There was a rumour going around after 'Lightyear' flopped that they were going to back peddle on this agenda drivel, i guess not though if this pos devils handbook is recent.At what point does your business stop being about making money and about doing whatever the fuck this is?
What’s the endgame? Flop after flop at the box office and they’re mandating 50% of background characters have to be “underrepresented”.
That is such bullshit that they're going to backpedal. I've heard that too but then you have this new feminist Star Wars shit coming out and you can tell it's all just PR. They're going to continue their agenda driven bullshit regardless.There was a rumour going around after 'Lightyear' flopped that they were going to back peddle on this agenda drivel, i guess not though if this pos devils handbook is recent.
Go get them Musk!.
Well the rumour was (from supposed insiders) that they were going to backpedal, although how much wasnt certain, but it could take potentially years as they had so much tv and movies already in production and pre production.That is such bullshit that they're going to backpedal. I've heard that too but then you have this new feminist Star Wars shit coming out and you can tell it's all just PR. They're going to continue their agenda driven bullshit regardless.
Do it, Elon!This would be hilarious
Based Musk if true.
Also....
The Nov 2024 US election results will have some sway in how fast they segue away from JEDI bullshit. Seriously, watch out for the leftists to start calling it Justice Equity Diversity and Inclusion. They've already talked about it. There's no place for this.Well the rumour was (from supposed insiders) that they were going to backpedal, although how much wasnt certain, but it could take potentially years as they had so much tv and movies already in production and pre production.
So i suppose it could happen but again obviously not if this handbook is recent.
I suppose if all their films and tv keeps flopping, they may have no choice.
This trend should concern everyone. Diversity hires are a quick way to torpedo a company's success (meritocracy being the desirable alternative). And, it's flagrant discrimination. Pretty easy to strike down in the courts. Grab some popcorn.
Yup! It’s Gina and Elon vs Disney
Gina Carano Sues Disney Over 'Mandalorian' Firing on Elon Musk Funding
Gina Carano is suing Disney over her firing from 'The Mandalorian' -- claiming she was punished for not toeing the political party line ... and Elon Musk's backing her.www.tmz.com
A lot of people already are. Disney is the poster child of wokism, and no company is being hit as hard as them financially with Disney+ on its last legs, and the majority of their films and tv flopping. In fact its only Marvel that is still bringing in decent numbers but even thats been hit hard from its mega bucks hey day of a few years ago.Vote with your wallet and stop watching their shit!!!!!!
Forced diversity hiring is what has been tried lately, and put bluntly, it's exacerbated a lack of tolerance from the opposition. The more something is forced, the greater the resistance it will encounter.We had decades of "meritocracy" after the fall of Jim Crow and a constant rise of black and brown collegiate graduates yet no rise in the ranks of Hollywood or other industries in hiring of said black and brown graduates...
At some point it has to be recognized that "meritocracy" isn't something that's been achieved yet. There's exceptions but it isn't the rule yet. Maybe when blind casting/hiring (no names, no pictures) is a thing ... Just credentials... But until then, it isn't.
Oh come on its not like Elon has ever hid his feelings on wokism in the past, its the reason why so many sjw's hate him.This comes off as performative BS... He may be suing a long with Carano... But what's his stake in it? Sure Gina has a legit qualm with Disney and Chapek and ... I forgot her name ... But what's Elon's angle?
He just seems to be continuing his edge-lord, faux conservative, agenda driven distraction... He's failing at X so onto a distraction to drum up anger/controversy ... And folks are falling for it hook, line and sinker.
He already told that disney CEO to f himself. Might as well go all inThis comes off as performative BS... He may be suing a long with Carano... But what's his stake in it? Sure Gina has a legit qualm with Disney and Chapek and ... I forgot her name ... But what's Elon's angle?
He just seems to be continuing his edge-lord, faux conservative, agenda driven distraction... He's failing at X so onto a distraction to drum up anger/controversy ... And folks are falling for it hook, line and sinker.
I kind of agree with all your points... Let me start with the TV examples you gave with A Different World and C+C Music Factory:Forced affirmative action and diversity hiring is what has been tried lately, and put bluntly, it's led to the rise of Trump and the far right's lack of tolerance. The more something is forced, the greater the resistance it will encounter.
The intentions behind DE&I also lead to tokenism, where superficial efforts to include a diverse set of individuals do not address deeper systemic issues or improve organizational culture. DEI programs foster divisions within teams by emphasizing differences rather than common goals and shared values. Remember how nice the early 1990s were, with shows like A Different World or In Living Color, or music like C&C Music Factory? This was a successful attempt at cultural integration. During that era, younger generations were taught to see beyond color and to learn from each other's stories. This worked.
Back to why DE&I is flawed, the lack of clear metrics for success and the potential for these initiatives to be used as public relations tools rather than substantive change efforts raises questions about its successful impact as an agent for positive societal change. Some research suggests that mandatory diversity training programs, a common DEI strategy, can provoke resistance (mildshock.gif) and have little to no positive effect on workforce inclusion and may even reinforce biases. While the goals of DEI are crucial for creating fair and inclusive workplaces, the current approaches often fall far, far short of achieving meaningful change, suggesting a need for more effective, evidence-based strategies that go beyond surface-level solutions that DE&I proponents prophetize.
Meritocracy is advocated for its focus on individual achievement and talent as the primary basis for recognition and advancement, ensuring that positions are filled by those most qualified, regardless of their background. This approach promotes efficiency and innovation within organizations by prioritizing skills, performance, and contributions to organizational goals above all else.
Oh come on its not like Elon has ever hid his feelings on wokism in the past, its the reason why so many sjw's hate him.
If i were him i'd be paying Carano's legal fees, while also hiring the best lawyers on the planet.
He already told that disney CEO to f himself. Might as well go all in
We had decades of "meritocracy" after the fall of Jim Crow and a constant rise of black and brown collegiate graduates yet no rise in the ranks of Hollywood or other industries in hiring of said black and brown graduates...
At some point it has to be recognized that "meritocracy" isn't something that's been achieved yet. There's exceptions but it isn't the rule yet. Maybe when blind casting/hiring (no names, no pictures) is a thing ... Just credentials... But until then, it isn't.
Didn't the New York Philharmonic end their blind auditions because it became too Asian and the music too beautiful?
According to the cursory Google I just did, it had nothing to do with Asians but that the symphonies didn't have more black and Latino representation.
The way you worded that plays into the "Model Minority myth" of Asian Americans.
The process was still what you were talking about though, even more. No background at all, totally blind, just the music. It helped women gain significantly. It still had to be attacked though because it didn't achieve the diversity results wanted.
This, however, didn’t work everywhere. In Nigeria, there were less than 14% of women performing in orchestras, so they followed the LA Symphony’s lead by conducting blind auditions as well. Even though each musician was behind a screen, once the maestro heard the clicking of heels, the gender bias returned. Barefoot auditions were then introduced, and we saw the number of women hired increase to 45%.
According to the cursory Google I just did, it had nothing to do with Asians but that the symphonies didn't have more black and Latino representation.
The way you worded that plays into the "Model Minority myth" of Asian Americans.
Did the article tell you which group became "oVeRePrEsEnTeD" or did they hide that information from the reader?
Do it, Elon!