Explain this then. Why do some of the most popular Japanese made games in America feature a main character that looks more white than anything?
Final fantasy:
Cloud looks white. As does squall. Lightning looks white. Tidus. I can go on and on.
Metal Gear
Snake looks white. Raiden. Could go on and on...
Resident evil.
Jill, chris, Leon, Clair.. Once again can go on and on.
So what gives? We had threads on how the Japanese like to make games catered to them yet their main characters often look white with blue eyes and blonde hair, in which is not natural to Japanese.
The thing is, those games were also made w/ a Western audience in mind, particularly white Westerners, and Japan is a very homogenous country. Also at the time of those games they likely had less info on the diversity in Western society than they do now (altho that isn't me implying such). And for characters like Jill, Chris, and such...well, they're technically supposed to be Caucasian so it makes sense for them to look Caucasian rather than Japanese.
In my mind, the whole argument of Japanese designers making games that cater to them has always seemed more in terms of themes, mechanics and nature of play to me, rather than something based around ethnic representation. There's also other societal/cultural aspects there which could explain why very few Japanese games seem to have Japanese characters that actually
look Japanese, but I'm not the person who could be qualified to get into that. It would be an interesting and probably revealing topic, however.
I think everyone is misunderstanding this statement. The line of thinking here is that we're all human, and race should be a "non-issue" - black/white/asian/hispanic/etc. should all be treated the same way. It's a statement that we should transcend racism, not ignore it. Delsin from inFamous: SS is a good example. He's Native American, and it's touched upon, but he's mostly just "Delsin" and not stereotyped or categorized into ethnic tropes.
I know most people see statements like this and think "wishful thinking" or "how nice it is to ignore the world's problems", but this is really the line of thinking we need to get to if racism if ever going to go away. Of course, we can't just zip to the finish line and ignore all the baby steps we have to take to get there, but the attack on z-layrex here is a misunderstanding, I think.
Trust me, I know what they're trying to say. There are some shifty people out there who use the issue of race for some sort of gain removed from the issue itself, be it social, financial, or political. That is a real issue and should be addressed, because those sort of people have a lot of clout and their intentions are more to milk the issue for what it's worth, knowing that if it ever is solved, that's a lost of revenue/public image enhancement. I don't take kindly to those sort of people....
....but that isn't actually the case here, because most of us know there's a real problem with representation of different ethnic groups in video games. So that poster's comment comes across as slanderous and an attempt to "sweep it under the rug, throw it in the closet and toss away the key" sort of deal, or at the very least belittles the people who see it as a problem and want to fix it....
...which incidentally, was
exactly what I had done a bit earlier in the thread (also not intentional/misinterpreted), and had to correct. If the poster means their opinion to be interpreted correctly, they should state it more clearly, that's all.