Despera said:Ok... Got my hands on both Enslaved and Castlevania, but I'm currently playing this first.
Playing on Hard...
Acting is phenomenal. All I have to say is that the demo segment is utter crap compared to what comes next. The section that comes right after it should have been the demo.
Jtyettis said:Nice, 360 version? How is it holding up?
DaBuddaDa said:I think it's safe to say that this will perform exactly as well as Heavenly Sword did, maybe a little bit better. This won't start off as a huge seller because it doesn't have the marketing push behind it, but it may have some legs.
robotzombie said:So no system is the clear favorite? If I have both should I definitely get one over the other?
robotzombie said:So no system is the clear favorite? If I have both should I definitely get one over the other?
Graphics
Enslaved features great animation and a ton of beautiful color. Unfortunately, graphical glitches and framerate issues rear their heads often, particularly on the PS3.
V_Arnold said:360.
Clear favorite, but it is not bad on PS3 either. This was already figured out from the demo.
I AM JOHN! said:I'm actually shocked by the reviews.
B+ said:Enslaved takes the standard, post-apocalyptic videogame setting and mixes in a batch of steam punk and heavy science fiction for its stylized world. But as gorgeous as the levels look, it's the characters, dialog, and story that pull it all together...even when portions of the game become repetitious.
Same here. It's annoying because everyone seems to be ignoring that too. GAMES should be about GAMEplay first, not how pretty it is.sillymonkey321 said:Everytime i read a review snippet, this is what i read:
" Everything in this game is fantastic outside of the gameplay"
It's alan wake and bioshock all over again.
This is not a debate worth having.CaptYamato said:Same here. It's annoying because everyone seems to be ignoring that too. GAMES should be about GAMEplay first, not how pretty it is.
CaptYamato said:Same here. It's annoying because everyone seems to be ignoring that too. GAMES should be about GAMEplay first, not how pretty it is.
Bioshock had great gameplay.sillymonkey321 said:Everytime i read a review snippet, this is what i read:
" Everything in this game is fantastic outside of the gameplay"
It's alan wake and bioshock all over again.
But Alan Wake and Bioshock had decent to fun gameplay mechanics.sillymonkey321 said:Everytime i read a review snippet, this is what i read:
" Everything in this game is fantastic outside of the gameplay"
It's alan wake and bioshock all over again.
LQX said:Bioshock had great gameplay.
DevelopmentArrested said:was the gameplay in bioshock really that bad? /saving it for another time
I'm definitely picking this game up now. Control imprecision still really bothers me but I'll fight through it.
LQX said:Bioshock had great gameplay.
Nobody is saying Enslaved has bad mechanics, just not top of the line. I'd say "decent" is a great adjective.Haunted said:But Alan Wake and Bioshock had decent to fun gameplay mechanics.
Maybe you just like games holding your hand? I sure don't. Games should have some type of challenge.V_Arnold said:So you basically do not play adventure games, exploration/puzzle games, and MMO games (outside say WoW, or Aion, or I do not know what qualifies nowadays in the hardcore as "having gameplay" goes)?
I AM JOHN! said:This is not a debate worth having.
sillymonkey321 said:It's alan wake and bioshock all over again.
Exactly.DaBuddaDa said:Nobody is saying Enslaved has bad mechanics, just not top of the line. I'd say "decent" is a great adjective.
Where the hell are you guys getting these games? Just mom and pop shops or are larger retailers selling early?Despera said:Ok... Got my hands on both Enslaved and Castlevania, but I'm currently playing this first.
Playing on Hard...
Acting is phenomenal. All I have to say is that the demo segment is utter crap compared to what comes next. The section that comes right after it should have been the demo.
1up said it's 7 hours long, while IGN says it's 11 hours long and GameInformer says 8 to 9 hours.Dipswitch said:I'm glad this is getting good reviews. I thought the demo did a good job of showcasing the excellent production values. My main concern is still length - anyone beat it yet?
CaptYamato said:Maybe you just like games holding your hand? I sure don't. Games should have some type of challenge.
So far every review has said the same thing about the (lack of) depth in the gameplay. Also, take note of what I said in the demo thread."I will play the game but I don't see it getting deeper." Which seems to be the case.
DaBuddaDa said:1up said it's 7 hours long, while IGN says it's 11 hours long and GameInformer says 8 to 9 hours.
Its probably about 6 hours. Reviewers always overestimate this stuff.Dipswitch said:That seems to be about average - was afraid it'd be over in 5 hours or less. I think I'll stick this on my birthday/Christmas wishlist.