• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ELI MANNING OWNS TIKI BARBER, THE AFC, THE ENTIRE LEAGUE, AND THE UNIVERSE!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cloudy

Banned
bionic77 said:
Amazing that Moss was really a non factor throughout the playoffs.

Welker was really the guy who was doing it on NE's offense.

Welker was getting off cos teams were so focused on Moss, dude. I guarantee Brady won't sniff even 40 TDs next year if they don't keep Randy..
 

methodman

Banned
Cloudy said:
Welker was getting off cos teams were so focused on Moss, dude. I guarantee Brady won't sniff even 40 TDs next year if they don't keep Randy..

I hate when coaches do that shit.

They actually believed that keeping Moss in there as a Decoy was a good idea.

"Hey guys, let's have Moss run deep routes and throw it underneath to Welker, that will help us win!"

...No it fucking won't. What took you to this game? Throwing underneath to Welker for 100+ yards or over the top to Moss? God damn, why do coaches do this shit? Same thing happened with L.T. last year, San Diego came out in the 2nd half against the Patriots just using him as a Decoy and ended up losing the fucking game.

Give the fucking ball to Moss dammit. End around, screen, ANYTHING. I didn't see any of that. Just plain bad coaching, IMO.

This shit happens against the Warriors too, and it's a reason we always lose to the Spurs (except this year 2-0 baby!). Other teams try and play us like they feel they can use a certain player as a decoy instead of using him like he should actually is used.
 

bionic77

Member
FrenchMovieTheme said:
the montana pass to john taylor against cincy is the greatest superbowl play ever! yes i'm biased :(

the tyree play was incredible though. it has to go down as top 5 at least (i still think the final play "1 yard short" in the rams/titans game was incredible)
The best plays in the playoffs usually don't happen in the SB.

You will be happy to know that my favorite all time playoff moment (including the SB) is Montana to Clark. Definitely one of the greatest plays of all time and the fact that it was to win the game (against the Cowboys no less) makes it all the more amazing.

Cool Joe still the best qb of all time IMHO.
 

btrboyev

Member
I've never been so happy in my life, I lost my voice, and fucking ended up punching the damn ceiling I jumped so high after that catch and I fucked up my hand.

what a game.
 

el Diablo

Banned
Gigglepoo said:
Has anyone else compared this to the Miracle on Ice yet? Massive underdogs defeat the Evil Empire. USA! USA!

Lol great game, absolutely loved watching the Patriots eat some real humble pie but let's be real here this wasn't even close to the Miracle on Ice. The closest we'll ever see to that kind of upset would be if a 16 seed beat an undefeated 1 seed in the NCAA mens basketball final and even then it wouldn't top it. You'll never see it in the Olympics again since professional athletes can compete now.
 

CB3

intangibles, motherfucker
nothing can top the miracle on ice because of the underlying political issues with the Russians.
 
Any1 know a reliable sight where you can buy custom t-shirts? Gonna go into mass production of

"2007 New England Patriots"

18-1

(in orange and teal)

Grats New Yorkers, from here on out in all neutral games concerning the fins i shall root for the giants for life.
 

Karakand

Member
CB3 said:
nothing can top the miracle on ice because of the underlying political issues with the Russians.
And the general socio-political and economic malaise in the country at the time (gg Carter).

That's one of the very few events I wish I could have seen live and been able to appreciate (i.e. above the age of 4).
 

SickBoy

Member
btrboyev said:
I've never been so happy in my life, I lost my voice, and fucking ended up punching the damn ceiling I jumped so high after that catch and I fucked up my hand.

what a game.

Heh, I got bloodied knuckles thanks to wide-open Plax.
 
btrboyev said:
I've never been so happy in my life, I lost my voice, and fucking ended up punching the damn ceiling I jumped so high after that catch and I fucked up my hand.

what a game.

holy shit i did the same thing except i punched some weird wood sign hanging from the ceiling at the bar :O
 

Karakand

Member
SickBoy said:
Heh, I got bloodied knuckles thanks to wide-open Plax.
Yeah I really hate having low ceilings covered in popcorn. You'd think building codes would be sports fan friendly in this day and age!
 

Bogus

Member
Karakand said:
And the general socio-political and economic malaise in the country at the time (gg Carter).

That's one of the very few events I wish I could have seen live and been able to appreciate (i.e. above the age of 4).

Definitely. The Miracle on Ice was an event whose importance transcended Hockey. I can think of very few sporting events that had close to the same impact.

As fun as it was to watch, and as gratifying I'm sure the outcome was to Giants fans and creepy Pats-haters alike, Super Bowl 42 certainly isn't going to be one of them.
 
