You don't belong in the HOF with a .260 average. You don't belong in the HOF if you're claim is a Sportscenter highlight. It's a career that makes it. My small list I posted is off the top of my head(besides Maz's stats), there's probably worse players than I could have put in there, feel free to google it.Look, if you want to bring up people in the Hall that also have black ethical marks on them then fine, but attacking players that got in because of defense or never being in the postseason (Especially for a player that spent almost his entire career during a period when the only postseason was the World Series and with the Reserve Clause still in effect) is ridiculous. It is not the Hall of Amazing Hitters and Pitchers That Had a Lot of Postseason Experience.
There are a fair number of HOF inductees with questionable personal and professional honor and ethics.
The ethical marks refer specifically to Pete's issue. He's a scumbag off the field, like many players and managers, but he does have the hits record and deserves to be in the HOF if scumbags like Bobby Cox do.
Honestly, the whole betting scandal is nothing to me ( my personal opinion ) but the fact that this man isn't in the HOF is blasphemous.
Is your "one" referring to the player/manager or the acts? Because both acts are banned from the sport and Bobby was never punished because his abused wife dropped the charges.Except that one is banned from Baseball, and the other is not.
Nevermind a guy like Jim Bunning, who never threw in the postseason is in there.
Is your "one" referring to the player/manager or the acts? Because both acts are banned from the sport and Bobby was never punished because his abused wife dropped the charges.
Why does postseason play matter at all? Not sure why you brought it up as some sort of qualifier.
Why does postseason play matter at all? Not sure why you brought it up as some sort of qualifier.
Because there all players with outstanding postseason careers still not in the hof(the whole point of sport is to win btw) while guys with no experience whatsoever made it in.Why does postseason play matter at all? Not sure why you brought it up as some sort of qualifier.
Ernie Banks never played in the post season either.
Totally.From my sentence structure and the quote that I was replying ti, it should be pretty clear that I was referring to one of those two people is banned from Baseball, and the other person isn't.
Hopefully that clears it up, though.
Being banned from Baseball makes you ineligible for the Hall of Fame.
Sadly, the thread that I created when he passed away got all of 7 posts (2 of them mine)
Because there all players with outstanding postseason careers still not in the hof(the whole point of sport is to win btw)
Totally.
I mean "one" is such a descriptive term. One should try and post quick jabs and smartass remarks in everything like one does.
Sadly, the thread that I created when he passed away got all of 7 posts (2 of them mine)
And I'm still willing to forgive the guy and let him in the HoF.
2500 H, 500+ HR, 2 MVP, Gold Glove, 10 All-Star games.
Definitely deserves it.
Because there all players with outstanding postseason careers still not in the hof(the whole point of sport is to win btw) while guys with no experience whatsoever made it in.
http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/287142-the-best-pitchers-not-in-the-hof-who-got-overlooked
Does a real good indepth look at pitchers who should be in over some of the guys already in there
Because there all players with outstanding postseason careers still not in the hof(the whole point of sport is to win btw) while guys with no experience whatsoever made it in.
http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/287142-the-best-pitchers-not-in-the-hof-who-got-overlooked
Does a real good indepth look at pitchers who should be in over some of the guys already in there
Don't you dare mock Bobby V the man is a saint!
You don't belong in the HOF with a .260 average. You don't belong in the HOF if you're claim is a Sportscenter highlight. It's a career that makes it. My small list I posted is off the top of my head(besides Maz's stats), there's probably worse players than I could have put in there, feel free to google it.
Maz is like a Dave Roberts to me. He started the rally for the Red Sox comeback, was a decent player, but in no way deserves to be in the Hall. Maz got in because of his hr in LA that is shown ever post season. His career isn't a HOF career.
Its the same argument against Edgar Martinez and Ortiz, both barely played defense, and likely won't get into the HOF(Ortiz will before Edgar because of rings). Why do defensive players who cant hit for shit deserve to be in if DHs don't?
The ethical marks refer specifically to Pete's issue. He's a scumbag off the field, like many players and managers, but he does have the hits record and deserves to be in the HOF if scumbags like Bobby Cox do.
Sometimes I forget that he managed the 2012 Red Sox.
Repressed memories, I guess >.>
I'm not sure "managed" is quite the right word for it.
Agreed. Unless he bet AGAINST his team it doesn't matter one bit. Not advantage was gained. And if he did bet on his teams to win. Oh well...so he thought his team was going to win the game? Every player should.And I'm still willing to forgive the guy and let him in the HoF.
Agreed. Unless he bet AGAINST his team it doesn't matter one bit. Not advantage was gained. And if he did bet on his teams to win. Oh well...so he thought his team was going to win the game? Every player should.
Both of these points have been brought up, discussed, and addressed earlier in this thread - multiple times.
People should be allowed to bet on themselves. It's only extra motivation to play hard. What the hell is wrong with that?
And yes, it's proven he never bet against himself or his team.
It can imply that you know of a fix and are betting on that knowledge.If you bet against yourself, sure.
But if you bet on yourself, what's the harm?
It can imply that you know of a fix and are betting on that knowledge.
What are you talking about?Oh boy, conspiracy theories now. Did he short airline stocks before 9/11, too?
Considering all the other issues in baseball over the years, I'm surprised this is the one they've not let go of.
There could be a whole section just on the wrongdoings of baseball in the HoF.
The main issue is steroids were never against the rules at that point, but betting on baseball had a rule of a lifetime ban. I understand why people disagree but "rules are rules".