DragoonKain
Neighbours from Hell
News just breaking.
Looks like Twitter will stay an echo chamber forever then
As opposed to him turning it into the opposite echo chamber?
I'm sure he thought this through with his layers, but still this is a very risk bet he is taking.Twitter is going to try to force him to buy it in the courts saying his claims of breach of agreement are unjustified. We'll see how it all shakes out.
They want him to buy it, because he paid a high price for it, and this will destroy its value.
Unless he's using this as a ploy to renegotiate its value down to significantly less.
Lawsuits tend to take a while. What are the chances that part of this is being done with the hope that the market recovers a bit before he's forced to buy it? That itself seems like a dangerous gamble, though. Would taking a billion dollar loss and getting nothing in return really be the better deal for Elon at this time? And if so, what does that say to anyone who would think about investing in Twitter?Twitter is going to try to force him to buy it in the courts saying his claims of breach of agreement are unjustified. We'll see how it all shakes out.
They want him to buy it, because he paid a high price for it, and this will destroy its value.
Unless he's using this as a ploy to renegotiate its value down to significantly less.
Don't be intentionally obtuse.As opposed to him turning it into the opposite echo chamber?
Maybe he will after the stock crashes hard from this move.He was never going to buy it.
Going to be a fun court case
If that was a real concern, they would have come to the negotiation table imo but let's wait and see.Discovery is going to be fun. Twitter will be forced to reveal the real bot numbers and how they’ve been lying to advertisers about their real user count. Fuck Twitter. Burn in hell shitheads.
How have the Twitter alternatives promising free speech worked out…oh right, they’re just ideologically aligned with whomever started them too.Don't be intentionally obtuse.
Do we honestly think that Musk would have started banning a bunch of liberal accounts? Letting conservative viewpoints be expressed is the opposite of an echo chamber.As opposed to him turning it into the opposite echo chamber?
As opposed the cesspool it is now? Oh no, challenging opinions to the narratives, comrade... RUN!!!How have the Twitter alternatives promising free speech worked out…oh right, they’re just ideologically aligned with whomever started them too.
I’m not saying Elon would do this to Twitter if he owned it but the track record of the competition touting “free speech” hasn’t been too great.
What's that saying? Oh yes.Do we honestly think that Musk would have started banning a bunch of liberal accounts? Letting conservative viewpoints be expressed is the opposite of an echo chamber.
Also exposed all the foreign rogue state investments into narrative meddling, etc, etc..At least his bluff served to show that or Twitter don't know his numbers or they inflate their user base and don't even care.
Twitter's gonna get ripped a new one in court, holy shit. Imagine trying to buy a corporation for 40 billion and the corporation refuses to give all the data beforehand.As noted, under various terms of the merger agreement, Twitter is required to provide data and information that Mr. Musk requests in connection with the consummation of the transaction.
Twitter’s obligations to provide Mr. Musk with information is not, as the company’s June 1 letter suggests, limited to a “very specific purpose: facilitating the closing of the transaction.”
To the contrary, Mr. Musk is entitled to seek, and Twitter is obligated to provide, information and data for, inter alia, “any reasonable business purpose related to the consummation of the transaction” (Section 6.4). Twitter must also provide reasonable cooperation in connection with Mr. Musk’s efforts to secure the debt financing necessary to consummate the transaction, including by providing information “reasonably requested” by Mr. Musk (Section 6.11).
Mr. Musk’s requests for user data not only satisfies both criteria, but also meets even Twitter’s narrowed interpretation of the merger agreement, as this information is necessary to facilitate the closing of the transaction.
[......]
Based on Twitter’s behavior to date, and the company’s latest correspondence in particular, Mr. Musk believes the company is actively resisting and thwarting his information rights (and the company’s corresponding obligations) under the merger agreement. This is a clear material breach of Twitter’s obligations under the merger agreement and Mr. Musk reserves all rights resulting therefrom, including his right not to consummate the transaction and his right to terminate the merger agreement.
The downside of this deal falling through is the end of liberal tears that were flowing from Twitter employees who were upset that their safe spaces would be intruded upon and that they would have to leave their house and go to work again.Twitter's gonna get ripped a new one in court, holy shit. Imagine trying to buy a corporation for 40 billion and the corporation refuses to give all the data beforehand.
Yep. This might just kill the bird. Buckle in boys.As noted, under various terms of the merger agreement, Twitter is required to provide data and information that Mr. Musk requests in connection with the consummation of the transaction.
Twitter’s obligations to provide Mr. Musk with information is not, as the company’s June 1 letter suggests, limited to a “very specific purpose: facilitating the closing of the transaction.”
To the contrary, Mr. Musk is entitled to seek, and Twitter is obligated to provide, information and data for, inter alia, “any reasonable business purpose related to the consummation of the transaction” (Section 6.4). Twitter must also provide reasonable cooperation in connection with Mr. Musk’s efforts to secure the debt financing necessary to consummate the transaction, including by providing information “reasonably requested” by Mr. Musk (Section 6.11).
Mr. Musk’s requests for user data not only satisfies both criteria, but also meets even Twitter’s narrowed interpretation of the merger agreement, as this information is necessary to facilitate the closing of the transaction.
[......]
Based on Twitter’s behavior to date, and the company’s latest correspondence in particular, Mr. Musk believes the company is actively resisting and thwarting his information rights (and the company’s corresponding obligations) under the merger agreement. This is a clear material breach of Twitter’s obligations under the merger agreement and Mr. Musk reserves all rights resulting therefrom, including his right not to consummate the transaction and his right to terminate the merger agreement.
Even better are all the Lefties who fled Twitter for a Mastodon server run by a hacker who is going to have fun with their info.The downside of this deal falling through is the end of liberal tears that were flowing from Twitter employees who were upset that their safe spaces would be intruded upon and that they would have to leave their house and go to work again.
For some reason I don't think so. I think this be settled out of court, and part of me thinks this is how Twitter saw it play out from the startTwitter's gonna get ripped a new one in court, holy shit.
Discovery will be fun. Wonder if it's gonna be sealed.Elon Musk wasn't happy with the way Twitter analyzed their own fake account numbers, probably a lot more bots on that website than we think, and Twitter was lying about it. Gonna be interesting to see.