Bogus said:
Definitely. The Miracle on Ice was an event whose importance transcended Hockey. I can think of very few sporting events that had close to the same impact.

As fun as it was to watch, and as gratifying I'm sure the outcome was to Giants fans and creepy Pats-haters alike, Super Bowl 42 certainly isn't going to be one of them.

Dolphins fans aren't creepy pat haters, sir.
 

Bogus

Member
Heh, I didn't mean all Pats haters. Just the really over-the-top, irrational, vitriolic ones who I seem to be surrounded by at work. Their obsession with pointing out deficiencies in the Pats since they won in '01 is seriously creepy.
 

jman2050

Member
Yeah Miracle on Ice still > *. This game would be more on the level of the 2004 ALCS or the App State game. Throw in Texas/USC if you're generous.

This is almost definitely the biggest upset in NFL history though.
 

woodchuck

Member
i think jets/colts will forever be the greatest upset in nfl history but i think this had to have had the greatest play

and texas/usc was only an upset in retarded people's eyes like skip bayless
 

TheDuce22

Banned
Most Dolphins fans here werent alive when they did their thing. What the hell are you gloating about? I thought Cowboys fans were bad...
 
I don't know, here in SoCal (west coast in general I guess) that Texas/USC felt like one of the biggest upsets ever. Mind you I am not a USC fan. I mean the house I was at watching the game at was in total shock, hehe.
 

CB3

intangibles, motherfucker
it was a shock. it felt like it was USC Vs. Vince Young. 11 on 1 and our D still couldnt stop him. that shit was heartbreaking
 
"First the BoSox won it, then Boston College will, then the Patriots, and then the Celtics. Man, it's great to be a New England fan right now."

-any random Boston area fan
 
Anyone else think that Belichick's challenge (12 men on the field after the Giants' defense shut the Pats' drive down) was the most classless thing a coach has done in a game in awhile?

It was just so dishonorable. Would he have felt proud, if his team had scored on that drive after winning the challenge? Would he have felt proud knowing that his offense got shut down and the only reason they didn't punt was a stupid penalty that you would only notice by looking at a replay?

But hey, anything to win, right?
 

laserbeam

Banned
NomarTyme said:
My personal upset was Ram/Pats. Seriously my heart was empty that day and I felt like barfing but I couldn't.

That loss sucks even more with all the details about the day before super bowl camera crap. Patriots deserve to lose all their recent Super Bowl Wins with all this going on.

Green Shinobi said:
Anyone else think that Belichick's challenge (12 men on the field after the Giants' defense shut the Pats' drive down) was the most classless thing a coach has done in a game in awhile?

It was just so dishonorable. Would he have felt proud, if his team had scored on that drive after winning the challenge? Would he have felt proud knowing that his offense got shut down and the only reason they didn't punt was a stupid penalty that you would only notice by looking at a replay?

But hey, anything to win, right?

That Whole situation was crap. They Punted the ball and the Giants were about to start thier drive then they decide to challenge. Moment you do your next play the chance to issue a Challenge should be gone.
 

mCACGj

Member
Green Shinobi said:
Anyone else think that Belichick's challenge (12 men on the field after the Giants' defense shut the Pats' drive down) was the most classless thing a coach has done in a game in awhile?

It was just so dishonorable. Would he have felt proud, if his team had scored on that drive after winning the challenge? Would he have felt proud knowing that his offense got shut down and the only reason they didn't punt was a stupid penalty that you would only notice by looking at a replay?

But hey, anything to win, right?

If it's not against the rules to challenge the penalty, what's the problem with the challenge? It's an objective ruling that the refs missed that was quite obvious.

EDIT: Defensive 12-man on the field penalty is not a pre-snap penalty, so that play's snap is still that play.
 
What a game, it started slow but it ended as one of the best SB's of all time. I am still in shock, even though I went for the Giants I never once thought they could pull it off. They were the better team on the field, as usual a dominant defense will beat a dominant offense and the Giants d was incredible. They ate the O-line of the Pats, and they got to Brady, I know its easier said than done but that is the key, take down Brady you take down the offense. Credit to the Pats D cause for the most part they played well, they held the Giants to 17, that should have been enough, but they couldn't hold on. Eli, wow, that play, OMG. The whole game the Giants just played a little bit better. Congrats to them.

