GeekyDad
Member
This should have been the thread title.they threw it over some glass, the painting is fine
it's whatever, a publicity stunt that's getting publicity
This should have been the thread title.they threw it over some glass, the painting is fine
it's whatever, a publicity stunt that's getting publicity
Cool story, but what does that have to do with the picture?Demonstrator Phoebe Plummer, 21, said: ‘What is worth more, art of life?
‘Is it worth more than food, worth more than justice?
‘Are you more concerned about the protection of a painting or the protection of our planet and people?
‘The cost of living crisis is part of the cost of oil crisis. Fuel is unaffordable to millions of cold hungry families.
‘They can’t even afford to heat a tin of soup,’ they added, waving one of the two soup cans.
Some serious Admiral Holdo energy radiating from the left side.
I guess I'm wrong.
For a minute there, I was thinking maybe for the first time ever, the protesters would be clean cut office workers, construction workers, or look like suburban parents taking their kids to soccer practice.
One of these times, it wont be woke looking, drugged up drop outs.
Yeah, their whole argument is kinda flawed. They're protesting oil because something something hunger or something like that? So the solution is to waste food on an oil painting. It's idiotic. It's as bad as those vegan protesters who waste perfectly good food in their protests. They're not helping their cause.That will show that painting to stop using so much Oil, the big greedy oil hungry painting.
I’m all for environmentalism, we need to be doing more as a species, but this is just being a vandal and a total jerk.
Tomato soup thrown over Vincent Van Gogh's famous Sunflowers painting
They also glued themselves to the wall.metro.co.uk
they were arguing that some people can't even afford to heat a can of soup due to the cost of living and rising energy costs. and they are asking people if they care more about an object/piece of art being damaged (the painting in fact was not damaged as it's behind glass) or the future of the planet or some shit like that. don't know what the super glue is all about lolYeah, their whole argument is kinda flawed. They're protesting oil because something something hunger or something like that? So the solution is to waste food on an oil painting. It's idiotic. It's as bad as those vegan protesters who waste perfectly good food in their protests. They're not helping their cause.
It's a thing some activists have taken to doing over the last few years in the UK.Can somebody explain to me this "glueing" stuff? Why do they glue themselves to objects like walls or furniture? What type of glue do they use? Why glue?
I would hope they would spend the rest of their miserable lives in jail.If the choice now is do you want these girls bailed out or the bail money to go to Australia, I'd choose the latter any day.
Not having kids is even better for the environmentRaising your kids better would be a start.
First let’s dramatically reduce livestock which is incredibly inefficient farming.Not having kids is even better for the environment
Is the pink-haired one a they/them person?They look exactly as expected.
First let’s dramatically reduce livestock which is incredibly inefficient farming.
They do it to themselves already in current year.Sterilize them
They are not right in any way. This is one of the worst takes I’ve seen on gafIt was dumb but they're also 100% right. More people give a shit about this stunt and worrying about the painting than the literal effects our society have on this planet. It's maddening.
There was 6.5 billion for Notre Dame in a day, but barely anyone gave a shit when Australia burned. We are too shortsighted and feckless to give a shit.
With all their propagating to the extremes, one would have to /quit life En mass.It was dumb but they're also 100% right. More people give a shit about this stunt and worrying about the painting than the literal effects our society have on this planet. It's maddening.
There was 6.5 billion for Notre Dame in a day, but barely anyone gave a shit when Australia burned. We are too shortsighted and feckless to give a shit.
Look at these idiots, they are putting other people in danger by blocking emergency vehicles.
Plot twist: it's that time of the month.Noobs, this is the only correct way put tomato sauce all over a masterpiece
What are you talking about? they gave to Notre Dame because they cared about it. It's completely normal to care about what's close to you. Everyone reacts in such ways, even you.It was dumb but they're also 100% right. More people give a shit about this stunt and worrying about the painting than the literal effects our society have on this planet. It's maddening.
There was 6.5 billion for Notre Dame in a day, but barely anyone gave a shit when Australia burned. We are too shortsighted and feckless to give a shit.
