Also true. But how do you educate an audience to look beyond your AAA bloat fest inspired by Marvel cinema?People really think gaming is some kind of charity, huh?
It doesn't matter if a game is decent/good, if it doesn't sell, this is what happens.
At some point people need to take a look at the consumers and not the companies.
Thing is in "normal" times a single bad game shouldn't kill a Studio. Shit happens and frankly if management was on point they should have realized that a particular game may or may not hit for the most part.Game completely bombed commercially, so this is not that surprising. Sad though, since the game is good but got a raw deal in reviews.
I agree. But we do not know how (un)successful their previous games were. It is also possible they tried to shop the studio around, finding no takers. When you are a company that is desperately trying to get out of debt and you fund a game for (just my guess) 40 million and it only makes 10 million back, you are not going to be enthused to spend another 40 million on another game hoping that this time it will work out and make 100 million back to cover both losses...especially when reviews were lukewarm too.Thing is in "normal" times a single bad game shouldn't kill a Studio. Shit happens and frankly if management was on point they should have realized that a particular game may or may not hit for the most part.
Now a single game will tank the studio. Which is f-d up.
*Crowd cheersHope people go easy on Embracer, after all there just trying to run a bussiness.
Yea, I blame the gaming community just as much as I do gaming execs. What a damn shame, Pieces deserved better from the community, AITD is a solid title but people want to let YouTubers and Metacritic dictate which games are worth playing.People really think gaming is some kind of charity, huh?
It doesn't matter if a game is decent/good, if it doesn't sell, this is what happens.
At some point people need to take a look at the consumers and not the companies.
Some people have been conditioned to graphic whoring and will just evaluate games on that. Any game announcement comes with shitposts of "what's with the PS2 graphics". It's a dumbification of the audience and the medium. Glossy graphics over interesting concepts and games. Bit like Hollywood and their blockbusters. It's quickly getting worse.Yea, I blame the gaming community just as much as I do gaming execs. What a damn shame, Pieces deserved better from the community, AITD is a solid title but people want to let YouTubers and Metacritic dictate which games are worth playing.
If/When AITD goes to PS+, we're going to have a lot of people really upset that Pieces was shut down.
Edit: Appeal is getting shut down for sure. The devs of the new Outcast. Outcast was more buggy at launch than AITD and scored lower. Like AITD, the issues have been patched and Outcast: A New Beginning is damn fun but it's also $70. Lots of people would love these games but gamers at large can't help themselves with the insane production values they expect out of every studio.
The future of gaming really is bleak as F.
Check the OP. Everyone was loving it despite its flaws.I didnt see anyone talking about this game until now, so that seems to be one sign. Another is they went with movie actors, not a real need for that is there?
Then I havent really seem them (the studio) do a whole lot. I could be wrong but I can see why this was closed.
Well said.I did my part. I pre-ordered Alone In The Dark (2024) for $60 and I platinumed it. It was a fantastic game.
The sad thing was that I knew before launch that it would price drop quickly. But I paid the full MSRP because I was voting with my wallet that I want these types of games to continue existing.
Alas, it was in vain. Game is still sitting proudly on my shelf. I thoroughly enjoyed all of my time with it and am super bummed that Pieces Interactive has been denied the opportunity to work on sequels. I guess in the end, it was this fine studio that was left alone in the dark
Wish I had the funds to do the same. I live below the poverty line and save up fo buy games.Well said.
I bought three copies. Digital deluxe and then two physicals. One for my friend as a gift and another to lend out to friends in general. That's how much I liked the game. I've never done something like that before.
Yea, I'm blessed for sure. Not rich but just have a set up that allows me to save a ton of money by sheer convenience in terms of where I live and how close my office is, etc. I can walk everywhere, got rid of my car during Covid and while the wife and I want kids, we don't have any yet. I always have tons of disposable income. One of the main reasons I actively take chances on games that many people write off and why I'm so vocal if I find them to be solid experiences. God bless you brother!Wish I had the funds to do the same. I live below the poverty line and save up fo buy games.