I really feel that week 17 was the turning point of this whole season. The Giants were a different team since that game, confident, player better than ever. The Pats were not the same team in the playoffs, their offense was off. I have this weird feeling that if the Pats would have just sat down their players week 17 not play their hardest in that game that maybe they win the SB. Maybe the Giants don't game all that confidence, maybe the Giants dont know what to expect from the Pats. But the Pats gunned for perfection and it bit them in the ass. If the Pats cant go undefeated I dont know how anyone will. Say what you will of the 72 Dolphins what they did was special. I don't even think they are the best team of all time, but you have to respect them for what they did, this just proves how hard it is to go undefeated.
 
Green Shinobi said:
Anyone else think that Belichick's challenge (12 men on the field after the Giants' defense shut the Pats' drive down) was the most classless thing a coach has done in a game in awhile?

It was just so dishonorable. Would he have felt proud, if his team had scored on that drive after winning the challenge? Would he have felt proud knowing that his offense got shut down and the only reason they didn't punt was a stupid penalty that you would only notice by looking at a replay?

But hey, anything to win, right?

Joke post???

Dishonorable for winning a challange that CLEARLY showed the other team was in violation of an NFL rule. What in the hell dude. If that was your team you would be pissed if they did not challenge that.
 

Bogus

Member
Green Shinobi said:
Anyone else think that Belichick's challenge (12 men on the field after the Giants' defense shut the Pats' drive down) was the most classless thing a coach has done in a game in awhile?

It was just so dishonorable. Would he have felt proud, if his team had scored on that drive after winning the challenge? Would he have felt proud knowing that his offense got shut down and the only reason they didn't punt was a stupid penalty that you would only notice by looking at a replay?

But hey, anything to win, right?

The rule is black and white. Belichick saw that the Giants had made a mistake, and he knew that his team would get the first down if he challenged it.

You can make cases for legitimate "dishonorable" moves by Belichick, but this wasn't one of them. Let's not grasp at straws.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Cloudy said:
Welker was getting off cos teams were so focused on Moss, dude. I guarantee Brady won't sniff even 40 TDs next year if they don't keep Randy..

You make it seem like that's a bad thing. The Patriots became obstinate this season - refusing to run even when their passing attack was floundering because they had all these stars and great stats. If they played a conventional NFL offense they would have been a better team this year.
 
Gigglepoo said:
You make it seem like that's a bad thing. The Patriots became obstinate this season - refusing to run even when their passing attack was floundering because they had all these stars and great stats. If they played a conventional NFL offense they would have been a better team this year.

I agree. The Pats looked more like the Colt teams that never won the SB than the Pats of old. The Colt team that won last year played more like the Pats did back when they were winning. Balance is key, but to be fair the Giants D didn't allow them to do much of anything.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Why did Brady throw the ball 40+ times when the Patriots were up most of the game? And are people still laughing at my prediction that Moss won't be back next season? Troy Brown was infinitely more valuable in their Super Bowl runs than Randy Moss this year. You don't need stats to win, you need a solid team.
 
mCACGj said:
If it's not against the rules to challenge the penalty, what's the problem with the challenge? It's an objective ruling that the refs missed that was quite obvious.

EDIT: Defensive 12-man on the field penalty is not a pre-snap penalty, so that play's snap is still that play.


MiamiWesker said:
Joke post???

Dishonorable for winning a challange that CLEARLY showed the other team was in violation of an NFL rule. What in the hell dude. If that was your team you would be pissed if they did not challenge that.
The problem is that their drive had been shut down, but was kept alive by a ticky-tack penalty that had nothing to do with the play. Would you really want the entire NFL championship to be decided by a lineman taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field?

It was 4th and 5. The Giants' defense had shut them down. They didn't earn that first down. You can bet your ass that if they had scored on that drive and that had been the difference in the game, you'd see people calling for a rule change so that you can't get a first down due to a 12 men on the field penalty.

The way it should happen is that the play moves up 5 yards, but it's still 4th and 5, or at least 4th and 1. An entire defensive stand shouldn't be negated by one guy taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field.
 
Green Shinobi said:
The problem is that their drive had been shut down, but was kept alive by a ticky-tack penalty that had nothing to do with the play. Would you really want the entire NFL championship to be decided by a lineman taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field?

It was 4th and 5. The Giants' defense had shut them down. They didn't earn that first down. You can bet your ass that if they had scored on that drive and that had been the difference in the game, you'd see people calling for a rule change so that you can't get a first down due to a 12 men on the field penalty.

The way it should happen is that the play moves up 5 yards, but it's still 4th and 5. An entire defensive stand shouldn't be negated by one guy taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field.

Its the rules, its been there since forever. Have your guys off the field or its the offenses right to snap the ball when you are not ready. It is a stupid reason to make a first down but its simple, don't have 12 men on the field, I put all the blame on the Giants for not being organized. Ask yourself this, if it wasn't the Pats doing it would you care.
 