So what? The amount of people who took anything important from their "message" is countable on one hand. The only thing they did was make people wanna throw them into a river.I mean, they sprayed it over glass so they had no intent to cause damage, and got you to spread their message, so...
It's a publicity stunt, so you're playing into their hands by spreading this garbage is my point. It's essentially dumb kids throwing a can of soup on a piece of glass and being rewarded with immediate worldwide attentionSo what? The amount of people who took anything important from their "message" is countable on one hand. The only thing they did was make people wanna throw them into a river.
It would be more environmental if they jumped in a pool of acid. I vote for that.Next time, they should set themselves on fire. That really helps with saving the environment
I'm surprised to find myself agreeing with you.It's a publicity stunt, so you're playing into their hands by spreading this garbage is my point. It's essentially dumb kids throwing a can of soup on a piece of glass and being rewarded with immediate worldwide attention
Wether or not this actually hurts their cause in the long run is largely irrelevant..these kids don't actually give a fuck about oil consumption lmao
The point is people care more about art and buildings than the earth they live on. People get in an uproar over tomato soup thrown at a piece of art more than climate change. That's literally what she said and that is also what is happening.What are you talking about? they gave to Notre Dame because they cared about it. It's completely normal to care about what's close to you. Everyone reacts in such ways, even you.
Their point is not "right". It makes as much sense as pushing people in wheelchairs down the stairs to prove how the elderly lack support. If someone throws a sack of potatoes at your face and screams "people care more about this than the LITERAL effects on our society", what a fuck is that supposed to achieve? They don't even get the point they are trying to make.
Modern activists have failed us. Instead of becoming politicians and engineers and enacting real change they just follow their anger and abuse everyone who disagrees. Absolute fuck 'em all.
But it's not, climate change is one of the biggest topics of our time that is discussed at high levels in every government around the world.The point is people care more about art and buildings than the earth they live on. People get in an uproar over tomato soup thrown at a piece of art more than climate change. That's literally what she said and that is also what is happening.
It's discussed and almost nothing is done about it. Talk is cheap.But it's not, climate change is one of the biggest topics of our time that is discussed at high levels in every government around the world.
This stunt was a blip on the radar because they acted like assholes. Just because people like a legendary painting, doesn't mean they ignore climate change.
Nothing is done? they spend billions a year on this. Societies change from year to year to be more eco-friendly. It's hard to find an area with more action and reform.It's discussed and almost nothing is done about it. Talk is cheap.
Per Capita, USA is still one of the biggest CO2 emitting countries. Per person we produce double what a Chinese person produces.Nothing is done? they spend billions a year on this. Societies change from year to year to be more eco-friendly. It's hard to find an area with more action and reform.
The problem is they started too late, and there are a few massive straggling countries (china, india) that don't have the capability, possibility, or will to change.
Activists are not gonna do a thing here. Technology is our only hope. If you care about climate change, become an engineer. If we can find a way to create more energy, we can start using climate-altering drones. But so far we are far behind the curve on that. Maybe A.I. can help (before they destroy us).
Yeah, but China is the biggest, per capita doesn't mean much when a country is spewing out twice what anyone else is doing. I don't know the exact numbers, but asian in general is a huge issue, the states can change, they got the resources, but i am not sure how asia is gonna turn things around. Too much poverty and too few state initiatives.Per Capita, USA is still one of the biggest CO2 emitting countries. Per person we produce double what a Chinese person produces.
I agree it will probably be harder for them to change. I do know they're making more nuclear power plants than before so that will help curb it. I do feel enough isn't being done in the states, either. We have a subset of Americans that will roll coal just because they don't even believe anything is wrong.Yeah, but China is the biggest, per capita doesn't mean much when a country is spewing out twice what anyone else is doing. I don't know the exact numbers, but asian in general is a huge issue, the states can change, they got the resources, but i am not sure how asia is gonna turn things around. Too much poverty and too few state initiatives.