This game had some of the best, unique atmosphere in so long. Embracer has no clue what it's throwing away. Or they do and just don't care.
This was the kind of game I was willing to buy at full price. So few titles are worth $60 - $100. I can't think of any left on Embracer's current schedule I would pay out that kind of money for. Maybe they should just become a Gamepass/PS+ Extra house
It is a good game. Seriously. For those who are into this type of game, pretty old school horror, it's a good experience. I never understood the 4/10 review scores.Game was met with harsh criticism, I thought it looked okay?
I got the Collector's Edition.Well said.
I bought three copies. Digital deluxe and then two physicals. One for my friend as a gift and another to lend out to friends in general. That's how much I liked the game. I've never done something like that before.
Competents want serious jobs, it's obvious, neither of them thinks humbly.When a company is run by incompetent morons.
And two white protagonists, one of which is drinking through the whole game...This is the type of game too that would cause SBI and the woke mob to flee in terror like a vampire being presented with a crucifix. It is the polar opposite of woke. Plantation setting, references to slavery, mental illness, "tropes", etc. It is seriously a prime example of a game and studio that should have been supported via "voting with your wallet."
The fact that it wasn't controversial and didn't generate headlines at Kotaku speaks volumes to how few copies were sold.
Dubbed, or no subtitles?I was going to buy it but then I saw that the game wasn't dubbed in to my native language so... Bye, no regrets
You may have inadvertently answered why the media weren't interested in promoting/endorsing it. That, and some of them may still hold a petty grudge over THQ nordic.This is the type of game too that would cause SBI and the woke mob to flee in terror like a vampire being presented with a crucifix. It is the polar opposite of woke. Plantation setting, references to slavery, mental illness, "tropes", etc. It is seriously a prime example of a game and studio that should have been supported via "voting with your wallet."
The fact that it wasn't controversial and didn't generate headlines at Kotaku speaks volumes to how few copies were sold.
You may have inadvertently answered why the media weren't interesting in promoting/endorsing it. That, and some of them may still hold a petty grudge over THQ nordic.
It's a good game. Budget RE clone but solid and the glaring issues on launch have been ironed out. Even added new content and NG+The director of this game was the writer of SOMA, sad news. I heard the game was good.
Dubbed.Dubbed, or no subtitles?
Big difference.
True I mean survivor horror never sold good but this IP doesn't even have the cult status of Silent Hill.alot of budget was wasted on hiring hollywood actors , you should never hire expensive actors when you know your IP isnt a very popular one
Problem with game companies is that the second the studio/publisher thinks it's a AA or AAA kind of game, most will price it at $70 US. Ya, the same price as COD and GTA. Crazy. If anything, you;d think the higher the price, the more price variation while the dirt cheap stuff all gets sold at similar price tiers. But in gaming it's the opposite.Studios should learn from the success of things like helldivers (or a lot of pc games) and price their games accordingly. Put your games at 40 or 30 it's not a sin. I was interested in Ronin but not for 80 euros.. If it was 40 i would have checked it out. By the time it drops there it's probably going to either be on ps plus or i will have moved on since there are 1532 games released each month it seems.
I've been saying this for a while now that Embracer should be looking to Microsoft for some sort of partnership. Game Pass needs content, and Embracer needs money. Makes sense to me. Perhaps instead of closing down these studios they get contracted out to work on the insane IP hoard Microsoft has going on too. Or support studios/guns for hire for bigger projects ala Crystal Dynamics. Embracers current strategy is clearly not tenable, and a pivot, even just partially to something of this nature could work out in everyone's favor.Wish I had the funds to do the same. I live below the poverty line and save up fo buy games.
This game had some of the best, unique atmosphere in so long. Embracer has no clue what it's throwing away. Or they do and just don't care.
This was the kind of game I was willing to buy at full price. So few titles are worth $60 - $100. I can't think of any left on Embracer's current schedule I would pay out that kind of money for. Maybe they should just become a Gamepass/PS+ Extra house