MiamiWesker said:
Its the rules, its been there since forever. Have your guys off the field or its the offenses right to snap the ball when you are not ready. It is a stupid reason to make a first down but its simple, don't have 12 men on the field, I put all the blame on the Giants for not being organized. Ask yourself this, if it wasn't the Pats doing it would you care.
If the difference in a championship game was a score after a drive that had been kept alive by a penalty like that, I would definitely care.

They really need to amend the rules so that minor penalties cannot result in a first down.
 

Bogus

Member
Green Shinobi said:
The problem is that their drive had been shut down, but was kept alive by a ticky-tack penalty that had nothing to do with the play. Would you really want the entire NFL championship to be decided by a lineman taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field?

It was 4th and 5. The Giants' defense had shut them down. They didn't earn that first down. You can bet your ass that if they had scored on that drive and that had been the difference in the game, you'd see people calling for a rule change so that you can't get a first down due to a 12 men on the field penalty.

The way it should happen is that the play moves up 5 yards, but it's still 4th and 5, or at least 4th and 1. An entire defensive stand shouldn't be negated by one guy taking a quarter of a second too long to get off the field.

Your disagreement with the validity of the rule doesn't affect how "honorable" Belichick's challenge was. The concept of honor in professional sports is entirely nebulous and subjective. The fact of the matter is that any coach worth his salt would have recognized the opportunity and taken advantage of it.

It's a penalty like any other, and it can change the outcome of a game just like any other. Would you have such a problem if, for example, there was pass interference on a fourth down conversion attempt that resulted in a first down?
 

SickBoy

Member
Green Shinobi is on an island on this one, I think. I don't believe there's "no honor" in pro sports (see my posts earlier this year about running up the score), and I didn't have any problem with the challenge either... it's what you do...

At any rate, it wound up better for the Giants in the end, because that drive wound up as the 4th-down gamble drive, and they got better field position after the Pats failed to convert.
 
Bogus said:
Your disagreement with the validity of the rule doesn't affect how "honorable" Belichick's challenge was. The concept of honor in professional sports is entirely nebulous and subjective. The fact of the matter is that any coach worth his salt would have recognized the opportunity and taken advantage of it.

It's a penalty like any other, and it can change the outcome of a game just like any other. Would you have such a problem if, for example, there was pass interference on a fourth down conversion attempt that resulted in a first down?
No, because penalties like pass interference, holding, facemask, etc have an effect on the play at hand. Penalties like false start or offsides are fuck-ups committed by the players directly involved in the play, and in many cases, are planned for by the opposing side (long counts before the snap).

12 men on the field has nothing to do with the play at all. Furthermore, the refs initially decided not to call it.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Green Shinobi said:
They really need to amend the rules so that minor penalties cannot result in a first down.

I strongly disagree. Teams should be punished for breaking the rules.

Green Shinobi said:
12 men on the field has nothing to do with the play at all.

You don't think an extra man is an advantage? Or do you think some 12 men on the field penalties should be called and others should not? How do you feel about holds that take place far from the ball?
 
Gigglepoo said:
I strongly disagree. Teams should be punished for breaking the rules.



You don't think an extra man is an advantage? Or do you think some 12 men on the field penalties should be called and others should not? How do you feel about holds that take place far from the ball?
An extra man who is a fraction of a second away from reaching the sideline is not an advantage to anyone.
 
Green Shinobi said:
If the difference in a championship game was a score after a drive that had been kept alive by a penalty like that, I would definitely care.

They really need to amend the rules so that minor penalties cannot result in a first down.
just be happy there isnt the college rule that if the kicker is touched kicking team gets an automatic first down. Now thats bullshit
 
Suburban Cowboy said:
...the dolphins didnt win you know

But history did, muahahahaha! :p

The Giants played incredible, you guys deserve all the credit. Know this, that the second most happiest group of people in the nation right now all live in Miami. For once NY and Miami are cheering together.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Green Shinobi said:
An extra man who is a fraction of a second away from reaching the sideline is not an advantage to anyone.

So you think some penalties should be called and some should not. Ok... where do you draw the line?
 
Gigglepoo said:
So you think some penalties should be called and some should not. Ok... where do you draw the line?
I'd say when it's the difference between 4th and 5 or a 1st down, that's a good time not to call the penalty. I just don't think the game should be decided by that shit.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Green Shinobi said:
I'd say when it's the difference between 4th and 5 or a 1st down, that's a good time not to call the penalty. I just don't think the game should be decided by that shit.

But doesn't this game, your specific example, prove that a game cannot be decided by one stupid penalty?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom