseat gaming for a bit which I regret doing. Despite that, I refuse to say Damiani was "playing it wrong" but he certainly didn't make it easy for himself, and it didn't make for a very fun stream to watch due to his frustration. I tuned out and watched the Ending E fiasco later on youtube and then checked twitch to see the chat replay for the expected reactions.
Alright, I tried, I really did.
This thread is just constant complaining about the dumbest shit. I thought it would be a nice place to talk to other EZA members but all you guys do is talk about what EZA should do and isn't doing or what they are doing wrong or you turn into their personal accountants in regards to their Patreon.
See you all in other threads, unsubbed.
Sad to see this, and I hope what I wrote above doesn't come off as whiny or entitled. The intent was to share my observations and offer an alternative perspective to the whole NieR thing. I think some people are better off posting their suggestions and criticisms for EZA as a whole in the Cup of Jones patreon posts than here, unless it's specific to some of the Allies that are active in this thread. I would think Brandon's comments in the Cup of Jones videos about "more criticism, please" are meant to be directed to the patreon posts, and not this thread.